Ron Paul: Bailouts will lead to rough economic ride

Watermark said:
You know who knows a lot about economics?

Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke. They actually have degree's in it. They support this plan.

Compare to Epicurus, who's qualification is that he read "Wealth of Nations", Dano, who reads Limbaugh and other right wing hack books, and RS, who read some shit from the pseudo-scientific Austrian school and considers himself a genius. Our three home study economists!
Click to expand...

Limbaugh bought the Economist apparently.
Water remember it's better to go hungry, then start your day with a bowl of these.
[ame="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/14892/"]Emo Cereal Video[/ame]
 
Watermark said:
I think your idiotic comparison has nothing to do with reality.

The economic situation in Japan could have been prevented. But the banks in Japan decided that free market idiocy was best, and they've been rewarded by no longer being a major world economic power.
Click to expand...

well yeah for a nitpicker. But this is a disaster and how we handle it determins our future.
 
Watermark said:
You know who knows a lot about economics?

Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke. They actually have degree's in it. They support this plan.

Compare to Epicurus, who's qualification is that he read "Wealth of Nations", Dano, who reads Limbaugh and other right wing hack books, and RS, who read some shit from the pseudo-scientific Austrian school and considers himself a genius. Our three home study economists!
Click to expand...

If you are going to impersonate toppy you need to be less coherent.

I have read a wide variety of "pseudo-scientific shit," including Greenspan. But that was before he got into the business of blowing bubbles.
 
Watermark said:
You know who knows a lot about economics?

Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke. They actually have degree's in it. They support this plan.

Compare to Epicurus, who's qualification is that he read "Wealth of Nations", Dano, who reads Limbaugh and other right wing hack books, and RS, who read some shit from the pseudo-scientific Austrian school and considers himself a genius. Our three home study economists!
Click to expand...

yeah they are well programmed in the system that caused all of this.
drink of the hair of the dog that bit you is not any soloution.
 
He says a lot of dumb shit, particularly about economic issues, without bothering to check and see if it's true or not.

Dissecting his stupidity line by line would be a full-time 60 hr/week job, and I don't have time for it.
 
RStringfield said:
If you are going to impersonate toppy you need to be less coherent.

I have read a wide variety of "pseudo-scientific shit," including Greenspan. But that was before he got into the business of blowing bubbles.
Click to expand...

Greenspan has recognized the failure of his neo-Randite policies since it caused the 2000 recession.
 
Epicurus said:
He says a lot of dumb shit, particularly about economic issues, without bothering to check and see if it's true or not.

Dissecting his stupidity line by line would be a full-time 60 hr/week job, and I don't have time for it.
Click to expand...
Yeah I hear you, the scary thing about him is that he makes himself sound so confident when he spews BS that the average Joe listening would really think he knows his shit.
 
KingCondanomation said:
Yeah I hear you, the scary thing about him is that he makes himself sound so confident when he spews BS that the average Joe listening would really think he knows his shit.
Click to expand...

I guess... I find that watermark is very vague when he is pretending to be a socialist. Well, this time. When he first joined up pretending to be a socialist he just played like a retard.
 
RStringfield said:
I guess... I find that watermark is very vague when he is pretending to be a socialist. Well, this time. When he first joined up pretending to be a socialist he just played like a retard.
Click to expand...

I am a socialist.

And it's not good to let the markets fail. Life doesn't always work like that.
 
The markets will not fail. Some businesses will. If we'd quit propping these businesses up then the failures would be far less spectacular. They'd go mostly unnoticed.

Are you now in favor of trade barriers as well?
 
RStringfield said:
The markets will not fail. Some businesses will. If we'd quit propping these businesses up then the failures would be far less spectacular. They'd go mostly unnoticed.

Are you now in favor of trade barriers as well?
Click to expand...

The magic hand will take care of it.

I think that we need to penalize nations that have low standards for workers with equalizing tariffs. :D
 
RStringfield said:
I guess... I find that watermark is very vague when he is pretending to be a socialist. Well, this time. When he first joined up pretending to be a socialist he just played like a retard.
Click to expand...
Yeah I remember, now I'd say matters are worse, when he tried to be a Libertarian, you could tell he didn't really understand a lot but it's always difficult to criticize and correct those who are on your side. Now he thinks he knows what he is rejecting in Capitalism and Libertarianism when in reality he never understood them.

I think he's too intellectually lazy to bother to read more than he needs to up to the point where he feels he gets the gist of things.
 
There IS NO market when values are propped up by fiat currency so SELECT COMPANIES can remain solvent. That's not a market, it's a totalitarian distortion of reality.
 
KingCondanomation said:
Yeah I remember, now I'd say matters are worse, when he tried to be a Libertarian, you could tell he didn't really understand a lot but it's always difficult to criticize and correct those who are on your side. Now he thinks he knows what he is rejecting in Capitalism and Libertarianism when in reality he never understood them.

I think he's too intellectually lazy to bother to read more than he needs to up to the point where he feels he gets the gist of things.
Click to expand...

My guess, is that he is trolling.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top