Russia's Gazprom Predicts $250 Oil by 2009
- Thread starter Topspin
- Start date
I guess you can't read, typical USCit.
You have to the most dedicated to alarmism of any other poster on this board. There are many ways you can get it to work for you, not the least of which is getting your oldness off the grid.
The "we'll all pay the same anyway!" is BS. I'm just one example of that.
uscitizen
Villified User
How decietful of you to change my post damo. Here is what I actually said.
"Yes Damo, but we will still be paying costs whether for oil or alternatives."
as I said typical republican of you.
I changed no post at all.
This is a total fabrication. A lie, direct deceit. Didn't happen and will not happen. I have never done anything of the sort. Nor will I. And if I must for moderation I will tell you it happened.
I have changed no post here to read any differently, ever, except those I have deleted links to porn or advertisements.
I asked you to show how we would be paying "those costs", you have shown nothing of the sort while being shown that "those costs" would indeed not be paid and proved an incapacity for reading comprehension beyond measure and directly lied about changing posts.
uscitizen
Villified User
Then you misquoted me. Divert away damo.
Crawfish much?
I will never allow somebody to suggest I change their posts and let it go without an answer, I do not do that.
I directly quoted the post using the quote feature.
Look.
either you made a non-sense post about paying "cost" or you suggested the cost is the same. When I asked you to elaborate you said we'd pay it through solar, etc. I showed how the savings was there and how it would pay for itself and now you are trying to suggest I misquoted you.
Your crawfishing is evident. And desperate.
uscitizen
Villified User
au contrare oh obtuse one. you inserted a quote of what I said in quote marks in your reply.
sheesh I don't know why i even argue with someone mre stubborn than myself.
I am correct damo but will conceed to your diversionary emminence.
Look.
either you made a nonsense post about paying "cost" or you suggested the cost is the same. When I asked you to elaborate you said we'd pay it through solar, etc. I showed how the savings was there and how it would pay for itself and now you are trying to suggest I misquoted you.
Your crawfishing is evident. And desperate.
uscitizen
Villified User
I bow to your obliqueness oh great one.
I will leave it to othere to follow the thread and see who is in error. I admitted to my poor choice of words regarding your changing a post.
We does include more than just yourself damo. One size does not filt all.
I stated that buying a hybrid to save gas does not benefit me at all.
although I own one thru one of my businesses, but it is a training toool.
I will leave it to othere to follow the thread and see who is in error. I admitted to my poor choice of words regarding your changing a post.
We does include more than just yourself damo. One size does not filt all.
I stated that buying a hybrid to save gas does not benefit me at all.
although I own one thru one of my businesses, but it is a training toool.
Last edited:
Hence the FACT that I put on the bottom of my post a suggestion that each person look into their own situation and calculate their own savings. Again, you promote your total lack of reading comprehension in a desperate ploy to pretend I am somehow selfish, and only talk about my circumstances.
At least you did say it was wrong to suggest I changed your posts. I'm glad you did that.
