Small Business Forced to Close by Gov't. Subsidies to Wal-Mart

Cypress

Well-known member
Capitalism and Free markets!



Small Business Forced to Close by Gov't. Subsidies to Wal-Mart

By Sherwood Ross

Small retailers the nation over are being pushed out of business by government subsidies to chain competitors such as Wal-Mart and Target through a variety of “corporate socialism” schemes, taxation authority David Cay Johnston says.

Municipalities are permitting “tax increment financing” that allow the big chains “to keep the sales taxes that you are forced to pay at the tax register,” Johnston said on the television interview program “Books of Our Time,” sponsored by the Massachusetts School of Law at Andover and broadcast by Comcast.

“Instead of that money going to the schools and the fire department and the police department and the library, it is funneled through a mechanism of local government, usually a special authority, to finance the purchase of municipal bonds so that means that the wealthy underwriters and the lawyers and auditors all get a piece of this money to buy the land and build the store,” Johnson told TV host Lawrence Velvel, dean of the law school.

The store is then leased to the big chain developer “at terms that amount to giving it to them for free or nearly free over a period of time,” Johnston said, “and it’s destroying local business.” An amazing aspect of this “corporate socialism” policy, Johnston says, “is that local business owners have not risen up and stopped this.”

“A system in which government, whether Federal or local, picks the winners in the economy, is not capitalism, it’s not competition, it’s not free market, it is corporate socialism, it is statism, it’s the state making these choices,” Johnston said.

In his new book, “Free Lunch”(Portfolio) Johnston amplifies this point by noting “Sam Walton practiced corporate socialism. As much as he could, he put the public’s money to work for his benefit. Free land, long-term leases at below-market rates, pocketing sales taxes, even getting workers trained at government expense were among the ways Wal-Mart took every dollar of welfare it could get.”

“Walton had a particular fondness for government-sponsored industrial revenue bonds,” Johnston continued, “which cost him less in interest charges than the corporate bonds the market economy uses to raise money.”

Johnston said in the television interview that if the public really understood what was happening they would not permit government subsidies to corporations to go forward.


http://www.politicalaffairs.net/article/articleview/6649/1/324/
 
corporate socialism is called fascism.

More millionaires than ever before! (but less people able to take care of their families too)
 
Paying companies to locate in a state or area has become a common practice.
Ans in what has become the American way, the larger the company, the more govt help and attention it gets.
Just look at Bear Stearns.
 
Dang Cypress, your website defines itself as "Marxist Thought Online". You are hitting on a serious left turn.
 
Dang Cypress, your website defines itself as "Marxist Thought Online". You are hitting on a serious left turn.

Listen fascist, get a grip on yourself. Do you approve of the state and big business conspiring to squeeze out smaller businesses?
 
So write a law to make the practice illegal. So far it's just smart business. Make it illegal.

Yep.
The politicos try and justify it now by saying it brings jobs in. If it is a manufacturer that can be true, but if a retailer it pretty much just shuffles jobs around.
 
Capitalism and Free markets!



Small Business Forced to Close by Gov't. Subsidies to Wal-Mart

By Sherwood Ross

Small retailers the nation over are being pushed out of business by government subsidies to chain competitors such as Wal-Mart and Target through a variety of “corporate socialism” schemes, taxation authority David Cay Johnston says.

Municipalities are permitting “tax increment financing” that allow the big chains “to keep the sales taxes that you are forced to pay at the tax register,” Johnston said on the television interview program “Books of Our Time,” sponsored by the Massachusetts School of Law at Andover and broadcast by Comcast.

“Instead of that money going to the schools and the fire department and the police department and the library, it is funneled through a mechanism of local government, usually a special authority, to finance the purchase of municipal bonds so that means that the wealthy underwriters and the lawyers and auditors all get a piece of this money to buy the land and build the store,” Johnson told TV host Lawrence Velvel, dean of the law school.

The store is then leased to the big chain developer “at terms that amount to giving it to them for free or nearly free over a period of time,” Johnston said, “and it’s destroying local business.” An amazing aspect of this “corporate socialism” policy, Johnston says, “is that local business owners have not risen up and stopped this.”

“A system in which government, whether Federal or local, picks the winners in the economy, is not capitalism, it’s not competition, it’s not free market, it is corporate socialism, it is statism, it’s the state making these choices,” Johnston said.

In his new book, “Free Lunch”(Portfolio) Johnston amplifies this point by noting “Sam Walton practiced corporate socialism. As much as he could, he put the public’s money to work for his benefit. Free land, long-term leases at below-market rates, pocketing sales taxes, even getting workers trained at government expense were among the ways Wal-Mart took every dollar of welfare it could get.”

“Walton had a particular fondness for government-sponsored industrial revenue bonds,” Johnston continued, “which cost him less in interest charges than the corporate bonds the market economy uses to raise money.”

Johnston said in the television interview that if the public really understood what was happening they would not permit government subsidies to corporations to go forward.


http://www.politicalaffairs.net/article/articleview/6649/1/324/

It's the race of our states to the bottom. To gain an advantage they are taxing their people and sending the money off to coporations. They're literally enslaving their people in that manner.
 
It is hypocrisy, but this hypocrisy does not go unnoticed by those who truly believe in free markets.

You might ask if there is a certain political party on the local level that is more apt to approve of this kind of economic planning.
 
It's the race of our states to the bottom. To gain an advantage they are taxing their people and sending the money off to coporations. They're literally enslaving their people in that manner.

It is the inevitable result of capitalism not properly regulated.
what do you expect when you have dorks running the country with the attitude of "If it is good for the market it is good for America"
 
It is the inevitable result of seperate national/governmental units being given almost complete power over the people and sharing the same market.
 
It is the inevitable result of capitalism not properly regulated.
what do you expect when you have dorks running the country with the attitude of "If it is good for the market it is good for America"

Nonsense. It is the result of "capitalism" regulated.

“A system in which government, whether Federal or local, picks the winners in the economy, is not capitalism, it’s not competition, it’s not free market, it is corporate socialism, it is statism, it’s the state making these choices,” Johnston said.
 
Not nonsense. Unregulated or underregulatred capitalism will always result in the little guy being abused.

This is the result of regulated markets/capitalism.

The author even says this. Again...

“A system in which government, whether Federal or local, picks the winners in the economy, is not capitalism, it’s not competition, it’s not free market, it is corporate socialism, it is statism, it’s the state making these choices,” Johnston said.
 
There must be regulation AGAINST collusion and statist favoritism. Yes, it's regulation, but all regulation is not equal. DOn't be a dimtard, stringfield.
 
The type needed here is none. The problem is clearly government interference in the free market. Not the free market. This is exactly the sort of government corruption that a free is market is meant to be free of.
 
Back
Top