This is how well 'abstinence' works. 
States with abstinence-only education have higher teen pregnancy rates

States with abstinence-only education have higher teen pregnancy rates
Not at all. That is like saying having laws against murder requires rescinding the rights of the murderer. Stop being obtuse.
Bottom line is this, women like you want to have a consequence free life. That is why you support abortion. You want the ability to be a whore without consequence. Well, there are consequences. You look at abortion as your little insurance policy for your irresponsible behavior. But you hide behind travesties like rape to support your belief.
It is shameful and if you had any sense of decency you would be embarrassed. But, that is a big IF.
I wonder why feminists strongly believe that the anti-choice movement is completely and 100% about controlling women's sexuality and punishing them anytime they fuck without permission?
It's such a mystery...
Almost as big of a mystery of why this piece of shit who posted my picture numerous times and threatened to post my under-aged niece's is still posting here while we all pretend that we don't know it.
This is how well 'abstinence' works.
States with abstinence-only education have higher teen pregnancy rates
Of course not. Abstinence doesn't work because it isn't practiced, doofus.
the anti-choice movement is completely and 100% about controlling women's sexuality and punishing them anytime they fuck without permission
I understand the difference perfectly. A health problem may cause debilitating and permanent effects but not immediate death.
I suppose your comment about a woman having an abortion to end morning sickness was a talking point fed to you by some religious group, unless you can prove with real evidence that it actually happened.
Providing rights to the unborn requires rescinding its mother's.
This is how well 'abstinence' works.
States with abstinence-only education have higher teen pregnancy rates
so you wouldn't encourage a woman to have an abortion just to avoid the natural consequences of pregnancy?......
I see the problem......you can't tell the difference between practicing abstinence and recommending abstinence.....birth control pills or condoms that aren't used are equally ineffective.....
Ground truth bears repeating:
if you knew some truth that bore repeating, why did you choose to repeat bullshit in its place?....
It's no one's business to "encourage" or discourage a woman from making the choice one way or another, a concept you're obviously incapable of grasping.
the dead children might look at it differently.....
Gee, why's that? Could it be because abstinence wasn't practiced?
Awww. Too bad.
give the woman a ceegar, she finally figured it out.......yes, not practicing birth control of any means, pills, condoms or abstinence, accomplishes nothing.....but, if you are inclined to practice any form of birth control, abstinence is your best shot at avoiding an unwanted pregnancy.......but meanwhile.....killing your children is not birth control.....it's killing your children......
Suck it.
so it boils down to this.....you aren't concerned about the health of the mother, you're only concerned about opportunity to kill children.....