WTF are you talking about?
lets guess Darla is way below median on expected wealth,
Dave has already admitted as much
thanks for proving yet again you are amoungst the biggest whinners.
citing an example doesn't detract from millions that hold true to the test.
No dipshit, I make a really good salary for my age. Saying I should be worth $160,000 or whatever since I make a good salary is purely retarded. I'm only 26 and haven't had time to accumulate assets like some of the older fucks making what I do have had. I just bought my first house but I didn't do it with all cash.. I'm sorry I must be a total economic retard because I'm paying for something over time since I don't have $160000 to pull out of my ass just yet. I've only had a 401K for 2 years, and my Stock Portfolio is made up of play cash. It has nothing to do with my economic IQ.
It has everything to do with the real world.
How did you apply what you learned in college, those of you especially if you had any business classes.
If you are behind the median you either aren't trying or your below average in economic skills.
When there are 1000s of exceptions, yes, it does prove there is no correlation. According to you just about every heir, athlete and/or celebrity without a huge substance abuse problem is an economic genius.
According to your ignorance of the subject, we should put the Olsen Twins in charge of the economy. They are super rich and only 22.
How much money you have gives no indication of your economic knowledge. It is clear, to all, that you continue to confuse economic knowledge with financial knowledge or being smart with your money. But net worth does not even prove you necessarily know much about those subjects.
By definition Top, half the people have to be below the median.
ib1 your stupid enough to be a bullet catcher, nuff said
watergerber, I made more than you at 15, you'll be 30 when and if you get out of law school and you'll be way below average as an income generating lawyer cause your a dork.