The Conservative Nanny State

Ohh Stupid people vote for democrats too. I am just talking about who the smart people vote for. Who do most professors and teachers vote for ?

I am just so sure your beloved USC is a hotbed of republicanism ;)

Damn straight 'SC (student body) leans right. One of the few major college campuses that does.
 
Curious how the book is about how the rich use the system to rob and steal, but some only see the poor. It is a comment on belief systems that whimpering republicans defend the rich and condemn the poor so often. Jesus should come back and see this I'm sure he'd have a good laugh.
 
No comments from Dixie or his proteges? Do you ever notice he starts bizarre threads that make an attempt to set you up and before long it ceases to be an debate about something but rather becomes a debate about the debate.

from Barack's talk in Philadelphia

"In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world’s great religions demand – that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother’s keeper, Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister’s keeper. Let us find that common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect that spirit as well.

For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle – as we did in the OJ trial – or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news. We can play Reverend Wright’s sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she’s playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies.

We can do that.

But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we’ll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change.

That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, “Not this time.” This time we want to talk about the crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and white children and Asian children and Hispanic children and Native American children. This time we want to reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids can’t learn; that those kids who don’t look like us are somebody else’s problem. The children of America are not those kids, they are our kids, and we will not let them fall behind in a 21st century economy. Not this time."
 
I still want to know why the republicans and conservatives defend and apologize for the rich? Do they know any? Do the rich suffer so? It is like a reverse Sermon on the Mount, now the moral is who cares!
 
As you've bumped the thread, I must reiterate that I believe my original answer is valid and accurate to the situation in the Republican Party today.

Not all Republicans are committed to being politically and economically Conservative. It is generally admitted by most Republicans that the current brand of elected leadership for at least the last five years has been unsatisfactory on basic economic issues.


If the elected leadership were committed to Conservative principles, they would assure that institutions were not designed to distort markets in favor of special interests. That is supposed to be a core principle.

We shall see what the Democrats have to offer this next go-round, but I do believe we will find many instances where they are guilty of many of the same inequities.

The left simply has different marketing for many of the same policies. Please don't forget their adventures in the mold of the League of Municipalities with Kelo v. New London.
 
If the elected leadership were committed to Conservative principles, they would assure that institutions were not designed to distort markets in favor of special interests. That is supposed to be a core principle.

.

But since it isn't the whole "free markets" movement needs to be rethought. All markets are a contrivance, they get set up after the boys with the guns decide who gets to do it.
 
Back
Top