The President Can Now Assassinate You, Officially

NakedHunterBiden

“It’s the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown”

Under this new standard, a president can go on a four-to-eight year crime spree and then retire from public life, never to be held accountable.

Welp, Donald Trump won. The Supreme Court today ruled that presidents are entitled to “absolute immunity” from criminal prosecution for official acts, then contended that pressuring the vice president and the Department of Justice to overthrow the government was an “official act,” then said that talking to advisers or making public statements are “official acts” as well, and then determined evidence of what presidents say and do cannot be used against them to establish that their acts are “unofficial.”


The ruling from the Supreme Court was 6-3, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, on a straight party-line vote, with all the Republican-appointed justices joining to give the president the power of a king. While some parts of the federal indictment against Trump will be remanded back down to the district-court trial judge to determine whether any of Trump’s actions were “unofficial” (“unofficial” acts, the court says are not entitled to immunity), Trump’s victory in front of the Supreme Court is total. Essentially all he has to do is claim that everything he did to plot a coup was part of his “official” duties, and the Supreme Court provided no clear method or evidentiary standard that can be used to challenge that presumption.

Legally, there are two critical things to understand about the totality of the court’s ruling here:

  • The immunity is absolute
  • There is no legislative way to get rid of what the court has given
 

Under this new standard, a president can go on a four-to-eight year crime spree and then retire from public life, never to be held accountable.

Welp, Donald Trump won. The Supreme Court today ruled that presidents are entitled to “absolute immunity” from criminal prosecution for official acts, then contended that pressuring the vice president and the Department of Justice to overthrow the government was an “official act,” then said that talking to advisers or making public statements are “official acts” as well, and then determined evidence of what presidents say and do cannot be used against them to establish that their acts are “unofficial.”


The ruling from the Supreme Court was 6-3, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, on a straight party-line vote, with all the Republican-appointed justices joining to give the president the power of a king. While some parts of the federal indictment against Trump will be remanded back down to the district-court trial judge to determine whether any of Trump’s actions were “unofficial” (“unofficial” acts, the court says are not entitled to immunity), Trump’s victory in front of the Supreme Court is total. Essentially all he has to do is claim that everything he did to plot a coup was part of his “official” duties, and the Supreme Court provided no clear method or evidentiary standard that can be used to challenge that presumption.

Legally, there are two critical things to understand about the totality of the court’s ruling here:

  • The immunity is absolute
  • There is no legislative way to get rid of what the court has given
there is still impeachment to hold a president accountable.

that;s the constitutional solution.
 
none of that matters anymore. Biden is now immune. Enjoy
biden has been immune for his entire time in the white house. He's had the CIA, the IRS, the FBI, his DOJ, the AG, the faux/propaganda media, and his dem DAs/Prosecutors cover for his sad ass. He's about ready to go to sleep for eternity.
Your dem authoritarian/Marxist/Communist administration will soon be replaced by Trump's MAKE AMERICA FIRST Constitutional Republic.
 

Under this new standard, a president can go on a four-to-eight year crime spree and then retire from public life, never to be held accountable.

Welp, Donald Trump won. The Supreme Court today ruled that presidents are entitled to “absolute immunity” from criminal prosecution for official acts, then contended that pressuring the vice president and the Department of Justice to overthrow the government was an “official act,” then said that talking to advisers or making public statements are “official acts” as well, and then determined evidence of what presidents say and do cannot be used against them to establish that their acts are “unofficial.”


The ruling from the Supreme Court was 6-3, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, on a straight party-line vote, with all the Republican-appointed justices joining to give the president the power of a king. While some parts of the federal indictment against Trump will be remanded back down to the district-court trial judge to determine whether any of Trump’s actions were “unofficial” (“unofficial” acts, the court says are not entitled to immunity), Trump’s victory in front of the Supreme Court is total. Essentially all he has to do is claim that everything he did to plot a coup was part of his “official” duties, and the Supreme Court provided no clear method or evidentiary standard that can be used to challenge that presumption.

Legally, there are two critical things to understand about the totality of the court’s ruling here:

  • The immunity is absolute
  • There is no legislative way to get rid of what the court has given
Then you better shut your pie hole skank
 
This is the crux of it:

Some "will argue that presidents can still be prosecuted for 'unofficial acts,' and so they will say that everything is fine.
But they will be wrong, because while the Supreme Court says 'unofficial' acts are still prosecutable, the court has left nearly no sphere in which the president can be said to be acting 'unofficially.' And more importantly, the court has left virtually no vector of evidence that can be deployed against a president to prove that their acts were 'unofficial.' If trying to overthrow the government is 'official,' then what isn’t?"


If there's answer to that I would like to see it. And if there is one bright spot in all this it is seeing all this cheering on the Right - the self proclaimed stalwarts of limited government, for a decision that so completely delimits the authority of the head of the government.
 
After seeing prominent Democrat voices openly calling for Trump's assassination today and to impeach the Supreme Court, I am unfortunately now confident that Trump's #47 2nd term is going to be filled with historic levels of Leftist violence and disorder.

These Marxists do NOT want to relinquish control of their authoritarian federal government and they will engage in terrorism to stop it.

Brace Yourselves, for these Marxists will stop at nothing to keep control and power.
 
After seeing prominent Democrat voices openly calling for Trump's assassination today and to impeach the Supreme Court, I am unfortunately now confident that Trump's #47 2nd term is going to be filled with historic levels of Leftist violence and disorder.

These Marxists do NOT want to relinquish control of their authoritarian federal government and they will engage in terrorism to stop it.

Brace Yourselves, for these Marxists will stop at nothing to keep control and power.
more projection
 
Besides Trump and Nixon I don't know of any who committed crimes.
https://www.aclu.org/video/aclu-ccr-lawsuit-american-boy-killed-us-drone-strike

Obama Administration Claims Unchecked Authority To Kill ...​


American Civil Liberties Union
https://www.aclu.org › press-releases › obama-administr...


The lawsuit asks the court to rule that, outside the context of armed conflict, the government can carry out the targeted killing of an American citizen only as ...
 
Back
Top