The Problem with the 2nd Amendment

[SmarterthanYou]

I hope you try slave lover

i'm sure you do, slave

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Why do you ask? Over and over and over and over and...

Because until YOU answered here, nobody else would.

 

[/MSG/]

Because until YOU answered here, nobody else would.

Oh someone answered finally? Damn.....this is a conundrum for me.

 

[/MSG/]

OMG Almighty! The purpose of freedom of speech in our first amendment is so that people can criticize our government without fear of government reprisals, ie; being charged with/imprisoned for sedition.

I'm sorry, but that cannot be true. How can one right be used against the government but not others? It's logically inconsistent.

 

[Cancel 2016.11]

Because until YOU answered here, nobody else would.

Isn't the answer self-evident to anyone who's read the first amendment? It's not exactly some obscure meaning.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Isn't the answer self-evident to anyone who's read the first amendment? It's not exactly some obscure meaning.

the same could be said about the 2nd, the 4th, and the 5th. but i'm sure that we'll soon see the very reason why.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

for the same reason you can not own a rocket launcher a person doesnt need to own certain hand held weapons.


Only an idiot would refuse to see that

For the same reason you can't drive an Indy car in city traffic, a person doesn't need to own a car that can go 55 mph.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

did you think that would scare me you taintlicker?

You seem to be jelous; because no one will give a proper "tongue lashing".

 

[USFREEDOM911]

hey racidslong,


How can anyone be reasured when you say you wont shoot anyone.

Your a lying POS who cant be honest for one damned second.


When they come for your guns you will hand them over with a smile and we all know it.

Its either that or prison or worse.


Threating fellow Americans becuase you do not want to follow a completely constitutional law is abpout as unAmerican as you can get.



You just dont like democracy

You go right on and keep believing that; because everyone knows that it helps your delusions.
Just curious though.
How are they going to know where to go, to do this imagined confiscation?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

the founder CHOSE democracy.


We are a Democracy.

stop lying about it

We are a Democratic REPUBLIC, you stupid twat.
Learn the difference and be very afraid.
VERY AFRAID

 

[canceled.2021.1]

We are a Democratic REPUBLIC, you stupid twat.
Learn the difference and be very afraid.
VERY AFRAID

That is why she ran from the thread.

 

[Topspin]

No one is afraid of he mini bike patch wearer!
Usfreedumb

 

[Minister of Truth]

The purpose of the 1A is to ensure the survival of Wreality TV shows such as the late Jersey Shore.

 

[/MSG/]

The purpose of the 1A is to ensure the survival of Wreality TV shows such as the late Jersey Shore.

But the Founders never would have envisioned television, therefore it cannot be protected.

 

[Topspin]

The second amendment was and is a racist tool to control dark people!
Couldn't have the slaves revolt against understanding wanting to talk it out massa!

 

[I'm Watermark]

We are a Democratic REPUBLIC, you stupid twat.
Learn the difference and be very afraid.
VERY AFRAID

We are not democratic. I believe the correct term would be polyarchy, or some variation of plutocracy.

 

[I'm Watermark]

The second amendment was and is a racist tool to control dark people!
Couldn't have the slaves revolt against understanding wanting to talk it out massa!

Bear in mind that increased restrictions on firearms would lead to a disparity of arms based on class. And in the event of restructuring through force, this would cause problems.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

We are not democratic. I believe the correct term would be polyarchy, or some variation of plutocracy.

The USA is a democratic republic, but it is also a constitutional republic.

From Wikipedia:

"the United States relies on representative democracy, but [its] system of government is much more complex than that. [It is] not a simple representative democracy, but a constitutional republic in which majority rule is tempered by minority rights protected by law."

 

[/MSG/]

We are not democratic. I believe the correct term would be polyarchy, or some variation of plutocracy.

Plutocracy/aristocracy isn't inherently undemocratic.

 

[I'm Watermark]

The USA is a democratic republic, but it is also a constitutional republic.

From Wikipedia:

"the United States relies on representative democracy, but [its] system of government is much more complex than that. [It is] not a simple representative democracy, but a constitutional republic in which majority rule is tempered by minority rights protected by law."

As anyone involved with politics knows, it's so much more complex than that. If the majority rules, why is there a distinct difference between state policy and public opinion?