The Question that Makes Cowards out of Leftists
- Thread starter IBDaMann
- Start date
Your questions asks about how many lefties. When you asked me, and I can only answer for me, I provided one.
No confusion whatsoever. When you asked me, I answered since I'm the only one that can answer for me.
It sounds like Evmetro with that exact same approach of goading when people won't entertain let alone debate his lure discussions.
Did you have a point in starting this thread? If so, express it. Otherwise, you have been correctly identified as a common troll. Garden variety.
Could be. I've had him on ignore forever. I'm sure this guy is next.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Sure. I had expressed it clearly in English but intellectual cowards usually get defensive in their need for further clarification.
I am counting cowards. One way cowards identify themselves is by lashing out at those who ask questions that expose their cowardice. For example, all it took to get you to chit in your pants was the following question:
Do you oppose the killing of a living human who has committed no crime and who has not expressed any desire to die, ... and would your answer change any if the killing would make a third living human's life more convenient?
To any reasonable person this question is easy-peezy-lemon-squeezy. Reasonable people don't run away from this one ... they just answer it, no problem.
Cowards, on the other hand, are ashamed of their support for the killing of living humans and are quick to ask "Why do you ask?" Those in this category are essentially 100% leftists who are mental slaves to some political party and are no longer allowed to think for themselves. Others simply arch their backs and hisssssss and claw and rush for their safe space.
This is the "lashing out" of which I spoke. Notice that you did not just simply answer the easy, straightforward question. Notice that you became snowflake-triggered, EVADED the question and threw up a defensive smokescreen of petty personal insults.
... but we can be fair. Let's give you a do-over.
Do you oppose the killing of a living human who has committed no crime and who has not expressed any desire to die, ... and would your answer change any if the killing would make a third living human's life more convenient?
jacksonsprat22
Verified User
That idiot is a troll.
Yes, he's a troll. The answer to his question is that I don't approve of taking a human life for the sake of the convenience of a third person. Now, I'll make my points.
1. I reject the premise that human life begins at conception.
2. I believe that control of ones body is right protected by the Constitution. That's why a law requiring you to donate a kidney, a liver, or some other organ or body part would most certainly be unconstitutional, even though in not doing so you may be condemning an actual living person to death because it is 'inconvenient' for you to donate.
3. The position taken by the poster is almost certainly hypocritical, my guess is that this person would make exceptions in the case of rape or incest, or does not oppose invitro fertilization, IUDs or the morning after pill.
But those are topics for a serious poster to discuss, and he is not. Which is why he is now on ignore.
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Sure. I had expressed it clearly in English but intellectual cowards usually get defensive in their need for further clarification.
I am counting cowards. One way cowards identify themselves is by lashing out at those who ask questions that expose their cowardice. For example, all it took to get you to chit in your pants was the following question:
Do you oppose the killing of a living human who has committed no crime and who has not expressed any desire to die, ... and would your answer change any if the killing would make a third living human's life more convenient?
To any reasonable person this question is easy-peezy-lemon-squeezy. Reasonable people don't run away from this one ... they just answer it, no problem.
Cowards, on the other hand, are ashamed of their support for the killing of living humans and are quick to ask "Why do you ask?" Those in this category are essentially 100% leftists who are mental slaves to some political party and are no longer allowed to think for themselves. Others simply arch their backs and hisssssss and claw and rush for their safe space.
This is the "lashing out" of which I spoke. Notice that you did not just simply answer the easy, straightforward question. Notice that you became snowflake-triggered, EVADED the question and threw up a defensive smokescreen of petty personal insults.
... but we can be fair. Let's give you a do-over.
Do you oppose the killing of a living human who has committed no crime and who has not expressed any desire to die, ... and would your answer change any if the killing would make a third living human's life more convenient?
This really backfired, didn't it?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I would ask you to stick with the wording of my question and not try to shift semantic goalposts. Leftists are generally required by their slavemasters to endorse and support the killing of living humans who have committed no crimes and who have not expressed any desire to die.
I don't use the word "people" because some WACKY leftists think dogs are people too. I specify "living humans." You shifted to the word "innocent" and that word is somewhat ambiguous. My question specifies the absence of having committed crimes, otherwise one could point to a situation in which someone committed a crime for which the penal code specifies the death penalty.
So, do you support the killing of living humans who have committed no crime and who have not expressed any desire to die ... and would your answer change if the killing would make a third living human's life more convenient?
@ ThatOwlCoward ... I know you are curious to find out whether I counted you amongst the cowards but you cannot ask without revealing that you read all my posts ... so for your convenience the answer is "Yes" ... you have been successfully listed among the cowards ... amont the TRUE cowards in fact ... and you don't have to worry; no one is judging you.
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
Proof?
No I do not. And no the answer will not change.
I would advise you to seek professional help.
christiefan915
Catalyst
I did, too.
christiefan915
Catalyst
So you bring the count to four leftists who are made craven cowards by my simple, easy, straightforward question.
If my question hadn't driven your intellectual cowardice into an outright involuntary panic, you would have just answered my question (in the OP). I'm just sitting back and counting the cowards.
No, you're trolling about abortion.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Just out of curiosity, what's your position on "abortion"?
Agreed. I'm just not getting the NAT gateway to work on my own. It's supposed to be straightforward but I think you're right and that I'm going to have to get some help.
You have a good track record so I'm going to give your suggestion some serious consideration.