The upcoming 2024 PARIS OLYMPICS - what are the odds MUSLIMS launch a TERRORIST attack on it?

[Uncensored2008]

I hope the Jews don't launch any terrorist attacks on Palestine.

Palestine doesn't exist as a country - never has in history.

The Jews don't engage in terrorism - You Muzzie Beasts are behind nearly all terrorism in the world.

Even with OKC, Terry Nickels went to the Philippines to learn how to make bombs from you Muzzie Beasts.

 

[Uncensored2008]

So far it has only been your Messiah’s buddies the Russians

You tell a lot of lies about Americans - you're a Communist - you lie - it's what you do.

But what "Terrorism" do you allege that "the right" perpetrated in America? Protesting against your party?

 

[moon]

Palestine doesn't exist as a country - never has in history.

The Jews don't engage in terrorism - You Muzzie Beasts are behind nearly all terrorism in the world.

Even with OKC, Terry Nickels went to the Philippines to learn how to make bombs from you Muzzie Beasts.

You're wrong. Palestine is mentioned in Greek antiquity. Israel ? No. It didn't exist until 1948.
Still, modern international law trumps historic claims.
Naughty Jews are going to jail.

 

[moon]

https://justplainpolitics.com/threa...shed-such-malignant-stupidity-forever.218814/

 

[Uncensored2008]

You're wrong. Palestine is mentioned in Greek antiquity.

That's a blatant lie.

The Romans were the first to use the name, a mispronunciation of "Philistine."

Israel ? No. It didn't exist until 1948.

Again, you're just a liar for Allah - nothing you say has merit.

Still, modern international law trumps historic claims.
Naughty Jews are going to jail.

Well good luck, terrorist. You've done poorly so far.

If you're thinking Kamaltoe and "The Squad" are coming to your rescue - well, she would have to win - which there is zero chance of.

 

[moon]

That's a blatant lie.

The Romans were the first to use the name, a mispronunciation of "Philistine."



Again, you're just a liar for Allah - nothing you say has merit.



Well good luck, terrorist. You've done poorly so far.

If you're thinking Kamaltoe and "The Squad" are coming to your rescue - well, she would have to win - which there is zero chance of.

You're a simple -minded libelous dumbass. Now apologize- or fuck off.

 

[Lionfish]

 

[Uncensored2008]

You're a simple -minded libelous dumbass. Now apologize- or fuck off.

Not a chance - the translator you used took serious liberties.

Herodutus never encountered any word similar to "Palestine." In the original Greek is was simply "Assyrians."

 

[moon]

Not a chance - the translator you used took serious liberties.

Herodutus never encountered any word similar to "Palestine." In the original Greek is was simply "Assyrians."

Oh sure- " a country which extends southward to Egypt is all known as Assyrians "


Haw, haw...........................................................................haw.

You can fuck off now. You're done.

 

[moon]

Take this with you- the Old Testament is myth. Israeli archaeologists have confirmed it.

' This is what archaeologists have learned from their excavations in the Land of Israel: the Israelites were never in Egypt, did not wander in the desert, did not conquer the land in a military campaign and did not pass it on to the 12 tribes of Israel. Perhaps even harder to swallow is the fact that the united monarchy of David and Solomon, which is described by the Bible as a regional power, was at most a small tribal kingdom. And it will come as an unpleasant shock to many that the God of Israel, Jehovah, had a female consort and that the early Israelite religion adopted monotheism only in the waning period of the monarchy and not at Mount Sinai. Most of those who are engaged in scientific work in the interlocking spheres of the Bible, archaeology and the history of the Jewish people – and who once went into the field looking for proof to corroborate the Bible story – now agree that the historic events relating to the stages of the Jewish people’s emergence are radically different from what that story tells. '

Ze’ev Herzog and the historicity of the Bible - Noah Kennedy

Explore Noah Kennedy's discussion with Dr. Ze'ev Herzog on the historicity of biblical stories. Gain insights from a distinguished Israeli archaeologist

noahkennedy.net

 

[Uncensored2008]

Oh sure- " a country which extends southward to Egypt is all known as Assyrians "


Haw, haw...........................................................................haw.

You can fuck off now. You're done.

You truly are an idiot.

 

[moon]

You truly are an idiot.

Well, I sure made YOU look silly


Haw, haw...........................................haw.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Well, I sure made YOU look silly

By pointing to Philistia (Greek word) and lying that it was "Palestine?"

Haw, haw...........................................haw.

Indeed, @Guno צְבִי

 

[Bigdog]

Oh sure- " a country which extends southward to Egypt is all known as Assyrians "


Haw, haw...........................................................................haw.

You can fuck off now. You're done.

There was never a Kingdom of Palestine in ancient history.

 

[moon]

By pointing to Philistia (Greek word) and lying that it was "Palestine?"




Indeed, @Guno צְבִי

You're a very poor loser. Greek antiquity doesn't ' lie' dumbass. Begone.

 

[moon]

There was never a Kingdom of Palestine in ancient history.

Well, there is now. Suck it up.

 

[Bigdog]

Well, there is now. Suck it up.

What are the borders and who is king?

 

[moon]

What are the borders and who is king?

The borders are the pre-1967 borders- recognized by 145 countries and the UN. King, state, country, all illustrate self-determination.
Have a read of this;

' Yet the ICJ has demolished Israel’s claim that the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip are not occupied, merely “disputed”. The Israeli government has long stressed that there was no “Palestine” whose land it could occupy because, until the six-day war of June 1967, the West Bank and East Jerusalem had been held by Jordan, which has since relinquished any claims to them, and the Gaza Strip was administered by Egypt, which certainly doesn’t want it back.

But the court held that for legal purposes, occupation is the product of a military takeover of land, regardless of its status. Even Gaza has long been occupied, the court found, despite Israel’s 2005 disengagement, because Israel maintained authority over various aspects of life in Gaza that could be exercised when it wished.

That occupation brings into force the fourth geneva convention of 1949 on military occupation, which Israel has ratified. Article 49 renders it illegal – a war crime – for an occupying power to transfer its population to occupied territory, as the court found that Israel has done with its settlements.

Did Palestinian leaders waive these rights with the Oslo accords, which recognized certain Israeli powers in the occupied territory as negotiations were supposed to proceed toward a Palestinian state? No, said the court, citing article 47 of the fourth Geneva convention, which says negotiations between occupier and occupied cannot deprive people of rights under the convention – a wise precaution given inherent power imbalances.

The court’s ruling is thus more than a legal setback for Israel. It is a virtual invitation for Karim Khan, chief prosecutor for the international criminal court (ICC), to prosecute the officials behind the settlements. He should start with the members of the current government who are authorizing their rapid expansion. '

The ICJ has demolished Israel’s claims that it is not occupying Palestinian territories | Kenneth Roth

The Israeli government has long stressed that there was no Palestine whose land it could occupy and that the territories are ‘disputed’. The court has rejected this

www.theguardian.com

 

[Bigdog]

The borders are the pre-1967 borders- recognized by 145 countries and the UN. King, state, country, all illustrate self-determination.
Have a read of this;

' Yet the ICJ has demolished Israel’s claim that the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip are not occupied, merely “disputed”. The Israeli government has long stressed that there was no “Palestine” whose land it could occupy because, until the six-day war of June 1967, the West Bank and East Jerusalem had been held by Jordan, which has since relinquished any claims to them, and the Gaza Strip was administered by Egypt, which certainly doesn’t want it back.

But the court held that for legal purposes, occupation is the product of a military takeover of land, regardless of its status. Even Gaza has long been occupied, the court found, despite Israel’s 2005 disengagement, because Israel maintained authority over various aspects of life in Gaza that could be exercised when it wished.

That occupation brings into force the fourth geneva convention of 1949 on military occupation, which Israel has ratified. Article 49 renders it illegal – a war crime – for an occupying power to transfer its population to occupied territory, as the court found that Israel has done with its settlements.

Did Palestinian leaders waive these rights with the Oslo accords, which recognized certain Israeli powers in the occupied territory as negotiations were supposed to proceed toward a Palestinian state? No, said the court, citing article 47 of the fourth Geneva convention, which says negotiations between occupier and occupied cannot deprive people of rights under the convention – a wise precaution given inherent power imbalances.

The court’s ruling is thus more than a legal setback for Israel. It is a virtual invitation for Karim Khan, chief prosecutor for the international criminal court (ICC), to prosecute the officials behind the settlements. He should start with the members of the current government who are authorizing their rapid expansion. '

The ICJ has demolished Israel’s claims that it is not occupying Palestinian territories | Kenneth Roth

The Israeli government has long stressed that there was no Palestine whose land it could occupy and that the territories are ‘disputed’. The court has rejected this

www.theguardian.com

Those are NOT LEGAL LAWFUL INTERNATIONAL BORDERS.

And you have NO KING.

 

[moon]

Those are NOT LEGAL LAWFUL INTERNATIONAL BORDERS.

And you have NO KING.

The borders are those determined by the UN- not by supporters of the sick Jews, such as yourself.

King, president- all the same to me.