Have you read it?Only in the minds of people who think he is a great deal maker.
He isn't. His book would have made more sense if it had been titled, "The Art of Fucking Up A Deal."
Have you read it?Only in the minds of people who think he is a great deal maker.
He isn't. His book would have made more sense if it had been titled, "The Art of Fucking Up A Deal."
Considering he's a successful real estate investor, AND he has been elected to the office of President of the United States twice, I would say he's a good deal maker!Only in the minds of people who think he is a great deal maker.
He isn't. His book would have made more sense if it had been titled, "The Art of Fucking Up A Deal."
And no witToo much knowledge, and avoiding insane asylums you frequent.
Not according to the constitutionCitizens have rights illegal alien invaders do not.
Why is this so hard for you to grasp?
Because you're whacked that's why.
Exact no, but due process one they doGreen card holders don't have the exact same rights as American citizens.
Correct. They are here as guests, subject literally to the whim of the federal government letting them stay here. The government can cancel them at any time, and they will be deported.Green card holders don't have the exact same rights as American citizens.
This is true, neither do people who are here illegally, but all people appear before the law with the right to due process, that means a court decides what their rights are, not a single person, and they have a right to present their case and have the law applied to them on an equal footing. So if a president says they are not here legally, then a Court should look into that issue and use evidence to see how the law applies to them.Green card holders don't have the exact same rights as American citizens.
WrongDon't try to deny your own posts, anchovies. It never works. You have consistently shown that you don't want the Constitution of the United States nor any State constitution.
You have ignored Article II concerning the election process of the President and his authority.
You have ignored Article III concerning the authority of the courts by putting the SC above the Constitution and courts above the constitutional authority of the President.
You have ignored Article I concerning the authority of Congress, giving it authority it does not have.
You want to federal government to censor social media, ignoring the 1st Amendment.
You want to apply the 1st Amendment to others besides the federal government.
You want to ban and limit guns, ignoring the 2nd amendment and all State constitutions.
You want to force a witness to testify against himself, ignoring the 5th amendment.
You want to limit rights to those specifically mentioned in the Constitution of the United States, ignoring the 9th and 10th amendments.
You want to 'tax the rich', ignoring the 14th and 16th amendments.
DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE DOCUMENT YOU DESPISE!
I already know his answer! He will either say no (which is the truth) or try to lie about having 'read it'.Have you read it?
No, I have not.Have you read it?
Yes, anchovies...according to the Constitution of the United States. See Articles I, II, and III, and the 14th amendment, along with several other amendments.And no wit
Not according to the constitution
Nope. No 'due process' or court necessary. The green card can be canceled and they can be deported.Exact no, but due process one they do
Poor anchovies..................Wrong
Wrong
Wrong
Wrong
Wrong
Wrong
Wrong
Wrong
Wrong
And your personal opinions don’t change those facts
So by your own admission you are full of shit. Call the nurse to change your Depends.No, I have not.
I stand by my comment nonetheless.
Anchovies broke....Poor anchovies..................
No court has any authority to decide any right. Rights are inherent. No court is necessary to 'grant' them.This is true, neither do people who are here illegally, but all people appear before the law with the right to due process, that means a court decides what their rights are, not a single person,
Done. They broke the law, and they are subject to deportation. Deportation is to be applied equally to all who enter the country illegally.and they have a right to present their case and have the law applied to them on an equal footing.
Already happened, Pretender.So if a president says they are not here legally, then a Court should look into that issue and use evidence to see how the law applies to them.
They broke the law. They will equally be deported back to their home nations.We start with the rule of law, not rule of individual people, even if they are president of the United States. That is what substantive due process and equal protection under the law is.
Denying your own posts never works, anchovies. Don't try to deny your own posts.Wrong
Wrong
Wrong
Wrong
Wrong
Wrong
Wrong
Wrong
Wrong
And your personal opinions don’t change those facts
Nope. No 'due process' or court necessary. The green card can be canceled and they can be deported.
They get due process from an immigration court. That is an administrative court. That due process is a very different animal.Exact no, but due process one they do
So you have not read the book, yet you claim you are an expert on it's contents.No, I have not.
I stand by my comment nonetheless.
Appears someone didn’t process the “personal opinions don’t change facts”Denying your own posts never works, anchovies. Don't try to deny your own posts.