As all of the candidates rush on to NH, tomorrow another state chooses who they think should run for their party. Yet we hear nothing about them.
As I said, ignore them. Iowa has a powerful 7 electoral votes... Yeah, that's the important one....Nobody lives in Wyoming Damo.
There's more sheep than people. I don't think they have enough delegates for people to campaign there, especially since south carolina and NH are on deck.
515,000 people who "don't matter".Population of Wyoming = 515,000
Most of the news sources aren't even reporting that they exist at all, let alone that they'll be voting in Primaries tomorrow. That the candidates don't go there makes sense but totally ignoring even reporting on this? Sad.
It's a function of laziness. It doesn't take much to get the reported results over the phone and read them. Your excuses are lame.I don't think the media report much on the primaries and caucuses in Delaware, DC, or Rhode Island either. Its a function of population size, and overall impact on the primary elections.
It's a function of laziness. It doesn't take much to get the reported results over the phone and read them. Your excuses are lame.
I'll bet that until I posted this that most here didn't even know that there would be a Primary in Wyoming tomorrow.
Iowa is not all that indicative of how the US will vote.Wyoming has a voter base which is unlike the majority of the country.
Iowa is more indicitive of what other states will vote . Wyoming is indicitive of ...well... how Wyoming votes.
Iowa is not all that indicative of how the US will vote.