Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission: Raise Gas tax 40cents

Chapdog

Abreast of the situations
So congress creates the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission because Congress declared, “it is in the national interest to preserve and enhance the surface transportation system to meet the needs of the United States for the 21st century.”

So what were there findings? Oh raise the gas tax... yah thats the best things to do.

Here is a list of the panal that thinks you and I can afford a 40cent per gallon increase on gas tax when we just had the largest year of inflation in modern history:

Mary Peters Secretary of Transportation—Chairperson
Frank Busalacchi Wisconsin Secretary of Transportation
Maria Cino Former Deputy Secretary of Transportation
Rick Geddes Director of Undergraduate Studies, Cornell University Dept. of Policy Analysis and Management
Steve Heminger Executive Director, Metropolitan Transportation Commission
Frank McArdle Senior Advisor, General Contractors Association of New York
Steve Odland Chairman and CEO, Office Depot
Patrick Quinn Co-Chairman, U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.
Matt Rose CEO, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
Jack Schenendorf Of Counsel, Covington & Burling-Vice Chair
Tom Skancke CEO, The Skancke Company
Paul Weyrich Chairman and CEO, Free Congress Foundation




WASHINGTON (AP) - A special commission is urging the government to raise federal gasoline taxes by as much as 40 cents per gallon over five years as part of a sweeping overhaul designed to ease traffic congestion and repair the nation's decaying bridges and roads.

The two-year study being released Tuesday by the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission, the first to recommend broad changes after the devastating bridge collapse in Minneapolis last August, warns that urgent action is needed to avoid future disasters.

Under the recommendation, the current tax of 18.4 cents per gallon for unleaded gasoline would be increased annually for five years - by anywhere from 5 cents to 8 cents each year - and then indexed to inflation afterward to help fix the infrastructure, expand public transit and highways as well as broaden railway and rural access, according to persons with direct knowledge of the report, who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because the report is not yet public.

The report also calls for rebuilding and expanding the national rail network to meet a growing demand for alternatives to congested highways.

Continuing to apply patches to the nation's aging infrastructure is "no longer acceptable," and without dramatic changes, "the nation's system of transportation will further deteriorate," according to the report, portions of which were read to the AP.

But the 12-member commission's proposals, which are expected to cost $225 billion each year for the next 50 years, face internal division. The commission's chairwoman, Transportation Secretary Mary Peters, and two other members oppose gas tax increases and were issuing a dissenting opinion to the report calling instead for private-sector investment and tolls.

The gas tax has not been increased since 1993, and recent efforts by Congress to raise it have faltered over the objections of the Bush administration. The tax increase being proposed is designed to take effect in 2009, after President Bush leaves office.

The commission was formed by Congress in 2005 to study the future needs of the nation's surface transportation system, which includes roads, mass-transit systems, ports and rail lines - as well to recommend funding options.

The report comes as state governments and several business groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers, are calling on the federal government to raise gas taxes to pay for substantial transportation improvements. The Minneapolis bridge collapse, which killed 13 people and injured about 100, spotlighted the decaying infrastructure and drew new calls for additional spending.

The Bush administration has said that raising taxes won't cut congestion and creates additional risks for congressional pork, such as Alaska's infamous multimillion dollar "Bridge to Nowhere," which has been scuttled.

In its report, the commission unanimously agreed that measures of accountability were needed to keep watch over state and federal spending.

Besides Peters, the two commissioners opposing a tax increase are Maria Cino, Peters' former deputy who is organizing the 2008 Republican National Convention, and Rick Geddes, a Cornell University professor who has served as a senior staff economist in the Bush administration on the President's Council of Economic Advisers.

---

On the Net:

National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission:

http://www.transportationfortomorrow.org

Transportation Department: http://www.dot.gov/
 
I think you miss the point Chap. It's not that they think you can afford it. It's that they think most can't afford the gas tax increase and still drive at current levels. So the tax increase will serve to discourage driving on already congested roads. The increase in revenue is apparently designed to fix roadways that are in poor condition.
 
the increased price because of taxes might be a wash for a while as demand would drop and theoretically the price for gas would drop as well.

We are still not paying too much for gas as evidenced by both gas demand and sales of big vehicles.

A higher price would encourage exapnding energy alternatives to oil as well.

there is no painless way out of our oil addiction.
 
the increased price because of taxes might be a wash for a while as demand would drop and theoretically the price for gas would drop as well.

We are still not paying too much for gas as evidenced by both gas demand and sales of big vehicles.

A higher price would encourage exapnding energy alternatives to oil as well.

there is no painless way out of our oil addiction.

its not about how much we are paying for the gas.. they are talking about a tax. thats not part of the gas.
 
its not about how much we are paying for the gas.. they are talking about a tax. thats not part of the gas.

It has been a part of our gas price for as long as I can remember.
It may be politically expedient for you to seperate it out, but for me the price I pay at the pump is the price of gas.
'
 
Mark this down ZERO chance of happening.
The dems are not possibly this stupid.
All due respect to dung and the rest of the turbo-libs your talking about $4 gallon. They will be swept out faster than they were put in office. It's a good idea on paper, total loser on reality.
 
Mark this down ZERO chance of happening.
The dems are not possibly this stupid.
All due respect to dung and the rest of the turbo-libs your talking about $4 gallon. They will be swept out faster than they were put in office. It's a good idea on paper, total loser on reality.

Keep in mind that the majority of the commission was appointed by Republicans. Bush appointed 4 members. Speaker Hastert and Majority Leader Frist appointed 2 members each and Reid and Pelosi appointed 2 members each.

Also, I'm not saying it should be done. I was merely explaining the rationale. Chap said they think you can afford it. One of the underlying reasons for the increase is that they think you can't afford it, will therefore drive less and ease conjestion.
 
the nation's road and highway infrastructure are crumbling.

Someone explain to me how we pay to upgrade and fix it.

A 40 cent tax seems painful. But, I'm not jumping to any conclusions.

Maybe we can mandate higher CAFE standards on autos, and phase in a higher gas tax, making the monetary hit on consumers pockets a net wash.
 
Keep in mind that the majority of the commission was appointed by Republicans. Bush appointed 4 members. Speaker Hastert and Majority Leader Frist appointed 2 members each and Reid and Pelosi appointed 2 members each.

Also, I'm not saying it should be done. I was merely explaining the rationale. Chap said they think you can afford it. One of the underlying reasons for the increase is that they think you can't afford it, will therefore drive less and ease conjestion.

driving is a not a option for those how will be hit hardest. what about flying as well.. and shipping costs. this is a horrible idea.


Anyone have the estimate of how many gallons of fuel America consumes per year?
 
ok so what i see is that we pump 160B gallons of gas per year. Not sure if this includes Airplanes and freight.

Thats 64B additional tax per year.
 
Last edited:
400 billion, well that should pay for at least one more year of war.

perhaps 2.

umm Chap is your math right on that ?

LOL edited that pretty quick there Chap.
 
Last edited:
ok so what i see is that we pump 1T gallons of gas per year. Not sure if this includes Airplanes and freight.

That 400B additional tax per year. WTF are we planning to do build platinum bridges and pave golden highways?

the American Society of Civil Engineers report I hooked you up with, says this nation needs 1.6 Trillion dollars to repair our crumbing infrastructure.

Which, suprisingly, is pretty close to the ultimate cost of the Iraq War.
 
In any case the increased revenue would just be a drop in the bucket compared to the revenue that is currently needed.
 
its a tax increase on the lower and middle class who will feel it most.

that is an unusual stance for a republican....
still, that is the way it has been for many years in the USA.

Ok lets just tax the heck out of cars costing over 50K ?
that will leave the poor alone for sure.
 
Back
Top