Trump shared nuclear secrets with friends

floridafan

Verified User
Months after leaving the White House, former President Donald Trump discussed potentially sensitive information about U.S. nuclear submarines with a member of his Mar-a-Lago Club -- an Australian billionaire who then allegedly shared the information with scores of others, including more than a dozen foreign officials, several of his own employees, and a handful of journalists, according to sources familiar with the matter.

The potential disclosure was reported to special counsel Jack Smith's team as they investigated Trump's alleged hoarding of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, the sources told ABC News. The information could shed further light on Trump's handling of sensitive government secrets.

Prosecutors and FBI agents have at least twice this year interviewed the Mar-a-Lago member, Anthony Pratt, who runs U.S.-based Pratt Industries, one of the world's largest packaging companies.

According to Pratt's account, as described by the sources, Pratt told Trump he believed Australia should start buying its submarines from the United States, to which an excited Trump -- "leaning" toward Pratt as if to be discreet -- then told Pratt two pieces of information about U.S. submarines: the supposed exact number of nuclear warheads they routinely carry, and exactly how close they supposedly can get to a Russian submarine without being detected.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/after-whi...ssed-potentially-sensitive/story?id=103760456
 
Months after leaving the White House, former President Donald Trump discussed potentially sensitive information about U.S. nuclear submarines with a member of his Mar-a-Lago Club -- an Australian billionaire who then allegedly shared the information with scores of others, including more than a dozen foreign officials, several of his own employees, and a handful of journalists, according to sources familiar with the matter.

The potential disclosure was reported to special counsel Jack Smith's team as they investigated Trump's alleged hoarding of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, the sources told ABC News. The information could shed further light on Trump's handling of sensitive government secrets.

Prosecutors and FBI agents have at least twice this year interviewed the Mar-a-Lago member, Anthony Pratt, who runs U.S.-based Pratt Industries, one of the world's largest packaging companies.

According to Pratt's account, as described by the sources, Pratt told Trump he believed Australia should start buying its submarines from the United States, to which an excited Trump -- "leaning" toward Pratt as if to be discreet -- then told Pratt two pieces of information about U.S. submarines: the supposed exact number of nuclear warheads they routinely carry, and exactly how close they supposedly can get to a Russian submarine without being detected.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/after-whi...ssed-potentially-sensitive/story?id=103760456

There are some interesting words in all that like, "potentially" sensitive and the "supposed" exact number of war heads and how close they can "supposedly" can get to a Russian submarine.

Someone could say floridafan "supposedly" has a brain. Or "potentially" has the ability to think or a "supposed" idiot.
 
There are some interesting words in all that like, "potentially" sensitive and the "supposed" exact number of war heads and how close they can "supposedly" can get to a Russian submarine.

Someone could say floridafan "supposedly" has a brain. Or "potentially" has the ability to think or a "supposed" idiot.

Is there any crime committed by Trump that you wont support and condone?
 
Is there any crime committed by Trump that you wont support and condone?

Nope. They are fine with Trump giving away the countries most closely held secrets. I'm sure our allies are thrilled.

'Well, maybe it wasn't SUPER secret, so, you know, it's all good. Just Trump being Trump.'
 
Nope. They are fine with Trump giving away the countries most closely held secrets. I'm sure our allies are thrilled.

'Well, maybe it wasn't SUPER secret, so, you know, it's all good. Just Trump being Trump.'

Which secrets? Has been tried for giving away these secrets?
 
Jack Smith has secured the testimony of over 80 people, many of whom Trump shared secrets with or who overheard Trump.

Bye bye.
 
Jack Smith has secured the testimony of over 80 people, many of whom Trump shared secrets with or who overheard Trump.

Bye bye.

Testimony of what? Leaking "supposed" secrets? How would anyone know that what trump was saying was a secret? The court also believed a women when she said trump raped her but she couldn't even say what year it happened. And the court also believes Mar a Lago is worth only $18 million.
 
Last edited:
Testimony of what? Leaking "supposed" secrets? How would anyone know that what trump was saying was a secret? The court also believed a women when she said trump raped her but she couldn't even say what year it happened. And the court also believes Mar a Lago is worth only $18 million.

With 80+ witnesses against Trump he is in deep trouble
 
We are in deep nuclear sub cooperation with Australia ...Trump talking about it was completely appropriate.
 
Notice how when it comes to beating Trump "Surely they would not do that" almost always turns out to be wrong. Keep that in mind when talk gets around to ending the problem by killing him.
 
Months after leaving the White House, former President Donald Trump discussed potentially sensitive information about U.S. nuclear submarines with a member of his Mar-a-Lago Club -- an Australian billionaire who then allegedly shared the information with scores of others, including more than a dozen foreign officials, several of his own employees, and a handful of journalists, according to sources familiar with the matter.

The potential disclosure was reported to special counsel Jack Smith's team as they investigated Trump's alleged hoarding of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, the sources told ABC News. The information could shed further light on Trump's handling of sensitive government secrets.

Prosecutors and FBI agents have at least twice this year interviewed the Mar-a-Lago member, Anthony Pratt, who runs U.S.-based Pratt Industries, one of the world's largest packaging companies.

According to Pratt's account, as described by the sources, Pratt told Trump he believed Australia should start buying its submarines from the United States, to which an excited Trump -- "leaning" toward Pratt as if to be discreet -- then told Pratt two pieces of information about U.S. submarines: the supposed exact number of nuclear warheads they routinely carry, and exactly how close they supposedly can get to a Russian submarine without being detected.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/after-whi...ssed-potentially-sensitive/story?id=103760456


More hysteria by the Democrats when he did not tell anything that was already known

https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-...o-anthony-pratt-us-media-20231006-p5ea8a.html


Saying that members of Australia’s national security committee of cabinet were expected to keep operational details secret “for the rest of our lives”, Birmingham said nuclear-powered submarine secrets were among America’s “most treasured” military assets.

“I’m sure many in the United States will take very, very seriously the suggestion that these types of technologies, and the capabilities associated with them, could be subject to discussions outside of those confined spaces,” he told Sky News.

Joe Hockey, who served as Australia’s ambassador to the US while Trump was in office, downplayed the seriousness of the alleged disclosures by saying: “At a national security level, there is nothing there that we haven’t known for years or that you can’t pull up on Wikipedia.”

Hockey said that US and Australian troops already work on each other’s submarines and there was significant sharing of sensitive military technology between the two nations.

The alleged conversation between Trump and Pratt did not carry implications for the security of the AUKUS pact, he said.

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said: “I will not comment about US domestic issues.”

“You wouldn’t necessarily know the line between fact and fiction,” he added of Trump.

Trump, who polls show is easily leading the Republican presidential field, responded through a spokesperson by calling for the US Department of Justice to investigate what he called criminal leaks.

These “leaks are coming from sources which totally lack proper context and relevant information,” the spokesperson said.

Prosecutors and FBI agents have reportedly interviewed Pratt, who is a member of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club, at least twice.
 
Months after leaving the White House, former President Donald Trump discussed potentially sensitive information about U.S. nuclear submarines with a member of his Mar-a-Lago Club -- an Australian billionaire who then allegedly shared the information with scores of others, including more than a dozen foreign officials, several of his own employees, and a handful of journalists, according to sources familiar with the matter.

The potential disclosure was reported to special counsel Jack Smith's team as they investigated Trump's alleged hoarding of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, the sources told ABC News. The information could shed further light on Trump's handling of sensitive government secrets.

Prosecutors and FBI agents have at least twice this year interviewed the Mar-a-Lago member, Anthony Pratt, who runs U.S.-based Pratt Industries, one of the world's largest packaging companies.

According to Pratt's account, as described by the sources, Pratt told Trump he believed Australia should start buying its submarines from the United States, to which an excited Trump -- "leaning" toward Pratt as if to be discreet -- then told Pratt two pieces of information about U.S. submarines: the supposed exact number of nuclear warheads they routinely carry, and exactly how close they supposedly can get to a Russian submarine without being detected.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/after-whi...ssed-potentially-sensitive/story?id=103760456

Bullshit. Brought to us by the same people that pushed the pee-pee tape.
 
Testimony of what? Leaking "supposed" secrets? How would anyone know that what trump was saying was a secret? The court also believed a women when she said trump raped her but she couldn't even say what year it happened. And the court also believes Mar a Lago is worth only $18 million.

How the fuck is not recalling what year she was raped evidence that it did not happen? I had a cervical fusion operation and had to wear a neck brace for about 2 months. I remember that very well, what year it was I can't recall, about 6-9 years ago. Every person has many memorable happenings in their live they remember well, they don't typically remember the date they happened.

Courts have ruled Trump guilty of raping her as well as fraud. As well they ruled Weisseberg, Trumps CEO guilty and put him in prison for awhile. He soon will be found guilty of a shitload more felonies so you be sure to make an ass of yourself with more excuses why you love him, Heil Trump!
 
Back
Top