Truth? Give me a break? (Open to Everybody)

". more specifically, a living human. Heartbeat (living) + human DNA (human) = living human.'

AND

'What about recognizing that a fetus with a heartbeat and human DNA is a living human?'

Seem pretty similar to me. Just sayin'
 
gfm7175 said:
Heartbeat = living
Human DNA = human

Heartbeat + human DNA = 'living human'.


I don't see any location terms or any self-sufficiency terms present within that definition of 'living human'... do you??
Click to expand...

SO that's how your religious sect defines human? Good to know.

Maybe when you force everyone to be part of your religious sect you can force that on people.
 
Quincunx said:
SO that's how your religious sect defines human? Good to know.

Maybe when you force everyone to be part of your religious sect you can force that on people.
Click to expand...

Correct. This is an objective, legal, constitutional question. IBD instead turns into a quivering pile of emotionally overwrought goo. There is no right to life in the Constitution. If there was, states would not be able to have capital punishment laws. The fact is that the rights of the fetus (due process, etc) are in direct competition with the right to privacy for the mother. These conflicts often occur, and the solution that the court established in Roe seemed like an acceptable and popular one.

IBD is here to lecture you about his moral superiority, at the same time he posts dozens of death porn pictures. His crying and whining is laughable. And the poster you are addressing is his sock. It couldn't be more obvious.
 
IBDaMann said:
What about recognizing that a fetus with a heartbeat and human DNA is a living human? How can that not be absolutely true? Maybe Concart can explain.
Click to expand...

It’s not a human being idiot


It’s a human fetus


And it only exists because it’s inside a HUMAN BEING


That human being gets to decide what happens inside their body


NOT YOU
 
Can't read many posts on this thread, but I'll open up the original one with this:

It doesn't matter, and has never mattered up until this point,
what's true in anything that can be viewed from a political perspective.

We decide what truth fits into our world view,
and we stick to it.
Minds are not changed.

In reality, usually, there is in fact an absolute truth, and at minimum,
one view at least
is completely wrong. Even batshit crazy wrong in some [perhaps many] instances.

Truth as related to reality is almost never a factor, however, in the final disposition of the matter being discussed.

Perhaps when humans someday, with further continued evolution,
approach the intelligence of my Avatar,
we'll get closer to using the truth in some functional way.

Be certain that none of us will live to see that, however.
We'll nonetheless discuss the subject, but it's all just for shits and giggles.
Trust me on this one.
 
IBDaMann said:
What about recognizing that a fetus with a heartbeat and human DNA is a living human? How can that not be absolutely true? Maybe Concart can explain.
Click to expand...

People with penises can be women so anything is possible with this crew.
 
BidenPresident said:
So? It is a living organism. Just admit your opposition to abortion is based on religion.
Click to expand...

Why don't you just admit your favoring abortion lets your character dictate what other ancestors are allowed to believe true and decide what gets classified as untrue by statistical averaging total sum past against current ancestors adapting in space evolving forward now.


Look how cycles of reproduction exist limited to 5 generation gaps per ancestral lineage present. How they arrived historiclaly and which was which genetically added in series parallel evolving of compounding chromosomes per conception.
 
Concart said:
Wow! A tribute thread. I’m honored. Now go grab some Kleenex and your copy of Faces of Death. That should do the trick!!!
Click to expand...

when will you boomers stop advocating for mass murder?

this is why I always say the nazis won wwII.

operation paperclip... etc.

Eugenics in the United States - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Eugenics_in_the_United_States
The American eugenics movement was rooted in the biological determinist ideas of Sir Francis Galton, which originated in the 1880s. In 1883, Sir Francis Galton first used the word eugenics to describe scientifically, the biological improvement of genes in human races and the concept of being "well-born". [10]
Eugenics in the United States: The Forgotten Movement
https://www.nicholls.edu › cheniere › 2021 › 05 › 20 › eugenics-in-the-united-states-the-forgotten-movement
However, an often-overlooked section in the history of eugenics is the movement in the United States. The movement in the early part of the twentieth century exhibits an abuse of the prestige of science and its devastating impact on history.
Volume 2PostersCall for PapersArticles
Eugenics | Definition, History, & Facts | Britannica
https://www.britannica.com › science › eugenics-genetics
What was the American eugenics movement? eugenics, the selection of desired heritable characteristics in order to improve future generations, typically in reference to humans.
The Long Shadow of Eugenics in America - The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com › 2022 › 06 › 08 › magazine › eugenics-movement-america.html
Jun 8, 2022The Long Shadow of Eugenics in America As young girls, the Relf sisters were sterilized without consent. What does the government owe them — and the thousands of other living victims? Mary...
Eugenics: Its Origin and Development (1883 - Present)
https://www.genome.gov › about-genomics › educational-resources › timelines › eugenics
To better understand and protect against current and future discriminatory trends that misuse genetics and, through its association, genomics, this timeline highlights key moments in the development of eugenics, with a focus on the American eugenics movement. Timeline — select a year for more details
Eugenics: Definition, Movement & Meaning - HISTORY
https://www.history.com › topics › european-history › eugenics
Eugenics was popular in America during much of the first half of the twentieth century, yet it earned its negative association mainly from Adolf Hitler and his obsessive attempts to create an...
Eugenics and Scientific Racism - National Human Genome Research Institute
https://www.genome.gov › about-genomics › fact-sheets › Eugenics-and-Scientific-Racism
May 18, 2022By the 1920s, eugenics had become a global movement. There was popular, elite and governmental support for eugenics in Germany, the United States, Great Britain, Italy, Mexico, Canada and other countries.
What was the American eugenics movement? | Britannica
https://www.britannica.com › question › What-was-the-American-eugenics-movement
The American eugenics movement gave rise to laws that mandated the sterilization of—by some estimates—as many as 60,000 disabled people in more than 30 states. The first of these laws passed in Indiana in 1907.
Social Darwinism - HISTORY
https://www.history.com › topics › early-20th-century-us › social-darwinism
Eugenics became a popular social movement in the United States that peaked in the 1920s and 1930s. Books and films promoted eugenics, while local fairs and exhibitions held "fitter family"...
Forced Sterilization and Eugenics Programs in the US | Blog - PBS
https://www.pbs.org › independentlens › blog › unwanted-sterilization-and-eugenics-programs-in-the-united-states
Eugenics was a commonly accepted means of protecting society from the offspring (and therefore equally suspect) of those individuals deemed inferior or dangerous - the poor, the disabled, the...

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=eugenics+movement+in+america&ia=web
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top