Donate your property to the homeless, hypocrite.
Ultra rich unsatisfied: study
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
Donate your property to the homeless, hypocrite.
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
I actually agree with you. Hmm, maybe I should get tested.
evince
Truthmatters
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
Get a sense of humor and S T F U!
So you have no desire to pay for other people's healthcare yourself, just as I suspected.
christiefan915
Catalyst
I'm not the one pretending that rich people are miserable assholes and condemning them (selectively). That would be your soul-mate Desh.
The study says the very wealthy are happier than those with lower levels of wealth:
"Taken together, these results suggest that, among millionaires, wealth may be likely to pay off in greater happiness only at very high levels of wealth, and when that wealth was earned rather than inherited."
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello evince,
The Constitution does not say we will be a capitalist nation.
Our economic system has been left for us to work out as the times evolve.
It has become rather apparent that we need a combination of capitalism and socialism.
The Constitution does not say we will be a capitalist nation.
Our economic system has been left for us to work out as the times evolve.
It has become rather apparent that we need a combination of capitalism and socialism.
evince
Truthmatters
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postal_Clause
Article I, Section 8, Clause 7 of the United States Constitution, known as the Postal Clause or the Postal Power, empowers Congress "To establish Post Offices and post Roads".[1]
The Postal Clause was added to the Constitution to facilitate interstate communication as well as to create a source of revenue for the early United States.[2][3] There were some early disagreements as to the boundaries of the Postal Power. John Jay, in a letter to George Washington, opined that the postal service should not be burdened with the responsibility for handling newspaper delivery, and also suggested that the Post Office be placed under the supervision of the executive branch (a suggestion which later led to the creation of the Post Office Department).[4] Thomas Jefferson feared that the postal service would become a source of patronage and a waste of money. Jefferson also expressed doubt at granting Congress the power to designate post roads, as he considered road building to be a state responsibility.[5]
Article I, Section 8, Clause 7 of the United States Constitution, known as the Postal Clause or the Postal Power, empowers Congress "To establish Post Offices and post Roads".[1]
The Postal Clause was added to the Constitution to facilitate interstate communication as well as to create a source of revenue for the early United States.[2][3] There were some early disagreements as to the boundaries of the Postal Power. John Jay, in a letter to George Washington, opined that the postal service should not be burdened with the responsibility for handling newspaper delivery, and also suggested that the Post Office be placed under the supervision of the executive branch (a suggestion which later led to the creation of the Post Office Department).[4] Thomas Jefferson feared that the postal service would become a source of patronage and a waste of money. Jefferson also expressed doubt at granting Congress the power to designate post roads, as he considered road building to be a state responsibility.[5]
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello evince,
Too funny. So one of them will be perfectly happy if he has as much as another. But the other has to have 2-3 times that much. Tail-chasing fools.
Too funny. So one of them will be perfectly happy if he has as much as another. But the other has to have 2-3 times that much. Tail-chasing fools.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello A-Moose,
LOL!
What good is money if you don't use it to buy lots of things? Houses, yachts, planes, investments, elite memberships.
But then you have to worry about all the things you have. Is everything being taken care of properly? Whoops! Now, all of a sudden you got a lotta stress.
The individual with far less, but still plenty to have the needs covered is not so burdened, freed up to be happier and enjoy the simpler things in life.
LOL!
What good is money if you don't use it to buy lots of things? Houses, yachts, planes, investments, elite memberships.
But then you have to worry about all the things you have. Is everything being taken care of properly? Whoops! Now, all of a sudden you got a lotta stress.
The individual with far less, but still plenty to have the needs covered is not so burdened, freed up to be happier and enjoy the simpler things in life.
Desh never read that far, it seems.
It was not in the article but the study itself. Articles summarizing studies often generalize with headlines to attract attention and leave out important parts of the study.
In another thread the article claimed a study found conservative men are more insecure in their masculinity than liberal men. But, when you read the actual study, it was an internet poll (not representative) which was based on Google searches. It found conservative men were more likely (to say) they would do a search for terms like erectile dysfunction. They concluded that meant the men were more insecure.
It could also mean 1) conservative men were more honest in admitting that they would search for that term 2) liberal men don't care if they have erectile dysfunction (which says something about their masculinity) or 3) conservative men were older and more likely to experience the problem.
Everybody wants enough money to be reasonably secure and comfortable.
Only degenerate sociopaths want gold plated toilets.
In my opinion, after one achieves a reasonable amount of financial security, true happiness is derived from self-improvement, self-enlightenment, spiritual growth, and service to family, friends, and community.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Everybody wants enough money to be reasonably secure and comfortable.
Only degenerate sociopaths want gold plated toilets.
In my opinion, after one achieves a reasonable amount of financial security, true happiness is derived from self-improvement, self-enlightenment, spiritual growth, and service to family, friends, and community.
How could anybody be comfortable in all that impersonal gilded splendor? There's nothing the least bit "homey" about it.
Not your choice to make.
I don't get it.
It is beyond garish and tasteless.
It says a lot about Trump, his character, and his taste, that he has an affinity for the gaudy, the lurid, and the grotesquely ostentatious.