What Happened to those "Scientific" Polls in Nevada?

Watching Clinton win in NV after attempting to suppress the vote definitely shows me she is going to be the D nominee. If you can win after pulling that crap... I can't think of anything short of killing her firstborn in a demonstration of her newfound belief in the supremacy of Satan that will lose it for you.
 
Damocles said:
Watching Clinton win in NV after attempting to suppress the vote definitely shows me she is going to be the D nominee. If you can win after pulling that crap... I can't think of anything short of killing her firstborn in a demonstration of her newfound belief in the supremacy of Satan that will lose it for you.
Click to expand...

She didn't attempt to suppress the vote, stop your lies.
 
I didn't say he's going to win, but it's actually too early to say he's going to lose as well. I did say we can collect a lot of delegates. We have the money and the positioning, and Thompson and Giuliani will likely be out before the end of the month.

Nobody really knows what's going to happen.
 
Watermark said:
Spin it however you'd like, in democracy you don't group voting constituencies so that it advantages one candidate. You put them by their house.
Click to expand...

That's an ugly mischaracterization, its in fact, Cypressesque.

She tried to reduce the accessibility of a certain voting block to the caucasus for her own political benefit.

You're an absolute gas bag if you think she was just trying to "keep it fair".

A big, goddamned, prepubescent, virgin gas bag, with a great deal of musical talent.
 
Beefy said:
That's an ugly mischaracterization, its in fact, Cypressesque.

She tried to reduce the accessibility of a certain voting block to the caucasus for her own political benefit.

You're an absolute gas bag if you think she was just trying to "keep it fair".

A big, goddamned, prepubescent, virgin gas bag, with a great deal of musical talent.
Click to expand...

The way the caucus was designed was to support Obama.
 
Watermark said:
She didn't attempt to suppress the vote, stop your lies.
Click to expand...
Wow, H2O has now become part of the "machine"!

Just keep repeating to yourself... "If Bill Clinton says it, it must be true!"

Soon you will be believing that he didn't "have sexual relations with that woman... Ms. Lewinsky..." and that those documents were just "found" in a closet 2 1/2 years later so heavily redacted (happened while it was in the closet, you know...) that they were nearly unreadable and therefore they couldn't possibly have done anything wrong.... and that stuffing documents (later found to be originals and unduplicated) into your pants and hiding them in a construction site later to destroy them wasn't protecting Billary from something...
 
Beefy said:
What a gas bag. A big puff of hot air, nothing more.
Click to expand...

Why not a puff of cold air? Maybe I'm a reptile?

Still, the charges that she was trying to "suppress the vote" are ridiculous. They sent up special caucus precincts for casino workers. Because of the caucus format, having a lot of people supporting one guy heavily concentrated in a few areas boosts their vote total. It had nothing to do with "suppressing the vote". Why not set up special precincts for farmers in Iowa?
 
Watermark said:
Why not a puff of cold air? Maybe I'm a reptile?

Still, the charges that she was trying to "suppress the vote" are ridiculous. They sent up special caucus precincts for casino workers. Because of the caucus format, having a lot of people supporting one guy heavily concentrated in a few areas boosts their vote total. It had nothing to do with "suppressing the vote". Why not set up special precincts for farmers in Iowa?
Click to expand...
LOL. They were all for it when they thought they had the labor vote, but then they endorsed somebody else... Suddenly it was an "unfair advantage". Therefore those people who had to work while the caucus was full bore must just skip it. It's all good, don't go to vote...

Yeah, it isn't suppressing the vote to change caucus districts at the last second, making it more difficult for people to get to their caucus or even know where it would be held because they changed it within a few days of the actual caucus...

Ignore that a change in Precinct voting areas a full two years beforehand had people running in circles in Florida enough that it was "suppressing the vote" to make that change....

If you keep repeating it, it might even make it as real as your belief that Bill Clinton "never had sexual relations with that woman... Ms. Lewinsky..."

It's all good, Mr. Cog in da Machine...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top