when gov agencies are weaponized (only for the open minded)

As the OP states, this is only for those who are open minded. If your first inclination is to call fake news or label it 'right wing' so you can willfully ignore the material because you don't want to believe it, just skip the thread.

ATF Has Zero Tolerance for Everything But Its Own Abusive Criminality

“The ATF has Weaponized Its Zero Tolerance Policy for FFLs,” Gun Owners of America reports. “These power-hungry bureaucrats wielded the Biden Administration’s ‘Zero Tolerance’ policy for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) as a weapon to retaliate against a gun store that joined us in previous litigation against the ATF.

“The ATF’s conduct in the case strongly suggests that the investigation and subsequent revocation of the stores FFLs was politically motivated retribution,” GOA observed.

“Morehouse Enterprises in North Dakota teamed up with Gun Owners of America (GOA) to fight the ATF’s attempt to regulate unfinished frames and receivers through bureaucratic Fiat,” John Crump elaborated for Ammoland. “Shortly after Morehouse Enterprises filed suit, the ATF launched an inspection of the gun shop.

“The ATF found five policy violations, three of which [were] simple paperwork errors,” Crump explained. “On May 23, 2023, the ATF informed Morehouse Enterprises of its intent to revoke both of the company’s FFLs, even though the second FFL did not have any violations. President Biden has pressured the ATF to shut down FFLs through his zero-tolerance policies.”

In Crump’s article, GOA’s complaint brings to mind two related matters from the past, illustrating the impossible-to-comply-with “standards” ATF inconsistently applies, and another instance that shows the Bureau has plenty of tolerance for its agents lying under oath.

The first abuse of regulatory authority I covered in detail was when the Bureau tried to shut down Red’s Trading Post in Idaho over some minor recordkeeping glitches they cherry-picked, double-counted, and classified as “willful,” all the while calculatedly excluding subsequent audits where no violations were found. An interesting development arising from my coverage, and ATF inspectors being uncomfortable with it, was a warning conveyed to me from a U.S. Marshal threatening to invoke the Court Security Improvement Act of 2007, carrying a sentence of “up to five years,” specifically, “in regard to posting any information with the intent to threaten, intimidate, or incite the commission of a crime of violence against that covered official… ”

Shine a light on armed bullies, and you’re the terrorist.

The second investigation I conducted involved ATF revocation actions against Brinks, Inc. in defiance of policy and law. Follow-up reports detailed how ATF was creating a legal injustice, how the company was forced to turn to the courts to protect itself, and how “serious inconsistencies” in inspections and application of rules were exposed. Their dirty tricks included improperly causing a hearing to be removed from the court calendar, and preventing Brinks from seeking discovery crucial to its case for a scheduled revocation hearing.

Fortunately, both of the above cases had happy endings, albeit forced ones by those who would not give up, including by banging pots and pans to call attention to the injustices. Victory was not the case with FFLs who were arrested for allegedly knowingly selling guns to cartel members while operating a New Mexico gun store.

All of the Reese family members were found not guilty on the most serious charges of conspiracy. Additionally and significantly, money laundering charges against them were dismissed. Husband Rick, wife Terri, and son Ryin were each convicted on lesser charges of making false statements on forms, basically under the presumption that they should have known federal agents were lying. Son Remington was cleared of all charges.

They settled on the lesser charges because they did not have the resources to defend themselves after the government seized their assets. It ended their nightmare ordeal, but not until after they’d been deprived of their livelihoods, freedom, and property, including “approximately 1,191 firearms” and “approximately 4,761 ammunition magazines.”

The cartel allegations, however, reveal yet another area of culpability where ATF’s hands are dripping with blood: In Operation Fast and Furious, ATF allowed guns from stores they pressured to be “walked” to Mexico, resulting in some found at crime scenes, often next to bodies. Those were then traced back to U.S. gun stores, where the incidents were exploited to demand more “gun laws” here. My laboriously documented work breaking and following that story, along with that of colleague and reporting partner the late Mike Vanderboegh, is currently preserved over at the Internet Archive.

And the thing is, Fast and Furious and its resulting deaths would not have happened at all had the then-Democrat-controlled House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform not been deliberately (politically) indifferent to allegations of waste, abuse, corruption, and fraud documented by fed-up whistleblowers on the CleanUpATF website.
Look for our work to continue being buried and effectively unfindable in the archives. Don’t look for the DSM to continue doing anything but ignoring it or dismissing it as extremist conspiracy propaganda.

As long as we’re talking “zero tolerance” for mistakes, any account would be remiss not to cover how the Bureau seized Airsoft guns under the presumption that they were machineguns and how the agent acting as spokesman for the investigation demonstrated his firearms expertise by trying to insert a magazine backward. (And to prove that competency remains consistent over the years, it’s nice to see agents flagging themselves in public to show their superior training over we lesser mortals.)

But forget mere errors. There’s real corruption and law-breaking, such as the story about an ATF inspector “gloriously” arrested in Louisiana for replacing his hotel room door with “a 5-by-4-foot piece of plywood affixed to the frame and the drywall with hinges and screws… The door had two locks attached from the bedroom side and a circular hole padded with duct tape. The deputy noted in the arrest report that the hole appeared to be used ‘in some sort of sexual act.’”

That’s minor league stuff, though, compared to a stunning admission revealed in the Morehouse/GOA complaint we began this article with, in the section (pp 27 – 30) recalling “errors in NFRTR [National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record] records, reports, and queries as well as inconsistent decisions on NFA weapons registration and transfer applications.”

“As far back as 1995, then-NFA Branch Chief Thomas Busey openly conceded that ‘our error rate was between 49 and 50 percent, so you can imagine what the accuracy of the NFRTR could be if your error rate’s 49 to 50 percent,” the complaint documents. (It’s so inaccurate that ATF was forced to drop a case in which the then-president of the American Statistical Association testified that NFRTR data was unreliable for prosecutions and the government plea-bargained down four felony charges to a single $35 misdemeanor and dismissed the case!)
So much for “zero tolerance.” And what would ATF do about its errors? Lie under oath. So much for “willful.”

“In spite of this monumental level of error in the NFRTR (that had not improved as of the 2007 OIG report), Chief Busey stated that ATF’ s policy was to commit what has been called ‘institutional perjury’” the complaint shows.

“When we testify in court, we testify that the [NFRTR] database is 100 percent accurate,” Busey admitted. “That’s what we testify to, and we will always testify to that. As you probably well know, that may not be 100 percent true.”

so, the ATF publicly states that it will lie, under oath. commit perjury in order to obtain convictions, avoid accountability, and create criminals.

https://www.ammoland.com/2023/07/at...r-everything-but-its-own-abusive-criminality/
 
Biden has effectively turned all of his federal agencies into police forces now, going after political opponents and those that disagree with him.

The FBI, the ATF, the DOJ, the IRS, the DOE, the DOA.....we are witnessing a level of tyranny this county hasn't experienced since the British were here.
 
Oaths dont mean anything to the WOKE.....It goes along with there being no truth in their regressive minds and hearts.
 
As the OP states, this is only for those who are open minded. If your first inclination is to call fake news or label it 'right wing' so you can willfully ignore the material because you don't want to believe it, just skip the thread.

ATF Has Zero Tolerance for Everything But Its Own Abusive Criminality



so, the ATF publicly states that it will lie, under oath. commit perjury in order to obtain convictions, avoid accountability, and create criminals.

https://www.ammoland.com/2023/07/at...r-everything-but-its-own-abusive-criminality/

Absolutely correct. The ATF is also unconstitutional. Neither Congress nor the ATF has the authority to ban or limit any weapon.
 
Biden has effectively turned all of his federal agencies into police forces now, going after political opponents and those that disagree with him.

The FBI, the ATF, the DOJ, the IRS, the DOE, the DOA.....we are witnessing a level of tyranny this county hasn't experienced since the British were here.

Which is why civil war is inevitable now.
 
The trials will be on TV and after listening to them, you can apologize for these stupid threads.

you could have just said that you didn't want to read the article so you didn't have to face facts that your precious executive is a tyrant. at least that would have been honest
 
As the OP states, this is only for those who are open minded. If your first inclination is to call fake news or label it 'right wing' so you can willfully ignore the material because you don't want to believe it, just skip the thread.

ATF Has Zero Tolerance for Everything But Its Own Abusive Criminality



so, the ATF publicly states that it will lie, under oath. commit perjury in order to obtain convictions, avoid accountability, and create criminals.

https://www.ammoland.com/2023/07/at...r-everything-but-its-own-abusive-criminality/

What's new or unique about that?

The ATF is a regulatory agency. It follows the general rules of how a bureaucracy runs. One version of those rules can be found in Parkinson's Law.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson's_law

That is the ATF:

Will expand in size and attempt to expand what they regulate.

Will make more and more regulations with the intent of zero tolerance by default. That is, the bureaucratic mindset is more regulations means more need for regulators, means more employees, and results in more power for managers. Total regulation of something is where things go because that's the result of more regulations.

The bureaucracy will always work to its own benefit. If that means it has to lie or cheat to get its way, it will. Accountability is only placed on some expendable under-flunky who probably wasn't even involved if it comes to that. That is, the top management will always insulate itself from accountability.

It will also focus on the trivial.

This is also applicable to any other similar bureaucracy, in government or the private sector...
 
Biden has effectively turned all of his federal agencies into police forces now, going after political opponents and those that disagree with him.

The FBI, the ATF, the DOJ, the IRS, the DOE, the DOA.....we are witnessing a level of tyranny this county hasn't experienced since the British were here.


Interesting.
Is that a good or bad thing?

With the mayhem that Reagan, the Bushes, and Trump inflicted by wiping out necessary regulations,
maybe a little Draconian tyranny was required, no?

And what's more tyrannical than the Bush-imposed Patriot Act?
 
Interesting.
Is that a good or bad thing?

With the mayhem that Reagan, the Bushes, and Trump inflicted by wiping out necessary regulations,
maybe a little Draconian tyranny was required, no?

And what's more tyrannical than the Bush-imposed Patriot Act?

I won't argue with you on the Patriot Act but the democrats supported it also, Obama also upheld it.
 
I won't argue with you on the Patriot Act but the democrats supported it also, Obama also upheld it.

Democrats make bad mistakes too. I've never denied that.

To actually be in the game, however, one has to cast one's lot with one of the two relevant parties,
as distasteful as that sometimes is.

If we had multiple parties that were actually viable.
we would not all be painted with the same brush for being in the same big tent.

Of course, the presidential elections would become useless as all future presidents would then be chosen by the House,
probably after weeks and even months worth of votes,
with coalitions forming and falling apart throughout the process.
 
Democrats make bad mistakes too. I've never denied that.

To actually be in the game, however, one has to cast one's lot with one of the two relevant parties,
as distasteful as that sometimes is.

If we had multiple parties that were actually viable.
we would not all be painted with the same brush for being in the same big tent.

Of course, the presidential elections would become useless as all future presidents would then be chosen by the House,
probably after weeks and even months worth of votes,
with coalitions forming and falling apart throughout the process.

There is no denying that the Patriot Act was the brainchild of Bush.

He is the one that pushed it and used his popularity at the time to get it through congress.

Well actually it was probably Rumsfeld and Cheney who thought of it, not Bush who is generally considered a really good guy now.
 
To actually be in the game, however, one has to cast one's lot with one of the two relevant parties,
as distasteful as that sometimes is.

If we had multiple parties that were actually viable.
we would not all be painted with the same brush for being in the same big tent.

this is a cop out. Instead of accepting your fault and blame for being bullied in to the lesser of two evils voting, you avoid it by calling any 3rd party 'not viable'...............a cop out.

If even half of those who said this stupid shit stuck to a principle and voted 3rd party, even once, you'd see a huge shift in political dynamics of the parties.
 
this is a cop out. Instead of accepting your fault and blame for being bullied in to the lesser of two evils voting, you avoid it by calling any 3rd party 'not viable'...............a cop out.

If even half of those who said this stupid shit stuck to a principle and voted 3rd party, even once, you'd see a huge shift in political dynamics of the parties.

No cop-out. It is reality. We have a 2 party system. The other parties cannot win. Throw away your vote if you choose.
 
it is a cop out. WHY do the other parties not win? ESPECIALLY when so many people complain about the two party system?


It is called reality.
In fact we have several parties, but the big 2 shuts them out. The debates make rules that 3rd and 4th parties cannot meet. If they could, they would change the rules again.
 
Back
Top