Who cares about the national debt?

Robo said:
Do any of the candidates talk about how the federal government's so-called entitlements, corporate and social welfare and thousands of other acts of the feds are actually unconstitutional and offer a plan to return those powers and money to the States to use for that kind of stuff if they choose in accordance with amendment 10?

Who's the real constitutionalist among the duopoly candidates? I submit there are none! Who votes for anti-constitutionalist?
Click to expand...

So you didn't read the plans but think you'll be listened to when you attempt to discredit what you do not know and did not read?
 
no that does not mean the tool is broken


why in your mind is debt great for the private sector but bad for government?
 
evince said:
how do we build needed infrastructure?
Click to expand...

Do you really think spending TRILLIONS in welfare babies, corporate welfare, propping up failing green companies like Solyndra, etc have had ANY positive effect on needed infrastructure?

Do you know ANY welfare queen who showed up to work on the highways?

Stop being silly.
 
evince said:
no that does not mean the tool is broken


why in your mind is debt great for the private sector but bad for government?
Click to expand...

The answer is simple. The private sector HAS TO PAY THE MONEY BACK. The private sector DOES NOT HAVE A PRINTING PRESS FOR DOLLARS. The private sector has to obey rules. There is a bottom line.
 
Damocles said:
So you didn't read the plans but think you'll be listened to when you attempt to discredit what you do not know and did not read?
Click to expand...

So there are no plans by any of the candidates of either duopoly party to return the State's powers to chose or refuse that kind of stuff and return the taxpayer's dollars and get the feds out of their unconstitutional practices, right? Correct me if I'm wrong.
 
reason10 said:
The answer is simple. The private sector HAS TO PAY THE MONEY BACK. The private sector DOES NOT HAVE A PRINTING PRESS FOR DOLLARS. The private sector has to obey rules. There is a bottom line.
Click to expand...



so you think government should be run differently than a corporation?
 
reason10 said:
Do you really think spending TRILLIONS in welfare babies, corporate welfare, propping up failing green companies like Solyndra, etc have had ANY positive effect on needed infrastructure?

Do you know ANY welfare queen who showed up to work on the highways?

Stop being silly.
Click to expand...

did you offer them a job?
 
Robo said:
Return the power to the States to decide social and corporate welfare, healthcare, government retirement plans and every act that the federal government is doing now that's not authorized by the Constitution along with the tax money the feds rape from the States that the feds use to bribe votes and campaign contributions.
Click to expand...
Do you know how many states would fail without help from the Federal government? What would you do about their bankruptcies?
 
evince said:
so you think government should be run differently than a corporation?
Click to expand...

I'm saying if the government was held to the same rules as a corporation, it would be shut down. It's officers would be arrested.

Sosha Curity is a prime example. Ostensibly, it is a huge taxpayer financed annuity. But if the Sosha Curity Administration were held to the same standards as a private life insurance company offering a similar form of annuity (and this would be just in terms of money kept in the reserve account) the officers of Sosha Curity would be arrested and the program shut down, JUST BASED ON THE LAW OF THE LAND.

Government being run differently than a corporation? Where the hell have you been? Government has NEVER been run like a corporation. It has NEVER had accountability forced on it.
 
Rana said:
Do you know how many states would fail without help from the Federal government? What would you do about their bankruptcies?
Click to expand...

If States failed financially without the federal government, it's only because they, like the feds, have instituted socialistic vote bribing programs either by their own State government idiocy, or because of federal mandates to do so. All of those federal mandates would be eliminated along with the fed's involvement in such programs. Taxpayers closer to State government would have more control of the laws/programs they're required to finance.
 
evince said:
did you offer them a job?
Click to expand...

I don't have a job to offer. Why would you ask such a stupid question? I'm not a burger joint; and from where I'm sitting those welfare sluts don't seem to have any real skills outside of biggie sizing french fries.
 
reason10 said:
I'm saying if the government was held to the same rules as a corporation, it would be shut down. It's officers would be arrested.

Sosha Curity is a prime example. Ostensibly, it is a huge taxpayer financed annuity. But if the Sosha Curity Administration were held to the same standards as a private life insurance company offering a similar form of annuity (and this would be just in terms of money kept in the reserve account) the officers of Sosha Curity would be arrested and the program shut down, JUST BASED ON THE LAW OF THE LAND.

Government being run differently than a corporation? Where the hell have you been? Government has NEVER been run like a corporation. It has NEVER had accountability forced on it.
Click to expand...

I asked you a question.


why all the anger from you but no real answer
 
reason10 said:
I don't have a job to offer. Why would you ask such a stupid question? I'm not a burger joint; and from where I'm sitting those welfare sluts don't seem to have any real skills outside of biggie sizing french fries.
Click to expand...

so you hate all poor people an think they are evil?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top