Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
Blame it on Brown people... Ask the Black guy... Thread after thread of Liberal White Guilt on display here today. If they aren't invoking race into the discussion, they are invoking class, and always attacking Whitey. What's up with that? Why do they constantly mistake "illegal immigrant" for "Hispanic" and insist this is what was meant, when it hasn't ever?
Apparently, this presidential election is boiling down to how many white people they can guilt into voting for the black man. Forget about Obama's lack of experience, forget about his devoutly liberal voting record, just remember that you must vote for him or you are a racist. That seems to be the message they want to send. Furthermore, if you vote Republican, you are just clearly a racist, no need to even try and defend yourself.
What is interesting to me is, how they seem to always tie race to class status. It just seems to be a natural liberal assumption that an 'illegal alien' is Hispanic, and if you are black, you are poor because of it. Consequently, if you are wealthy and white, you only got there by taking advantage of other races. With Liberals, it seems to all be about what your color is, and it has absolutely nothing to do with anything else. The only apparent exception to this is women, who only have credibility on important issues if they are liberal.
It's interesting as well, how they immediately discount any examples to contradict their mindset. We most recently had a Hispanic Attorney General, but he was obviously not an illegal immigrant. They currently have a black presidential candidate, who is obviously not poor or the victim of racial discrimination. Condi Rice is a black female, but her accomplishments mean absolutely nothing to liberals, she may as well be a white sheet-wearing male from Alabama. Colin Powell is another good example. It's as if they simply close their eyes and don't notice the color of their skin, if they accomplish greatness, even when they are members of their own party. They have to do this to continue propping up their myths and misconceptions. They simply can't promote this class/race warfare image if they acknowledge the successes of minority individuals.
Racism is the belief that one race is superior or inferior to another. Liberals tend to take this one step further, not only is skin pigmentation a factor, but also, perception of 'usefulness' to society. In the area of Abortion, we are informed that an unborn fetus is sub-human, it doesn't meet the criteria for human rights, while the 'rights' of the liberal pro-abortion female, is all that can be considered. Terri Schiavo can be executed by starvation because her right to live doesn't equal the 'right' of her liberal husband to have her put to death. If Terri Schiavo had been Jenine Gerrafalo, and her husband was Bill O'Reilly, we would have had protests in the streets against the decision to starve her to death! It's all about the ideology of the individual.
In one of the 'false outrage' threads today, Michelle Malkin is attacked for being 'racist', as if no one stopped to realize she is Asian. You see, "right-wing" makes you racist, regardless of what color your skin may be. It's inherently impossible for a black liberal to be a racist, it doesn't matter that they blame all problems on the white race and continually spew hatred and bigotry toward 'white America', they simply can't be guilty of racism. No liberal can, for that matter. They have constructed a 'safe haven' of liberalism to hide behind. They are protected from the charge of being racist because they have taken positions which can be perceived as non-racist to their liberal friends. What is ironic is, many mid-60's segregationists did the same thing.
One American I admire greatly, is Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., who said; "Judge men, not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character." On the surface, this seems to have a simple point to make, but it is more complex than many liberals seem to realize. It means that we should not only avoid judgment of people based on race, but also, on things unrelated to individual character. This includes the group stereotypes we often see employed in liberal class warfare. They will readily acknowledge King's contribution to mankind, but turn around and completely contradict the points he tried to make, in the perverse stereotyping and prejudice against entire groups of people who don't think as they do. It's just as abhorrent as racism against blacks, except it is directed at right-wingers. And they do it without batting an eye, because it is not apparent to them, that this is what they are doing. Liberals are mostly intelligent people, but so are racial bigots. The bigoted racist, like the bigoted liberal, is ignorant, not stupid.
Apparently, this presidential election is boiling down to how many white people they can guilt into voting for the black man. Forget about Obama's lack of experience, forget about his devoutly liberal voting record, just remember that you must vote for him or you are a racist. That seems to be the message they want to send. Furthermore, if you vote Republican, you are just clearly a racist, no need to even try and defend yourself.
What is interesting to me is, how they seem to always tie race to class status. It just seems to be a natural liberal assumption that an 'illegal alien' is Hispanic, and if you are black, you are poor because of it. Consequently, if you are wealthy and white, you only got there by taking advantage of other races. With Liberals, it seems to all be about what your color is, and it has absolutely nothing to do with anything else. The only apparent exception to this is women, who only have credibility on important issues if they are liberal.
It's interesting as well, how they immediately discount any examples to contradict their mindset. We most recently had a Hispanic Attorney General, but he was obviously not an illegal immigrant. They currently have a black presidential candidate, who is obviously not poor or the victim of racial discrimination. Condi Rice is a black female, but her accomplishments mean absolutely nothing to liberals, she may as well be a white sheet-wearing male from Alabama. Colin Powell is another good example. It's as if they simply close their eyes and don't notice the color of their skin, if they accomplish greatness, even when they are members of their own party. They have to do this to continue propping up their myths and misconceptions. They simply can't promote this class/race warfare image if they acknowledge the successes of minority individuals.
Racism is the belief that one race is superior or inferior to another. Liberals tend to take this one step further, not only is skin pigmentation a factor, but also, perception of 'usefulness' to society. In the area of Abortion, we are informed that an unborn fetus is sub-human, it doesn't meet the criteria for human rights, while the 'rights' of the liberal pro-abortion female, is all that can be considered. Terri Schiavo can be executed by starvation because her right to live doesn't equal the 'right' of her liberal husband to have her put to death. If Terri Schiavo had been Jenine Gerrafalo, and her husband was Bill O'Reilly, we would have had protests in the streets against the decision to starve her to death! It's all about the ideology of the individual.
In one of the 'false outrage' threads today, Michelle Malkin is attacked for being 'racist', as if no one stopped to realize she is Asian. You see, "right-wing" makes you racist, regardless of what color your skin may be. It's inherently impossible for a black liberal to be a racist, it doesn't matter that they blame all problems on the white race and continually spew hatred and bigotry toward 'white America', they simply can't be guilty of racism. No liberal can, for that matter. They have constructed a 'safe haven' of liberalism to hide behind. They are protected from the charge of being racist because they have taken positions which can be perceived as non-racist to their liberal friends. What is ironic is, many mid-60's segregationists did the same thing.
One American I admire greatly, is Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., who said; "Judge men, not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character." On the surface, this seems to have a simple point to make, but it is more complex than many liberals seem to realize. It means that we should not only avoid judgment of people based on race, but also, on things unrelated to individual character. This includes the group stereotypes we often see employed in liberal class warfare. They will readily acknowledge King's contribution to mankind, but turn around and completely contradict the points he tried to make, in the perverse stereotyping and prejudice against entire groups of people who don't think as they do. It's just as abhorrent as racism against blacks, except it is directed at right-wingers. And they do it without batting an eye, because it is not apparent to them, that this is what they are doing. Liberals are mostly intelligent people, but so are racial bigots. The bigoted racist, like the bigoted liberal, is ignorant, not stupid.
