BullshitWe honor many hero’s, but they are trying to erase the black ones. Why?
Back under your bridge now
BullshitWe honor many hero’s, but they are trying to erase the black ones. Why?
Agreed. I was against erasing history by destroying Confederate monuments. IMO, it's better to add to history rather than destroy it.Traditionally, there were undoubtedly more monuments to Confederate generals in the South than to black abolitionists and civil rights leaders.
I’m for hauling them off to some museum no one visits. Who the hell honors traitors and losers?Agreed. I was against erasing history by destroying Confederate monuments. IMO, it's better to add to history rather than destroy it.
This from a Harris supporterI’m for hauling them off to some museum no one visits. Who the hell honors traitors and losers?
Undoubtedly this is only in the mess between your ears.Traditionally, there were undoubtedly more monuments to Confederate generals in the South than to black abolitionists and civil rights leaders.
It's that POV which is resulting in the backlash from petty tyrants like Trump and his MAGAt supporters.I’m for hauling them off to some museum no one visits. Who the hell honors traitors and losers?
I’m for hauling them off to some museum no one visits. Who the hell honors traitors and losers?
It's that POV which is resulting in the backlash from petty tyrants like Trump and his MAGAt supporters.
IMO, the best way to move forward from the past is to embrace it. Sweeping it under the rug or, worse, lying about it, only allows it to fester instead of healing.
Memorials to losers isn’t healing, and if you know why monuments were put into place, it solidifies that doing away with them is the right decision.It's that POV which is resulting in the backlash from petty tyrants like Trump and his MAGAt supporters.
IMO, the best way to move forward from the past is to embrace it. Sweeping it under the rug or, worse, lying about it, only allows it to fester instead of healing.
1. Calling them losers is part of the problem. It only fosters resentment in addition to neglecting history.Memorials to losers isn’t healing, and if you know why monuments were put into place, it solidifies that doing away with them is the right decision.
They are losers and traitors.1. Calling them losers is part of the problem. It only fosters resentment in addition to neglecting history.
2. I understand why the monuments were put up. My point is that by burying them, it's akin to the Soviets and PRC trying to stamp out religion or the US War on Drugs. All it does is drive it underground.
3. You can't force people to change their thoughts. IMO, education, especially teaching tolerance, is the better path forward.
Traditionally, there were undoubtedly more monuments to Confederate generals in the South than to black abolitionists and civil rights leaders.
We should agree to disagree on this point.They are losers and traitors.
I see educating people to that fact is the way forward, but the very people who wish to retain the statues also wish to do away with teaching the true history.
The majority of people polled wanted action on the monuments. The disagreement was on whether to destroy them or move them.
I think Confederate generals belong in history books, not in public monuments.Traditionally, there were undoubtedly more monuments to Confederate generals in the South than to black abolitionists and civil rights leaders.