Why Third Parties Can't Win American Elections

Robo

Verified User
Here’s why a third party can’t win an American election.

All you need to do to recognize the fix that’s in is look at the ballot access requirements in every State. Third parties have to spend the lion’s share of their donations hiring folks to pound pavements petitioning the public just for enough signatures to make the ballot. Every State has its own number of signatures for ballot access and that signature requirement is determined solely by the Democrat/Republican Duopoly and intentionally cumbersome to limit election competition.

Secondly, because the Duopoly has total power in America, they get to control news outlet access to government and thereby they create a media “Good Ole Boy” system only willing to play ball with the Duopoly politicians and thereby even controlling the “National Political Debate,” no others need apply.

Thirdly because the Duopoly has total power in government every Special Interest is obliged by unwritten mandate to only pander to and contribute to the Duopoly Parties and the Duopoly candidates because they hold the power and have cornered the market place on politics, laws and regulations.

It’s a fucking racket folks! The bastards of the Duopoly learn from one another which form of bribery works best to capture the idiot’s vote. That’s why Republicans became BIG government socialist programmers right along with the Democrats and that’s why Democrats became BIG government Military Industrial Complex supporters just like the neo-con RINO Republicans. Look closely folks they’re all the same!!!

The American Duopoly is like the NFL, it’s 2 fucking conferences playing the same fucking game. No other’s need apply!
 
Oh Yeah! I shouldn't be forgetting the preposterous excuse of American voters why they don't vote for third parties. "I don't vote for third parties because they can't win."

Translation: "Third parties can't win because I don't vote for them."

And that's the "Self Fulfilling Prophecy." Perfect genius of the ignorant moronic American voter. No wonder the founders attempted with vigor to limit the roll that democracy could play in American government, huh?
 
Here’s why a third party can’t win an American election.

All you need to do to recognize the fix that’s in is look at the ballot access requirements in every State. Third parties have to spend the lion’s share of their donations hiring folks to pound pavements petitioning the public just for enough signatures to make the ballot. Every State has its own number of signatures for ballot access and that signature requirement is determined solely by the Democrat/Republican Duopoly and intentionally cumbersome to limit election competition.

Secondly, because the Duopoly has total power in America, they get to control news outlet access to government and thereby they create a media “Good Ole Boy” system only willing to play ball with the Duopoly politicians and thereby even controlling the “National Political Debate,” no others need apply.

Thirdly because the Duopoly has total power in government every Special Interest is obliged by unwritten mandate to only pander to and contribute to the Duopoly Parties and the Duopoly candidates because they hold the power and have cornered the market place on politics, laws and regulations.

It’s a fucking racket folks! The bastards of the Duopoly learn from one another which form of bribery works best to capture the idiot’s vote. That’s why Republicans became BIG government socialist programmers right along with the Democrats and that’s why Democrats became BIG government Military Industrial Complex supporters just like the neo-con RINO Republicans. Look closely folks they’re all the same!!!

The American Duopoly is like the NFL, it’s 2 fucking conferences playing the same fucking game. No other’s need apply!

BIG BRAINS make fun of you because of this. " Third parties have to spend the lion’s share of their donations hiring folks to pound pavements petitioning the public just for enough signatures to make the ballot."

You clearly think money should dictate who is exposed as a runner.

BIG BRAINS know that money doesn't decide the best president. And this is where we are lost, ever since Citizens United..........clearly.
 
Oh Yeah! I shouldn't be forgetting the preposterous excuse of American voters why they don't vote for third parties. "I don't vote for third parties because they can't win."

Translation: "Third parties can't win because I don't vote for them."

And that's the "Self Fulfilling Prophecy." Perfect genius of the ignorant moronic American voter. No wonder the founders attempted with vigor to limit the roll that democracy could play in American government, huh?

I started Democrat, turned Republican, turned Libertarian, turned VOTER.

I'm happy the party sheeple are as ignorant as they are because I know exactly where they stand. They don't have to use their brain like me, they just conform to their parties platform.

And platform people are easy to debate.
 
BIG BRAINS make fun of you because of this. " Third parties have to spend the lion’s share of their donations hiring folks to pound pavements petitioning the public just for enough signatures to make the ballot."

You clearly think money should dictate who is exposed as a runner.

And someday when you grow up Goober you’ll surely expose your BIG BRAIN and enlighten us how one becomes politically exposed without money, huh Idiot?

BIG BRAINS know that money doesn't decide the best president. And this is where we are lost, ever since Citizens United..........clearly.

Citizens United’s court decision simply confirmed the role money plays in American politics relative to the system created by the Duopoly. The Duopoly of which Democrats are 50%, created the money=free speech system. It wasn’t a Citizens United Or a Court creation, it is a DUOPOLY CREATION GOOBER!!!
 
And someday when you grow up Goober you’ll surely expose your BIG BRAIN and enlighten us how one becomes politically exposed without money, huh Idiot?



Citizens United’s court decision simply confirmed the role money plays in American politics relative to the system created by the Duopoly. The Duopoly of which Democrats are 50%, created the money=free speech system. It wasn’t a Citizens United Or a Court creation, it is a DUOPOLY CREATION GOOBER!!!

So when did the "duopoly" create this sinister system you speak about?
 
So when did the "duopoly" create this sinister system you speak about?

It's apparent to any sane folk that they've been perfecting the dictatorship since the first days they discovered they had the combined collective power to do it and own every partisan asshole who can't discredit the evidence of it I've presented.

So Goober you can attempt to deny it just like you attempted to deny that the CIA was involved in Saddam,'s coming to power in Iraq and the deposing of an elected leader in Iran and replacing him with the brutal Shah. So have at it Goober, I'm excited to communicate.
 
It's apparent to any sane folk that they've been perfecting the dictatorship since the first days they discovered they had the combined collective power to do it and own every partisan asshole who can't discredit the evidence of it I've presented.

So Goober you can attempt to deny it just like you attempted to deny that the CIA was involved in Saddam,'s coming to power in Iraq and the deposing of an elected leader in Iran and replacing him with the brutal Shah. So have at it Goober, I'm excited to communicate.

So in other words, you cannot identify when this sinister "duopoly" you rant about was formed and it's sinister attempts to take over the world; thank you for edifying that.

By the way; do you also believe in chemtrails?

:thisisgettinggood:

And no dunce; the CIA did not assist Saddams reign of terror in Iraq.
 
I don't think that CL said that the CIA assisted in Saddam's reign of terror. I think he said that the CIA was involved in Saddam's rise to power, just like they were involved in the Shah of Iran's rise to power.
 
I don't think that CL said that the CIA assisted in Saddam's reign of terror. I think he said that the CIA was involved in Saddam's rise to power, just like they were involved in the Shah of Iran's rise to power.

...but they werent in either case. But you're a history dunce like he is; how could you know different?
 
Here’s why a third party can’t win an American election.

Our slave master tells us,,,,,,,,,,, through the government ran news and schools and such,,,,,,,,, we only have two choices,,,,,,,,, which is really one choice.

And it seems 99% of us believe and do what our slave master wants us to do.

What's really funny is how many people think we're free, and this police state is a good thing.
 
So in other words, you cannot identify when this sinister "duopoly" you rant about was formed and it's sinister attempts to take over the world; thank you for edifying that.

Actually moron the actual day the bastards first conspired to create the present Duopoly Dictatorship is totally irrelevant to the fact that it exist and fucking idiots like you cannot disavow the reality of it.

And no dunce; the CIA did not assist Saddams reign of terror in Iraq.

Well Pea-Brain, it’s no wonder you’re unaware of reality and factual historical events seeing how you live with your head in your ass up to your shoulders.
 
I don't think that CL said that the CIA assisted in Saddam's reign of terror. I think he said that the CIA was involved in Saddam's rise to power, just like they were involved in the Shah of Iran's rise to power.

Numb-Nuts is not interested in facts even when he's been bashed over his little pea head with them. He's a fucking RINO zombi partisan in denial.
 
Our slave master tells us,,,,,,,,,,, through the government ran news and schools and such,,,,,,,,, we only have two choices,,,,,,,,, which is really one choice.

And it seems 99% of us believe and do what our slave master wants us to do.

What's really funny is how many people think we're free, and this police state is a good thing.

We're conducted like a brass band by a fucking gang of crooked politicians that proclaim they've preserved our freedom by regulating the amount of water we can have in our toilets and what kind of fucking light bulbs we can have in our lamps.

Free to do what?????
 
We're conducted like a brass band by a fucking gang of crooked politicians that proclaim they've preserved our freedom by regulating the amount of water we can have in our toilets and what kind of fucking light bulbs we can have in our lamps.

Free to do what?????
what, of any real, practical significance to your life, are you NOT free to do?

Does trying to save our dwindling fresh water resources by limiting the amount we throw away along with our piss and shit really hem you in somehow?
 
what, of any real, practical significance to your life, are you NOT free to do?

Does trying to save our dwindling fresh water resources by limiting the amount we throw away along with our piss and shit really hem you in somehow?

I could argue at length about just how “dwindling” our water supply really is and earth’s natural filtration system including solar rain events, but that’s another thread. For purposes of just answering your post here I’ll simply say if the bastards in Washington think they are smart enough to regulate toiletry they could at least be smart enough to design a fucking toilet that worked and why the fuck they mandated that we replace our good ole incandescent light bulbs with these fucking twisted dim bastards with poison in them only proves to me the sons-of-bitches are insane.

“Of real practical significance to my life?” How about allowing me to make my own “FREE” decisions about what goes into my own body and what doesn’t? How about allowing me to “FREELY” decide where and what I spend my own money on instead of government putting the gun in my back taking my money and fucking wasting it or bribing votes with it for themselves? How about a level playing political playing field with rules fair and inviting to every candidate aside from party or ideology and FREE and FAIR elections providing more choices and absents of corruption? Rational ballot access? Media access? National Debate access? What about the 17 trillion $ of National Debt and the future robbery of my descendants and future descendants who will be enslaved to it?

Maybe the question should be “Just what of any real significance are we actually free to do?” Huh?
 
Back
Top