Why are you enabling his ignorance?
So now its ignorance not bigotry?
Why are you enabling his ignorance?
You're really over the top on this one. Bigotry to me is someone calling all Muslims "barbarians," or something along those lines (which happens a lot here, btw, without nearly as much consternation as we've seen on this thread - without any, actually). A finer point about what consititutes membershiip to a religion? It just doesn't rise to that level, or near that level. Total faux outrage from you on this.
Oh, well because Romney is a Mormon and if Rubio was born a Mormon then there is zero chance that doesn't come up if Rubio is on the ticket.
Well, I laugh at all religions so, whatever you want to think of me that's fine. I don't care about that. I laugh at Buddhists too just for the record.
Nonsense. This same guy who makes fun of the "magic underwear" in threads of the past suddenly has a good view of Mormons? He's mocked them consistently and now decides he wants to say Rubio is one because he thinks it will reflect on him negatively. This same guy who thinks that saying, "I don't hate Mormons I sleep with their wimmin!" means that he's being open minded about the religion...
He's a bigot, Onceler. And you are enabling him.
I don't disagree that there are evangelicals that may not vote for a Mormon. The same thing was said about Kennedy. But Rubio is not a Mormon. Not in the least. No one outside of Jarod sees Rubio as a Mormon. So tell us Darla... why do you think Jarod wanted to pretend Rubio was Mormon?
Give me a break. Only a complete idiot would care that Rubio's parents decided to baptize the kid as a Mormon. That was completely out of his control.
Give me a break. Only a complete idiot would care that Rubio's parents decided to baptize the kid as a Mormon. That was completely out of his control.
There is a difference between laughing and derisive mockery. I'll grant that, but ignoring the derisive mockery from the past to enable the spread of ignorance in another doesn't change that you are enabling a bigot.
If I say something they dont belive to be true about Mormons, not even anything bad about them, they are all over it screaming bigot!
If others on this board call Muslams names or claim they are all violent hate mongers... they dont even respond.
There is stuff in Mormonism that is WAY nuttier than what is being discussed on this thread. To me, almost all religions have practices that are nutty. The more recent ones seems nuttier, because they are not as established - think Scientology. But just because some branches of Christianity are older, that doesn't make the practices they have less nutty to me. If you think about it and really look at them objectively, they basically all of characteristics of what we consider as cults.
Does that make me a bigot?
There is a difference between laughing and derisive mockery. I'll grant that, but ignoring the derisive mockery from the past to enable the spread of ignorance in another doesn't change that you are enabling a bigot.
Just
Ike Obama eating dog, but some people don't care, the sins of the father, blah, blah...
That is from your OP. It is blatantly false. Yet you continue to pretend it is true.
right there you pretend Rubio is a Mormon. There is no other explanation for your question other than you wanted to pretend there would be two Mormons on the ticket.
If you feel that is wrong, then tell us why you posted that to begin with?
He brings forth a topic for discussion and you rush in to call him a bigot. I thought discussion is what this board is about. I seriously don't read Jarod as a bigot. I think you are hyper sensitive about him for some unknown reason.
He brings forth a topic for discussion and you rush in to call him a bigot. I thought discussion is what this board is about. I seriously don't read Jarod as a bigot. I think you are hyper sensitive about him for some unknown reason.
There is stuff in Mormonism that is WAY nuttier than what is being discussed on this thread. To me, almost all religions have practices that are nutty. The more recent ones seems nuttier, because they are not as established - think Scientology. But just because some branches of Christianity are older, that doesn't make the practices they have less nutty to me. If you think about it and really look at them objectively, they basically all of characteristics of what we consider as cults.
Does that make me a bigot?
That is complete bullshit Jarod. Those bigots, like you, get called out for that as well. Which is why many of us have Webb on ignore.
No matter how much the enablers support you, it won't change why you started this thread. No matter how innocent you want to pretend to be, you started this to bash religious views. The only thing I am not certain of is whether you wanted to bash Mormons or Evangelicals. I lean towards the latter.