zappasguitar
Well-known member
Again the coward bravo won't answer...he just posts another petty evasion, why is that?
Well, who the hell knows how this outfit calculated the differential. I took a look at Senator Feinstein's disclosure just for giggles and you have three women (or traditionally female named individuals) that worked only a few days as staff assistants and made only a few hundred bucks. That's going to skew things downward severely.
LOL - so it's full-time staffers. Do you think all staffers make the same salary?
I'll break it down for you as simply as I can. Let's say I'm a new Senator, and they only give me budget for 2 employees - I can hire a senior aide for $80K, and a receptionist for $20K. If I hire a man for the former and a woman for the latter, the Free Beacon would then report a huge disparity between how much I pay both. Because there is.
Get it yet, dumbo?
Well, I think you may have a story about senators not hiring women to senior staff positions, but you don't have a pay disparity story.
you're acting just like bravo. the fact is, we can't know unless we know experience, education and level of the employees.
Well, I think you may have a story about senators not hiring women to senior staff positions, but you don't have a pay disparity story.
Key word in my post that you seem to be ignoring is "may."
but you don't have a pay disparity story.
you can't even read your own posts?
![]()
Yes, I can. I know that you don't have a pay disparity story because I know how these offices operate. You may need more information to know that there is no may disparity story, but I don't.
LOL - so it's full-time staffers. Do you think all staffers make the same salary?
I'll break it down for you as simply as I can. Let's say I'm a new Senator, and they only give me budget for 2 employees - I can hire a senior aide for $80K, and a receptionist for $20K. If I hire a man for the former and a woman for the latter, the Free Beacon would then report a huge disparity between how much I pay both. Because there is.
Get it yet, dumbo?
No, of course not.....the women staffers are paid less than their male counterparts....fool
And you think a woman in a lower position on the staff should make as much as a man who is in a much higher position - who has more seniority, more experience & qualifications?
LOL
Didn't Blabo insist that Sandra Fluke is a slut?
Then he spent a while claiming there was no sexual connotation to the slur.
Poor Blabo.
Hire men for the higher paying positions and women as the gofer peon slots......hypocrisy is hypocrisy no matter how you disguise it....
Or do you thing women are too stupid for those higher paying positions ?
Is that gonna be your next new dance step ?
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
Must make excuses for Democrats
LOL - at least you get how stupid your initial premise is now. That's a big step for someone as braindead as you, bravs - congrats.
No - I don't hold Senators to the standard that every top aide hired should be a woman. That's not their complaint. Their complaint is the women who hold the SAME POSITION as men often make less, even if experience & qualifications are the same.
I love what you wrote above, btw - who is dancin' now, bravs? LOL