Billy the Great Khan
Uwaa OmO
Fine. And if the wages aren't enough to survive on, then tough shit - be homeless, go without basic needs, etc. That's your assertion, correct?
Well, let's use an analogy here. Who should I go to to bail me out if I gamble my mortgage payments away? It's the same thing. My poor choices have lead to the same conclusion.
We're both arguing general instead of specific. In the current housing market, renting is a suckers game in the first place, it's not cheaper than most mortgages (certainly not cheaper than mine). Now if you wanted to argue about shady practices or something of a specific industry or company, then by and large I'd be on board with you. But you're not. You're arguing that people, on the very virtue of them being alive, should be guaranteed something that I have had to work for. So if I do not receive a proportionate rise in my quality of living because I have a set of valuable skills, what sort of motivation do I (the general I) have to build said set in the first place? If the reward does not match the effort, it isn't a reward. Therefore I (again, general I), will take the path of least resistance. If I can live on my own on a part time fry cooks wage, why should I go to school, or learn a trade? Sure I won't be making CEO pay, but that's unlikely at best even with education and/or expert skills, so why try if the standard of living for effort is not significantly different from the standard of no effort?