Do you wish Clinton could run again?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date

Do you wish Clinton could run again?

  • Yes

    Votes: 3 50.0%
  • No

    Votes: 3 50.0%

  • Total voters
    6
Democrats pining for Clinton like Republicans pining for Reagan. :)

True is that they both left a disastrous stench that still lingers today.

Clinton took the Democratic Party down the road of being just another corporate-owned political party. Under Clinton, democrats lost all semblance of committment to the common people.
 
time is a river, "relax and flow downstream" ( feeling Beatleish this AM -50th anniversary of their contract with EMI).

I'd like to see FDR or G. Washington back in office. LOL. Obama has shown me nothing, out of touch, doubtful if he understands that perpertual Keynesianism,
isn't going to work this time.

Perpetual wars aren't going to stop AQ. That said Romney is even worse -think i'm going for Gary Johnson (liber). Vote for the best man. best i know of.
 
time is a river, "relax and flow downstream" ( feeling Beatleish this AM -50th anniversary of their contract with EMI).

I'd like to see FDR or G. Washington back in office. LOL. Obama has shown me nothing, out of touch, doubtful if he understands that perpertual Keynesianism,
isn't going to work this time.

Perpetual wars aren't going to stop AQ. That said Romney is even worse -think i'm going for Gary Johnson (liber). Vote for the best man. best i know of.

Well said.
 
Get it stright!!!

Good Economy Under President Clinton = PURE LUCK
Bad Economy Under President Obama = ALL HIS FAULT
 
"It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is."
-William Jefferson Clinton

I would not want to see Clinton run for office again. He is a very smart man - even wise about some things - but he sure did some stupid things. Moreover, he showed a defect of character that made him fatally flawed in his position of leadership; which cannot be countenanced. He had his innings, good and bad; that is enough.
 
Clinton was the death of liberalism in the United States. Let him rot in obscurity. We have a aggressive war being waged against the American people by rightists in the Untied States. Their is no room for appeasers.


Clinton was getting his bjs and staying out of Gringrich's way,....signing what the Republican Congress put in front of him.....that worked for me.....
 
In fact, the new hotels are the first significant private-sector construction in Port-au-Prince in the two years since the quake.

"Cautious optimism and deep skepticism" is how economist Claude Beauboeuf describes Haiti's hotel boom. For people to fill the hotels, he said, it's important that President Michel Martelly address the problems facing his government, which include an illegal force of armed men openly roaming the country, a string of mysterious police killings and strife with the opposition-controlled Parliament. He also needs a prime minister to replace the outgoing one who resigned after clashing with the president over priorities.

"If he doesn't address these things, investors will withdraw," Beauboeuf said, citing Club Med and the Holiday Inn as earlier examples of franchises that left Haiti because of political instability.

The planned hotels in the capital are not aimed at tourists, who avoid gritty Port-au-Prince. Instead, developers are targeting the contractors, foreign aid workers and diplomats for whom finding a room can be a challenge. The Clinton Bush Haiti Fund, led by the previous two U.S. presidents, identified new business-class hotels as key to attracting foreign investors looking for opportunities in Haiti. Similarly, President Martelly has said he wants to make Haiti less dependent on foreign aid and friendlier to outside investments.

http://www.clintonbushhaitifund.org/news/entry/new-hotels-arise-amid-ruins-in-haitian-capital/

Good out come, considering Haiti was ungovernable for decades, then the quake,..hopeful the country can self substain.
We should be working with Cuban investment too. Havana needs to be rebuilt.
 
He tried to enact a liberal agenda, realised there was no money available, then worked on the deficit.
Spin it however you need to to feel good about yourself.

He lost in the mid-term elections huge and changed due to pragmatism, again pragmatism in a President is not a bad thing...

This "He realized there was no money available" stuff is just revisionism. And can you tell me why Obama can't realize there is no money available?
 
Back
Top