No evidence White House involved in ‘Fast and Furious’

It is a fact that he was killed with a bullet from an assault rifle.
It is a fact that assault rifles from F&F were found on site where he was killed, used by those that killed him.

The bullet was too badly damaged to confirm which weapon it came from. I know it is hard for lemmings to connect the dots as you are used to your masters drawing the pictures for you.

Thank you, so there is no proof, just speculation. I may be a lemming, but facts are facts and connecting the dots is connecting the dots.

I hope you are never tried on just connecting the dots, the dots can sometimes be wrong.
 
Thank you, so there is no proof, just speculation. I may be a lemming, but facts are facts and connecting the it's is on necking the dots.

I hope you are never tried on just connecting the dots, the dots can sometimes be wrong.

LMAO... speculation? Ok... keep on apologizing
 
Do go on apologizing for Obama and for those that hate brown people. We already know you hate brown people due to your constant attacks on Rubio. So it is not a shocker that you want to defend Darla and her ilk who won't ever care about the dead Mexicans.

You have fallen to Bravo status.
 
Do go on apologizing for Obama and for those that hate brown people. We already know you hate brown people due to your constant attacks on Rubio. So it is not a shocker that you want to defend Darla and her ilk who won't ever care about the dead Mexicans.

Oh, brother...
 
It isn't apologizing, it is looking at the actual facts of the case. It is what our justice system must do.

Facts:
Assault rifles found on site used by those that killed agent
Assault rifles were from F&F
Assault rifle bullet is what killed agent
Assault rifle bullet that killed agent is too badly damaged to determine for sure which weapon it was fired from

Democrats response:
There is no proof he was killed by a F&F weapon.

By your response Rana, there is no way a conviction could ever occur because you can never match the bullet to any gun.
 
Superfreak, I am leaving the thread because you have devolved and now are just spouting nonsense.

LMAO... funny how you don't have a problem with the others that are spouting nonsense. Tired of apologizing for them? or just running away from the actual facts?
 
Facts:
Assault rifles found on site used by those that killed agent
Assault rifles were from F&F
Assault rifle bullet is what killed agent
Assault rifle bullet that killed agent is too badly damaged to determine for sure which weapon it was fired from

Democrats response:
There is no proof he was killed by a F&F weapon.

By your response Rana, there is no way a conviction could ever occur because you can never match the bullet to any gun.

So you have no link? How many assault rifles are in existance? What about the Second Amendment?
 
So you have no link? How many assault rifles are in existance? What about the Second Amendment?

A link to what Jarod? Darla provided the link. Are you too stupid to click on it?

Tell us Jarod, how many assault rifles are in existence?

What about the Second amendment?
 
A link to what Jarod? Darla provided the link. Are you too stupid to click on it?

Tell us Jarod, how many assault rifles are in existence?

What about the Second amendment?

Why do you hate the Second Amendment? Why are you attacking the right to carry Assasult rifles?
 
Never said that. You used the term "murder" in response to my statement that I have not seen illegal conduct. Giving a gun to a criminal is not murder. It may be stupid, but it isn't murder.




I wouldn't call it an "act of war," that's for goddamned sure, particularly if said other government was our third largest trade partner. But that's just me.

LOL giving a gun to a murderer would make one an accomplice. You are really an ignorant person for such a big-mouth know-it-all
 
Back
Top