Pretty thuggish behavior. If the officers had a legitimate mission why did they feel compelled to bust up the security cameras?
To be clear...this wasn't the Feds.Dorian Brooks had no choice but to let officers walk all over him—literally.
“I felt 300 pounds on my neck,” Brooks told reporters at NBC Los Angeles. Brooks, a volunteer employee at THC Downtown Collective, a Long Beach, CA medical marijuana dispensary, was arrested June 19 during a police raid of the pot shop. Footage from the dispensary’s security camera reveals a brutal bust, including cops walking on Brooks’ back and standing on his neck, while officers prepare to handcuff the suspect. “I just felt violated and disrespected,” said the 28-year-old volunteer, one of five arrested in the raid. “We got beat up and arrested for a citation that’s equivalent to someone jaywalking.”
Brooks filed a lawsuit against the Long Beach PD this week, claiming the police used unnecessary violence in the raid, on top of destroying property and evidence. Surveillance videos show an undercover cop smashing the store’s video camera with a metal rod, while post-raid footage reveals complete destruction, with knocked over cabinets, boxes and files strewn across the floor.
Although police admit the dispensary was compliant with California state law, Long Beach PD said the raid was ordered because the store was operating without a city permit
http://reason.com/blog/2012/07/05/police-stand-on-volunteers-neck-destroy
"I feel violated for the cops busting me commiting a crime. Bad cops, they shoulda let me go and continue to commit crimes. Next time I'm going to rob a bank I'm expecting them to hold the door open for me and make sure I get away clean. After all anything else would be police brutality."
(Sigh)
correct. not this one. They're all booked up with the jack booted policyTo be clear...this wasn't the Feds.
OLYMPIA, Wash. -- Several states have started reassessing their medical marijuana laws after stern warnings from the federal government that everyone from licensed growers to regulators could be subjected to prosecution.
The ominous-sounding letters from U.S. attorneys in recent weeks have directly injected the federal government back into a debate that has for years been progressing at the state level. Warnings in Washington state led Gov. Chris Gregoire to veto a proposal that would have created licensed marijuana dispensaries.
Letters with various cautions have also gone to officials in California, Colorado, Montana and Rhode Island.
Obama's Sudden, Senseless Assault on Medical Marijuana
Posted: 05/05/11 When Attorney General Eric Holder announced in October 2009 that the Dept. of Justice would respect state medical marijuana laws, the nation breathed a collective sigh of relief. By that time, any lingering support for aggressive federal raids on medical marijuana providers had dwindled into invisibility. The American people wanted to see patients protected, and Obama's pledge to do so earned him nothing but praise from both the press and the public.
Unfortunately, recent months have brought about what can only be described as the rapid collapse of the Obama Administration's support for medical marijuana. Following dozens of aggressive DEA raids, along with some unusual IRS audits, the Dept. of Justice has now begun openly endeavoring to destroy carefully regulated state programs before they get off the ground:
It's a sweeping intervention that instantly divorces the Obama Administration from its stated policy of not focusing resources on individuals who are clearly compliant with state law. Unlike the numerous recent dispensary raids, which could theoretically result from competing interpretations of state law, this new incursion constitutes a direct threat of arrest against state employees acting in good faith to administer perfectly lawful state programs.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/scott-morgan/obama-medical-marijuana_b_857852.html
My best guess is that Obama doesn't really want a second term.
Here's what is happening on the local level - proximate caused by Fed'l policy."a fooled man won't get fooled again" (Bush)![]()
I doubt it, the partisians who ignore Obama's wars on weed. drones, escalation of Afpak, NDAA, destruction of Libya, etc. will still vote for the warmonger.
I won't Here's what is happening on the local level - proximate caused by Fed'l policy.
http://forfeiturereform.com/2012/05...-amendment-will-stop-medical-marijuana-raids/
Will the Rohrabacher-Hinchey-Farr Amendment End DEA Raids of State-Legal Dispensaries?The Amendment reads:
None of the funds made available in this Act to the Department of Justice may be used, with respect to the States of Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington, to prevent such States from implementing their own State laws that authorize the use, distribution, possession, or cultivation of medical marijuana.
If this amendment passes, I predict that the DEA will continue raiding state-legal marijuana dispensaries.
The justification will be that while any state can “implement their own State laws” regarding medical marijuana the amendment does not (explicitly) prohibit the enforcement of federal law criminalizing all aspects of marijuana, and a court is likely to sanction the interpretation that a federal agency can enforce federal law without “preventing” states from “implementing” their own laws.
Nor does the Rohrabacher-Hinchey-Farr Amendment provide an affirmative defense for defendants caught in the federal medical marijuana crackdown.
In other words, the Rohrabacher-Hinchey-Farr Amendment provides only the barest of restrictions on the actual conduct of the Department of Justice and its subsidiary agencies towards medical marijuana. And before we finish beating this horse
, I should note the Amendment does not reach non-DOJ agencies like the IRS, who are also currently part of the federal crackdown on medical marijuana.And…this Amendment would also not prevent state or local agencies from enforcing the federal law at the behest of the Drug Enforcement Administration. How is this the case? Keep reading…
Beyond Appropriations: Asset Forfeiture Allows for Agency Independence
A basic, structural feature of Drug War funding are the federal asset forfeiture laws that drive hundreds of millions of dollars of seizure revenue into funds not appropriated by Congress but by the Department of Justice itself. I’ll excerpt this overview from the FY 2013 Performance Budget of the Asset Forfeiture Fund of the Department of Justice:
Corporate whore to Big Pharama.OK, so what is Obama's motivation?
Corporate whore to Big Pharama.
Sativex is an oral spray invented in Britian, it has THC and CBD (cannibinoids). It's under FDA approval process, it's suppsed to use the whole plant, but just uses the 2 main cannoibinoids.
What will happen, is sativex - because it's not smokes, and the DEA refuses to recognize smoked weed as medicinal - will supplant medical marijuana.
Big Phara has a lot of lobby power, instrumental in writing the AFHC Act. Also the DEA pressure is relentless, and Obama CAVED ( again) to the presure.
You'd have to read the Rolling Stone interview in ful to get a comprehensive idea -let me find it.
In other words, because of the numerous cannibinoids NOT in Sativex -taht allows futire patenting by adding a cannibinoid or 3 at a time - in effect giving Big Pharam excluse patent rights to marijuana sprays.
There is a guy who posts as Dharma Bum who already uses the "whole plant ( sativex does not) ina spray form that is very effective.
But Big Phama doersn't want these local mfg/s to get in on the incredible potential for cannibinoids; thus trying to stamp out not only medical marijuana, but any atempt to market an oral spray -they want control and profits.
Let me see if I can find the Rolling Stone interview. a msut read, distills this down to a read.
.Attorney General Eric Holder was a guest of The Huffington Post at the correspondents’ dinner. Before it began, a HuffPost reporter noted to Holder that Obama’s reference to “congressional law” was misleading because the executive branch could simply remove marijuana from its “schedule one” designation, thereby recognizing its medical use.
“That’s right,” Holder said
how many ppl know about this? how many really care about the suffering whom need relatively cheap weed ( as opposed to an expensive patented medical spray?. Not many.Not seeing how this helps Obama get re-elected.