You didn't expound upon it until I asked. Now you have, awesome.
Then what's your problem?
You didn't expound upon it until I asked. Now you have, awesome.
The title, 'He's not like us', leaves the door wide open to the myriad descriptions of why he's a poor choice to represent us. One would think, anyway.
Then what's your problem?
The title, 'He's not like us', leaves the door wide open to the myriad descriptions of why he's a poor choice to represent us. One would think, anyway.
First off, his religious beliefs are NOBODY'S business and should NEVER bar him from office. Second, yes, they will vote for him because they detest Obama like the left detested Bush. The truth is there is so little difference between the two that it does not matter. Conservatives have shut off their dogmatic brain center and would vote for ANY candidate that had an R behind his name. If they had a conservative bone in their bodies they would vote for Johnson.
First off, his religious beliefs are NOBODY'S business and should NEVER bar him from office. Second, yes, they will vote for him because they detest Obama like the left detested Bush. The truth is there is so little difference between the two that it does not matter. Conservatives have shut off their dogmatic brain center and would vote for ANY candidate that had an R behind his name. If they had a conservative bone in their bodies they would vote for Johnson.
Other than Ken being literally retarded? Nothing.
His actions and subsequent dishonesty about his tenure at Bain Capital as it's sole stock holder, CEO and Chairman of the board alone disqualify him. Nothing to do with his ill gotten wealth. His sociopathic remarks and attitudes further exacerbate his lack of qualifications to lead an otherwise sane nation. Nothing to do with his cult of religion. The thousands of unanswered questions concerning his offshore banking habits and tax evasion practices also disqualify him. What more are you looking for?
Please accept my most sincere apologies. You cats change screen names like your underwear and I get confused sometimes.
The title, 'He's not like us', leaves the door wide open to the myriad descriptions of why he's a poor choice to represent us. One would think, anyway.
But if I based my choices on "he's not like [me]..." based on a guy's personal wealth and religion, then that would disqualify every president we've ever had....for me. Every one of them has been much wealthier than me and certainly not one of them has matched up with me religiously. As much as I hate to say it, I can somewhat see banhammer's point there.
pathetic thread
pathetic thread
But if I based my choices on "he's not like [me]..." based on a guy's personal wealth and religion, then that would disqualify every president we've ever had....for me. Every one of them has been much wealthier than me and certainly not one of them has matched up with me religiously. As much as I hate to say it, I can somewhat see banhammer's point there.
No. Obama's net worth has only very recently become higher than yours. Mitt's has been 2000 to 4000 times as high as yours for a very long time, AND he is exponetially wealtier than any other candidate to date. Who cares about his religious convictions?
So, he's unqualified because of his religion and personal wealth? Noted.
His actions and subsequent dishonesty about his tenure at Bain Capital as it's sole stock holder, CEO and Chairman of the board alone disqualify him. Nothing to do with his ill gotten wealth. His sociopathic remarks and attitudes further exacerbate his lack of qualifications to lead an otherwise sane nation. Nothing to do with his cult of religion. The thousands of unanswered questions concerning his offshore banking habits and tax evasion practices also disqualify him. What more are you looking for?