Will Obama Rat on His Drug Dealers?

Will Obama Rat on His Drug Dealers?

Ya...I know, probably not, right? But for the sake of raising a point...

We have apparently stumbled upon the enlightenment, that pinheads now believe it is crucial and important to properly vet candidates for president. This includes digging into their pasts, and finding any kind of possible 'issue' of something that may be taken the wrong way. Because it's important we know the truth about our President. Since Obama does plan to be a candidate for president this year, I think there are some questions he needs to answer for us. (Seeing as how we're now all on the same page with regard to the vetting process.)

The first question is, who did he buy his illegal drugs from, when he was admittedly a drug user? It would be nice to know if this person was still pushing drugs on the streets, or if he cleaned up his act, at least. I think that would probably reflect on how responsible Obama is, and how much citizenship he has. These things are important when picking a president, you know?

We're going to also need to review Obama's academic records, which he still hasn't released. It's important for us to know how he gained his credentials, and see the documentation which supports it. If we can't take Romney's word for things like this, why would we accept Obama's? There is also a matter of the long-form birth certificate we've yet to see, but that can wait... I have even more important questions!

I want to see documentation surrounding Obama's association with Franklin Raines and William Ayres. And all the other Marxist-Socialists who have surrounded him his whole life. I think we need to look at his connections to Rev. Wright, and his radical theology. All of this stuff needs to be pulled out of the closet into the sunlight... now that Liberals understand the importance of properly vetting a president.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought I'd repost the OP, so everyone can grasp the threat topic again, it has become so polluted
with troll shit.

And as with your original op your entire premise is hateful, angry, paranoid, conspiracy theorist horseshit and that is very typical of you. Don't be sad if people treat it in the very manner in which you intended from the beginning.
 
Obama is under no obligation - nor should inbred rubes like you and the rest of the birther bigots insinuate that he is - to release his college transcripts just to appease the right wing kooks.

Comparing the knuckledragger's demands to the People's RIGHT to see Romney's tax returns underscores the level of stupidity on the right, as you continue to demonstrate with every post about it. Asking about Obama's drug dealers only punctuates your idiocy.

Where does this right exist? What gives you the right? Do I have the right to see your tax returns? Should every politician release their tax returns? If not, why not? Why just those runnung for President?

It is pretty narcissistic of you to think you have a right to it.

Also, you and your ilk sure felt differently about college transcripts when you were demanding Bush's college transcripts.

It is always the same thing with you libs party over principle. Did Alias say that once too? ;)
 
Here I have, been under the delusion that Liberals have finally seen the light, and now understand the importance of vetting a candidate for president... and I come to find out, as always, the Libtards have written themselves a pass on the rules. It's only REPUBLICAN candidates we can put through the ringer and investigate every aspect of their past, the DEMOCRAT candidate can't be discussed!

If you don't think this double-standard is fair, you're a racist kook.
If you try to discuss Obama's past, you are a racist bigot.
If you try to avoid discussing Romney's past, you're a racist redneck.
If you oppose Obama policies, it's obviously because you are a racist.
If you support Romney policies, it must be because you are a racist.
If you're undecided, you might have racist tendencies.
 
Obama is under no obligation - nor should inbred rubes like you and the rest of the birther bigots insinuate that he is - to release his college transcripts just to appease the right wing kooks.

Comparing the knuckledragger's demands to the People's RIGHT to see Romney's tax returns underscores the level of stupidity on the right, as you continue to demonstrate with every post about it. Asking about Obama's drug dealers only punctuates your idiocy.

where does this purported right derive from? i've seen no law or constitution that mentions this 'right'.
 
where does this purported right derive from? i've seen no law or constitution that mentions this 'right'.

He wants to be the leader of this country and economy; he is obligated to prove that his priorities are in the right place. Tax returns will tell the tale. Or not. He can choose not to disclose them - or he can disclose them and let everyone see what his priorities have been. And as a result, either way, he will LOSE the election. Simple as that.
 
He wants to be the leader of this country and economy; he is obligated to prove that his priorities are in the right place. Tax returns will tell the tale. Or not. He can choose not to disclose them - or he can disclose them and let everyone see what his priorities have been. And as a result, either way, he will LOSE the election. Simple as that.

i asked you about the "right".....not some political obligation. can you tell me where the right derives from? presidential candidates have not always released tax returns. so, again, where does the right you mentioned derive from?
 
i asked you about the "right".....not some political obligation. can you tell me where the right derives from? presidential candidates have not always released tax returns. so, again, where does the right you mentioned derive from?

Goody for you. If Romney wants to serve the People, he'll oblige them and release his tax returns. In them contains info by which his economic priorities will be judged. His word isn't enough. Call it whatever you want. We have a right to know who we're voting for.
 
Goody for you. If Romney wants to serve the People, he'll oblige them and release his tax returns. In them contains info by which his economic priorities will be judged. His word isn't enough. Call it whatever you want. We have a right to know who we're voting for.

why is it you're dodging my question? where does this right derive from? you do know the difference between a political obligation and a right....correct?

i really don't think you can judge someone's economic priorities on their tax returns. that is pure nonsense. how far do you go in obtaining personal information of a president? college grades? after all, "we have a right to know who we're voting for" and if they were a slacker, what would that say about their presidency? (note the sarcasm)
 
why is it you're dodging my question? where does this right derive from? you do know the difference between a political obligation and a right....correct?

I'm not dodging anything. The People have the right to know. You disagree, because it's not written down anywhere. Goody for you and your low standards on credibility. Romney has none. That's why his tax returns matter - because his words don't. He's already lied too many times.
i really don't think you can judge someone's economic priorities on their tax returns.

Good for you. I do.
 
I'm not dodging anything. The People have the right to know. You disagree, because it's not written down anywhere. Goody for you and your low standards on credibility. Romney has none. That's why his tax returns matter - because his words don't. He's already lied too many times.


Good for you. I do.

so then i can just make up any right i want? thanks for that information. real help bijou. i have a right to want all obama's school records. (note sarcasm).

tell me, how does one's tax returns help you judge their economic priorities?
 
Today, 12:52 PM
Bijou
Agitating the Unwashed
This message is hidden because Bijou is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list

----------------------

Black Archie Bunker, meet Meathead!
 
still nothing to back up your claim.

yawn.

how bijou debates:

lie about your opponent and when asked to back up your claims, laugh, insult and run away.
 
Back
Top