pastor has to marry a black couple at another church

i said i have never heard it, nor read it. it isn't an argument, it is a statement of fact. i merely asked for a cite showing where someone said it. you're delusional and on something today.



you're a prick. i answer your question - again - and you don't have the temerity to answer mine. and yet you just called me dishonest for allegedly not answering your question. you have run away from nearly all my questions in this thread. then you have the fucking nerve to claim i don't have the honesty to admit that racists do exist....which is the dumbest thing in the world, because if i didn't think racists exist....why would i believe racism still exists?

you are a two faced monumental prick. you didn't even play, you ran away from the tough questions. keep running, you'll just get tired.

:lol:

Do you think your bullshit hasn't been noticed?

I asked you simple questions ABOUT YOUR OWN WORDS .. IN BOLD and LARGE PRINT you ran away like a sissy. :0)
YOUR OWN WORDS and you ran.

I hate to break this to you, but this is your pattern. This is what you call debate.

First and foremost .. how in the fuck do you presume to know what everybody in the United States has said or not said? The fact that you never recognized how totally and completely ignorant that position is demonstrates why you resort to sissydom in debate.

It's an ignorant ass unfounded postion.

Tell you what .. no need for us to continue this folly .. and given your style of "debate" .. I'm not sure there is ever a reason for you and I to do what you call debate.
 
:lol:

Do you think your bullshit hasn't been noticed?

I asked you simple questions ABOUT YOUR OWN WORDS .. IN BOLD and LARGE PRINT you ran away like a sissy. :0)
YOUR OWN WORDS and you ran.

I hate to break this to you, but this is your pattern. This is what you call debate.

First and foremost .. how in the fuck do you presume to know what everybody in the United States has said or not said? The fact that you never recognized how totally and completely ignorant that position is demonstrates why you resort to sissydom in debate.

It's an ignorant ass unfounded postion.

Tell you what .. no need for us to continue this folly .. and given your style of "debate" .. I'm not sure there is ever a reason for you and I to do what you call debate.

so much for believing you to be an honorable person. you now have told 4 lies about me. i answered each and every one of your questions....here is my response, which you just quoted, to your question about my words:

i said i have never heard it, nor read it. it isn't an argument, it is a statement of fact.

you complain about my debate, yet, i am the one who has answered each and every question you posed. i have not lied about what you said, quite contrary to your several lies about me. you have run away from virtually every single question i've posed to you in this thread. you refuse to discuss your idiocy regarding zero is different than no racism. you refuse to discuss what the author MEANT by his words.

you are a dishonest fool BAC. it is unfortunate i ever believed otherwise.
 
so much for believing you to be an honorable person. you now have told 4 lies about me. i answered each and every one of your questions....here is my response, which you just quoted, to your question about my words:



you complain about my debate, yet, i am the one who has answered each and every question you posed. i have not lied about what you said, quite contrary to your several lies about me. you have run away from virtually every single question i've posed to you in this thread. you refuse to discuss your idiocy regarding zero is different than no racism. you refuse to discuss what the author MEANT by his words.

you are a dishonest fool BAC. it is unfortunate i ever believed otherwise.

For starters .. FUCK YOU.

Your argument is absolutely fucking ignorant.

I have statements from others who have said that racism is over/dead .. but there is no point in debating someone who is dumb enough to claim to know what everybody in the world has said.
 
how many times do i have to tell you

YES HE SAID THOSE WORDS - WHY THE FRACK DO YOU THINK I KEEP TALKING ABOUT HIS WORDS AND ASKING YOU WHAT HE MEANT

fuck dude. you're demented today. now....tell me....what exactly did he MEAN by those words?

btw....thanks for being an asshole and not apologizing for your lies.

i said i have never heard it, nor read it. it isn't an argument, it is a statement of fact. i merely asked for a cite showing where someone said it. you're delusional and on something today.



you're a prick. i answer your question - again - and you don't have the temerity to answer mine. and yet you just called me dishonest for allegedly not answering your question. you have run away from nearly all my questions in this thread. then you have the fucking nerve to claim i don't have the honesty to admit that racists do exist....which is the dumbest thing in the world, because if i didn't think racists exist....why would i believe racism still exists?

you are a two faced monumental prick. you didn't even play, you ran away from the tough questions. keep running, you'll just get tired.

so much for believing you to be an honorable person. you now have told 4 lies about me. i answered each and every one of your questions....here is my response, which you just quoted, to your question about my words:



you complain about my debate, yet, i am the one who has answered each and every question you posed. i have not lied about what you said, quite contrary to your several lies about me. you have run away from virtually every single question i've posed to you in this thread. you refuse to discuss your idiocy regarding zero is different than no racism. you refuse to discuss what the author MEANT by his words.

you are a dishonest fool BAC. it is unfortunate i ever believed otherwise.

Step back, folks....

It's about time for Burp's daily implosion!



 
hopefully people will be more open and honest about christianity than you and zappa. they will realize that this has nothing to with christianity and realize that it has all to do with this one racist idiot. you do realize another christian church married them? right? oooooops....funny how you ignore that aspect of the story.

Reading is fundamental. I specifically stated "the travesty this church makes of Christianity", not all churches since the beginning of time.

Furthermore, did you read: "There has never been a black wedding at the First Baptist Church in Crystal Springs, Miss., since its founding in 1883. According to Pastor Stan Weatherford, some church members objected so strongly to breaking that precedent, they threatened to oust him from his pastorship."

No black weddings for 129 years? You have to be a special sort of stupid to think there hasn't been generational racism in these members if they're proud of this record of discrimination.
 
Not at all. You are trying to force your secular beliefs on them. Which makes you te intolerant bigot. You don't see that of course since you reflexively support anything the gays wan you think that makes you open minded. It really only makes you a tool

Newsflash hotshot, I have a religious affiliation, not just secular beliefs. And you'd better believe if my priest refused to marry a black couple because of an outcry from some bigoted members, I'd be writing the bishop about it.
 
Reading is fundamental. I specifically stated "the travesty this church makes of Christianity", not all churches since the beginning of time.

Furthermore, did you read: "There has never been a black wedding at the First Baptist Church in Crystal Springs, Miss., since its founding in 1883. According to Pastor Stan Weatherford, some church members objected so strongly to breaking that precedent, they threatened to oust him from his pastorship."

No black weddings for 129 years? You have to be a special sort of stupid to think there hasn't been generational racism in these members if they're proud of this record of discrimination.

how does the word "this" change anything? it doesn't. if you actually could read, you would easily notice i recognized you referred to only that church by commenting on the fact they got married in another christian church.

so once again, christie gets it wrong and cries "you can't read"....when in fact, i did. my post stands.

hopefully people will be more open and honest about christianity than you and zappa. they will realize that this has nothing to with christianity and realize that it has all to do with this one racist idiot. you do realize another christian church married them? right? oooooops....funny how you ignore that aspect of the story.
 
For starters .. FUCK YOU.

Your argument is absolutely fucking ignorant.

I have statements from others who have said that racism is over/dead .. but there is no point in debating someone who is dumb enough to claim to know what everybody in the world has said.

and once again, despite making a huge deal and having a meltdown over me supposedly not answering your questions --> you STILL HAVE NOT answered my questions.

you're a hypocritical asshole. how in the world can you make a huge stink about someone else not answering questions, when you refuse to answer questions? how is it you have any ground to talk about my integrity when you have lied and not lived up to your own standards.

seriously, what is wrong with you? i've known you a long time and i've never seen you like this. ever.
 
and once again, despite making a huge deal and having a meltdown over me supposedly not answering your questions --> you STILL HAVE NOT answered my questions.

you're a hypocritical asshole. how in the world can you make a huge stink about someone else not answering questions, when you refuse to answer questions? how is it you have any ground to talk about my integrity when you have lied and not lived up to your own standards.

seriously, what is wrong with you? i've known you a long time and i've never seen you like this. ever.

Seriously I'm no longer slightly interested in debating you any further on this.

Your argument is mindless.

And, there is nothing wrong with me .. I simply have no tolerance for dishonest debate.

Your argument is mindless.
 
Seriously I'm no longer slightly interested in debating you any further on this.

Your argument is mindless.

And, there is nothing wrong with me .. I simply have no tolerance for dishonest debate.

Your argument is mindless.

once again BAC runs away....

you're pathetic. i have not lied once. whereas you have lied four times. you still won't answer any of my questions, but whine that i don't answer yours.

that you don't see how insane you are is hilarious. since you say there is nothing wrong with you, i sorely misjudged you. are you a certifiable liar and nut case.
 
once again BAC runs away....

you're pathetic. i have not lied once. whereas you have lied four times. you still won't answer any of my questions, but whine that i don't answer yours.

that you don't see how insane you are is hilarious. since you say there is nothing wrong with you, i sorely misjudged you. are you a certifiable liar and nut case.

Lying is a pattern with you dude .. which I'm sure comes as no surprise.

Your argument is mindless.
 
Really? So the redneck asshole who called my wife a "slope" and the aging rock star who told her "Don't interupt white peoples conversations." and the moron soft racist who told her "You're such a credit to your race" were just figments of her (and mine) imagination? You're in lala land Yurt.

did i say racism doesn't exist doople?
 
Lying is a pattern with you dude .. which I'm sure comes as no surprise.

Your argument is mindless.

what did i lie about? let me guess...you won't answer that question either. LOL

btw....for the umpteenth time...it is not an argument. i merely stated i have not heard anyone say it. that you can't grasp the difference proves you're incapable of engaging in meaningful discussion.
 
I love the way that liberals can take a thread where everyone is in agreement, then fuck it up to make everyone hate each other again.....
 
Newsflash hotshot, I have a religious affiliation, not just secular beliefs. And you'd better believe if my priest refused to marry a black couple because of an outcry from some bigoted members, I'd be writing the bishop about it.

Fine. I think you are missing the boat. I am not saying what he did was right or wrong, just that he should have the right to do it
 
how does the word "this" change anything? it doesn't. if you actually could read, you would easily notice i recognized you referred to only that church by commenting on the fact they got married in another christian church.

so once again, christie gets it wrong and cries "you can't read"....when in fact, i did. my post stands.

hopefully people will be more open and honest about christianity than you and zappa. they will realize that this has nothing to with christianity and realize that it has all to do with this one racist idiot. you do realize another christian church married them? right? oooooops....funny how you ignore that aspect of the story.

I didn't ignore the fact that the couple was married in another church. It simply wasn't relevant, because the point of the article was discrimination, not location.

1. Church never married a black couple in the 129 years of its existence. WWJD?
2. Pastor caved in to bigoted parishioners' demands that he not marry the Wilsons either. WWJD?
3. Pastor married the Wilsons in a church where the parishioners DID WHAT JESUS WOULD DO.

Frankly yurt, your comments are baffling. It's not just one racist idiot, it's all the members on the congregation who browbeat the pastor into changing the venue. If you can't see the obvious, i.e. parishioners' bigotry and pastor's cowardice, all the explanations in the world won't persuade you.
 
I didn't ignore the fact that the couple was married in another church. It simply wasn't relevant, because the point of the article was discrimination, not location.

1. Church never married a black couple in the 129 years of its existence. WWJD?
2. Pastor caved in to bigoted parishioners' demands that he not marry the Wilsons either. WWJD?
3. Pastor married the Wilsons in a church where the parishioners DID WHAT JESUS WOULD DO.

Frankly yurt, your comments are baffling. It's not just one racist idiot, it's all the members on the congregation who browbeat the pastor into changing the venue. If you can't see the obvious, i.e. parishioners' bigotry and pastor's cowardice, all the explanations in the world won't persuade you.

my comments were about your comment about this one church and how this one church mars all of christianity. you're now moving the goal posts because you realize you were wrong about your claim i didn't read your post and you realize how silly you sound by claiming this one church mars all of christianity.

the people are racist jerks. that said, it is nonsensical to claim this one church puts a stain on all of christianity. that is like saying one liberal represents all liberals. that was my point. lastly, i already said the chruch is racist idiot in prior posts. so i am puzzled as to how you wonder that i can't see their racism. apparently it is you who can't read christie.
 
my comments were about your comment about this one church and how this one church mars all of christianity. you're now moving the goal posts because you realize you were wrong about your claim i didn't read your post and you realize how silly you sound by claiming this one church mars all of christianity.

the people are racist jerks. that said, it is nonsensical to claim this one church puts a stain on all of christianity. that is like saying one liberal represents all liberals. that was my point. lastly, i already said the chruch is racist idiot in prior posts. so i am puzzled as to how you wonder that i can't see their racism. apparently it is you who can't read christie.

I didn't say the church "puts a stain on all of Christianity" because we were only talking about these particular members and their un-Christian behaviour.

You're hopeless. I'm done with this.
 
Do you not understand the travesty this church makes of Christianity?

I didn't say the church "puts a stain on all of Christianity" because we were only talking about these particular members and their un-Christian behaviour.

You're hopeless. I'm done with this.

you didn't? so when you said "of christianity"....you only meant some of christianity? that does not make sense, but please do explain how you didn't say it and what you meant. the way i read "of christianity" - is not some, but of it all.
 
Back
Top