But global warming isn't happening?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
\\\()/// said:
Is it?
Click to expand...

Yes, it is. The alarmists like hansen have been shown to manipulate data and use faulty methods to make their specious conclusions.
You alarmist followers don't even know the most basic elements of the science let alone the points of contention
 
tinfoil said:
Yes, it is. The alarmists like hansen have been shown to manipulate data and use faulty methods to make their specious conclusions. You alarmist followers don't even know the most basic elements of the science let alone the points of contention
Click to expand...

So July wasn't the hottest month in the lower 48 states since the government began keeping temperature records in 1895?
 
\\\\()//// said:
So July wasn't the hottest month in the lower 48 states since the government began keeping temperature records in 1895?
Click to expand...

jesus christ, you're a total idiot.
No, dumbfuck, I didn't say july wasn't record setting.
I didn't say there is no global warming.

Just because the planet warmed doesn't mean humans caused it.
Natural climate cycles: how do they work?
 
tinfoil said:
jesus christ, you're a total idiot. No, dumbfuck, I didn't say july wasn't record setting.
I didn't say there is no global warming. Just because the planet warmed doesn't mean humans caused it.
Natural climate cycles: how do they work?
Click to expand...

So July was the hottest month in the lower 48 states since the government began keeping temperature records in 1895?
 
tinfoil said:
Yes, it is. The alarmists like hansen have been shown to manipulate data and use faulty methods to make their specious conclusions.
You alarmist followers don't even know the most basic elements of the science let alone the points of contention
Click to expand...

The basic elements are of no concern. By arguing the minutae you are accepting the premise. The premise may be true or it may be false. You are not in a position to know but you are in a position to express an opinion. Express it and have done with it.
 
The argument about climate change isn't whether it happens, it is whether or not it is driven by human activity.
 
tinfoil said:
Yes, it is. The alarmists like hansen have been shown to manipulate data and use faulty methods to make their specious conclusions.
You alarmist followers don't even know the most basic elements of the science let alone the points of contention
Click to expand...

They don't know the basic elements of SCIENCE... ANY KIND! They simply believe in whatever science says at the moment, and that's proven fact and can't be refuted or challenged. That's how they view science. If we were smart, we'd pay some group of scientists to say that on a certain day and time, science says that gravity will be greatly suspended, and you will be able to fly if you jump off a cliff at precisely this time... I BET there would be pinheads jumping, because SCIENCE SAID!
 
Damocles said:
The argument about climate change isn't whether it happens, it is whether or not it is driven by human activity.
Click to expand...

And if we agree that it is or that it isn't what difference would it make? We do know that human activity is causing pollution. We do know that human activity consumes the planet's finite resources. We do know that human activity (not solely) has destroyed countless species of flora and fauna.
That is enough for us to STOP what we are doing at least until we find a solution. Whether human activity is changing the patterns of climate will be of no concern when the world is denuded of its forests, runs out of its raw materials and has nothing left but what we have manufactured.
 
Lowaicue said:
And if we agree that it is or that it isn't what difference would it make? We do know that human activity is causing pollution. We do know that human activity consumes the planet's finite resources. We do know that human activity (not solely) has destroyed countless species of flora and fauna.
That is enough for us to STOP what we are doing at least until we find a solution. Whether human activity is changing the patterns of climate will be of no concern when the world is denuded of its forests, runs out of its raw materials and has nothing left but what we have manufactured.
Click to expand...

Here's the problem, we can't do much about the population on the planet, unless you are suggesting some sort of mass genocide. That said, we are going to consume resources, it can't be helped. Almost any production is going to contribute to pollution in some way, it can't be helped. Do we need to be conscientious about it? OF COURSE! No one has ever said that we shouldn't be. But we simply can't roll back humanity to a point it has no impact on resources or environment, unless you want to return to living in caves and such.
 
Lowaicue said:
And if we agree that it is or that it isn't what difference would it make? We do know that human activity is causing pollution. We do know that human activity consumes the planet's finite resources. We do know that human activity (not solely) has destroyed countless species of flora and fauna.
That is enough for us to STOP what we are doing at least until we find a solution. Whether human activity is changing the patterns of climate will be of no concern when the world is denuded of its forests, runs out of its raw materials and has nothing left but what we have manufactured.
Click to expand...

Hence my argument...

We should be responsible regardless, and without unnecessary hysteria. Making up stuff doesn't make it a better reason and only causes some people to react negatively to some good ideas. People, as a group, don't like to feel like they are being manipulated by what seems to be scare tactics.
 
Dixie said:
Here's the problem, we can't do much about the population on the planet, unless you are suggesting some sort of mass genocide. That said, we are going to consume resources, it can't be helped. Almost any production is going to contribute to pollution in some way, it can't be helped. Do we need to be conscientious about it? OF COURSE! No one has ever said that we shouldn't be. But we simply can't roll back humanity to a point it has no impact on resources or environment, unless you want to return to living in caves and such.
Click to expand...

Then accept what's coming, rube. It won't be pretty.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top