Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Yes, I love her so much I put her on ignore.
i'm sorry.
Yes, I love her so much I put her on ignore.
Too funny for words!
translation:
yurt is right again. so i will simply mock his post instead of addressing it.
is this the "rational debate" zappa is talking about? if so, no wonder he sticks to whining and insulting.
tff
you asked about potential....apparently you don't even have the intelligence to understand what it is you asked for. there are actual examples, but i'm going to educate you on what you asked for:
Definition of POTENTIAL
: existing in possibility : capable of development into actuality
http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/potential
you're welcome.
i "keep promising civil debate" zappa?
cite. i like how you cowardly ran away from my question. typical hypocrite.
i've tried several times to get you to have a rational debate and each time you run away..
People in this thread were having a nice, civil discussion unt5il YOU decided to hijack the thread and take us all the Snark Town with comments like:
Stop whining because some of us decided to have some fun after you derailed the discussion.
nice try whiner......you made this thread about me in your title dumbfuck. this is nothing but a flame thread.
i've tried to get you to discuss christian hate, but you won't. all you do is keep making the thread solely about me.
you're a hateful asshole
the quote you cited says nothing about "promising civil debate" zappa. trying to get you to do something, is quite different than me promising to do something.
i don't know if you're just a born liar or a born idiot.
Nice job parsing words once again.
It's okay...I didn't expect any honesty out of you this time either.
awesome bijou burn.you asked for a potential....now that you've been shown that there exists a potential, you of course have to move the goal posts. why is that? why is it you can't accept an answer to your question? why is it that you have to constantly move the goal posts in an attempt to get the answer you really want instead of a truthful answer?
is it because you're democrat hack who will never change her POV because you're a hack?
yes, some of us were. unfortunately it wasn't YOU, zappa, with your idiot references and remarks about wild west wyatt earps and your penis envy crap.People in this thread were having a nice, civil discussion unt5il YOU decided to hijack the thread and take us all the Snark Town with comments like:
Stop whining because some of us decided to have some fun after you derailed the discussion.
yes, some of us were. unfortunately it wasn't YOU, zappa, with your idiot references and remarks about wild west wyatt earps and your penis envy crap.
James Sorensen, a 24-year-old Army veteran who has fought in Iraq and Afghanistan, was leaving a PrideFest at Acacia Park on July 21 with his partner when he was detained and arrested. Sorensen's partner caught the police encounter on tape and uploaded it to YouTube.
In the video, Sorensen can be seen telling police officers "this is against the law. This is against my amendment rights. My Second Amendment rights, sergeant."
"This is because I'm gay, isn't it?" Sorensen asks. "I'm gay and I'm carrying a weapon."
Sorensen goes on to say that he won't get into the back of the police car before officers take away 40-caliber handgun, handcuff him and place him in the vehicle. In the video Sorensen can be heard shouting, "I am being disarmed. For no reason at all. Now I'm being arrested for no reason at all."
And as it turns out, he was right.
Police later say that they made a mistake because they relied on a legal cheat sheet that was outdated by a decade. Civilians can carry a weapon in public parks.
“I share some concerns about what happened,” Colorado Springs Police Chief Pete Carey told the Gazette. “I have a responsibility to make sure my guys are trained and they have the right resources, that they’re taking the right action.”
colorado police arrest pridefest participant for open carry
so now the residents of colorado springs will be on the hook for whatever settlement or damages award this guy receives because cops violate this mans rights and the law, but the cops will suffer no injury whatsoever.
unfortunately this true. btw...if their defense is that they relied on an out dated "cheat sheet"....they should lose as that is not the standard.
let me ask you this:
what should the individual police suffer for making a mistake, that likely their precinct made?