Will Reid back up his claim?

thanks, i wasn't sure as you directly responded to me. i think romney should release more returns as well. however, to focus on this as much as obama and dems are is nothing short of birtherism....call it taxerism....

Frankly can you blame them for wanting revenge?
 
ZappasGuitar;1058997]Right here...





Above is you taking Romney's side...


And below is you taking Reid's side...

no, i'm actually taking my side. i stated, before reid ever made his claim, that romney should release more tax returns. remember, you called me a liar that i didn't and you had egg on your face when i showed you the post? so, it is illogical to say i'm taking reid's side, given, i took that stance before reid's claim.

saying the onus is on reid is not really taking sides. it is, however, pointing out the rules of proof. even nigel said the onus is on both of them, yet, you are kicking and screaming that nigel is taking both sides. you're just full of hate for me. you're obsessed and



Taking both sides in an argument depending on who you were arguing with...nothing screams "two-faced" like taking both sides of an argument.

See how I supplied you with your actual quotes to back up my assertions?

It's what's known as a "plain answer"...something you are still too cowardly to supply.

Ya think you might one day post the ACTUAL POST where you claim I said your promise involved "all posts"


see above....i didn't take both sides. you're just pissy because you got caught in yet another lie this morning.
 
no, i'm actually taking my side. i stated, before reid ever made his claim, that romney should release more tax returns. remember, you called me a liar that i didn't and you had egg on your face when i showed you the post? so, it is illogical to say i'm taking reid's side, given, i took that stance before reid's claim.

saying the onus is on reid is not really taking sides. it is, however, pointing out the rules of proof. even nigel said the onus is on both of them, yet, you are kicking and screaming that nigel is taking both sides. you're just full of hate for me. you're obsessed and






see above....i didn't take both sides. you're just pissy because you got caught in yet another lie this morning.



Boy that was a surprise...

Yurt pretends to find a way to twist his OWN words so he doesn't have to admit he got busted taking both sides in a discussion.


You sided with Reid...AND you sided with Romeny...in the same thread.

Yurt has become the very definition of two-faced.

Yurt's hatred for me is so strong it overpowers his common sense and allows him to confabulate these crazy explanations for why he's such a two-faced liar.
 
let's see....before reid says romney should release his taxes....i say the same thing. reid comes along later, and says the same thing i said earlier....and that means i'm taking reid's side.

that's funny. it is actually rather insane. but still funny. what is even more funny is that hateful zappa isn't crying about nigel (liberal) saying the onus is also on reid and that romney should release more tax returns.
 
let's see....before reid says romney should release his taxes....i say the same thing. reid comes along later, and says the same thing i said earlier....and that means i'm taking reid's side.

that's funny. it is actually rather insane. but still funny. what is even more funny is that hateful zappa isn't crying about nigel (liberal) saying the onus is also on reid and that romney should release more tax returns.


So you admit you and Reid are of the same opinion, but that doesn't mean you are taking Reid's side...

Oh, and we weren't discussing Nigel's opinion of the matter...we were discussing you siding with Romney while discussing the issue with one person and you siding with Reid while discussing the topic with another.

But your pitiful attempt to divert attention away from your two-faced stupidity is still pretty entertaining.
 
appasGuitar;1059410]So you admit you and Reid are of the same opinion, but that doesn't mean you are taking Reid's side...

correct. i'm not surprised you won't admit the fact that i held that opinion BEFORE reid's statement. tell me something - if i happen to agree with you on a specific point, does that mean i'm taking your side?

Oh, and we weren't discussing Nigel's opinion of the matter...we were discussing you siding with Romney while discussing the issue with one person and you siding with Reid while discussing the topic with another.


translation - i'm a hack who only whines about righties or those who lean right and give a pass to all lefties and those who lean left. you just admitted you're a two faced hack. i'm proud of you.

But your pitiful attempt to divert attention away from your two-faced stupidity is still pretty entertaining

how is answering your questions, responding directly to your claims....diverting attention away?
 
correct. i'm not surprised you won't admit the fact that i held that opinion BEFORE reid's statement. tell me something - if i happen to agree with you on a specific point, does that mean i'm taking your side?


Yes...yes it does.


translation - i'm a hack who only whines about righties or those who lean right and give a pass to all lefties and those who lean left. you just admitted you're a two faced hack. i'm proud of you.


Once again Yurt shows he doesn't have the IQ necessary to deal with what I ACTUALLY wrote, so he "translates" what I actually wrote so he can engage in more ad hom attacks.


how is answering your questions, responding directly to your claims....diverting attention away?


But you didn't...you still refuse to simply post the ACTUAL NUMBER of the supposed comment you claim I made about you promising civil debate in "all posts"...why can't you answer that one,simple question?.


It's just another standard issue Yurt diversion.
 
Back
Top