More bad news for Obama

So you think a career politician that has done nothing else but live off the government, while being the laughing stock of the liberal left ever since I can remember is a good thing? Great, stick with that.

So you want a kid with no foreign policy knowledge or experience as President of the Senate, deputy Commander in Cheif of the largest military force ever assembled, next in line for the most powerful position on earth?

Yeah, I will stick with the guy with 40 plus years of experience for those roles, thank you very much, and also, thanks again for proving what a witless fool you are.

By the way, Ryan has actually sucked government teat longer than Biden, even though he is younger, moron, so you may want to look for a better disqualifier in the future.
 
So you want a kid with no foreign policy knowledge or experience as President of the Senate, deputy Commander in Cheif of the largest military force ever assembled, next in line for the most powerful position on earth?

Yeah, I will stick with the guy with 40 plus years of experience for those roles, thank you very much, and also, thanks again for proving what a witless fool you are.

lmao.....you voted for obama and he didn't have any of those qualifications hacktard.
 
So, an hour and a half and a thread with real substance to it on the issue of this election, and crickets....Unbelievable....And this is a political debate site, or just an anger outlet site?

sorry, I stopped reading after..

".... Between now and the election, polls are likely to be less stable than Joe Biden's thought process..."


after that I figured it was an opinion piece and I don't have an extreme right opinion and didn't really want to read about one..
 
More good news for Obama ..

Electoral Map Does Not Favor Romney

Republican candidate Mitt Romney may have to be extra careful with his electoral votes this fall, with some counts giving him a bare 20 votes over the 270 he’d need to win the presidency. That means that while there is a road to the White House for Romney, it’s not one that will allow for many mistakes. Republicans have had trouble winning a significant electoral ceiling in the past two decades, while Democrats have often swept up far more votes than needed—and Romney will need to take states such as Pennsylvania and Michigan, which have gone blue for the past five contests.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2012/04/30/electoral-map-does-not-favor-romney.html

With the selection of Ryan, Obama 's campaign is looking even better with states like Florida now in play.

In fact, you right-wingers have re-vitalized democratic chances of winning the House and the Senate.

that's ok.. I'm sure they'll come up with some other kind of 'voting' law and fix that.. ;)
 
So you think a career politician that has done nothing else but live off the government, while being the laughing stock of the liberal left ever since I can remember is a good thing? Great, stick with that.

The Prez is so far above your head that you'll never get it, jaybird. Laughing stock of the liberal left? In your freaking dreams, liar. Millions of Republicans voted for him as a state Senator, a US Senator and as President of the USA. Millions of white people, particularly white women, have voted for him repeatedly and will gladly do so again in November of this year. The old white men of the Republican Party along with their idiotic governance philosophies are slowly but steadily dying out. Some of the sure enough crackers just aren't keeping up with the times. It's a new age, jaybird. Clock in or clock out is my advise to you but I already know you'll not be taking much advise from anyone sensical in that regard. You never do.
 
So, I guess my question is how can the president create jobs? I have looked at the Constitution and can't find his job creating power. keep in mind, I'm not voting for the guy, I just want to know what direct power in inherent in the presidency to create jobs.
 
So, I guess my question is how can the president create jobs? I have looked at the Constitution and can't find his job creating power. keep in mind, I'm not voting for the guy, I just want to know what direct power in inherent in the presidency to create jobs.

spend money that congress gives him.
 
lmao.....you voted for obama and he didn't have any of those qualifications hacktard.

Wrong again, as usual, shit fer brains, I voted for Hillary as I have said here many times.

Think of it though Yurt; Romney with no foriegn policy experience, (he thinks we should invade Iran) and Ryan, with even less.
The blind leading the blind. Even you, shill hack extrordinaire that you are, must know in your heart that this is not a good thing.
 
Wrong again, as usual, shit fer brains, I voted for Hillary as I have said here many times.

Think of it though Yurt; Romney with no foriegn policy experience, (he thinks we should invade Iran) and Ryan, with even less.
The blind leading the blind. Even you, shill hack extrordinaire that you are, must know in your heart that this is not a good thing.

so you actually wrote hillary's name on your ballot? if so, i applaud you.

as to the rest, she never was in the military, she was never president of the senate or deputy Commander in Cheif of the largest military force ever assembled. yet....you claim you voted for her.
 
so you actually wrote hillary's name on your ballot? if so, i applaud you.

as to the rest, she never was in the military, she was never president of the senate or deputy Commander in Cheif of the largest military force ever assembled. yet....you claim you voted for her.

Yes, but Bill was. You know, her husband, the presumptive First Gentleman, the guy with 8 good years in those positions?
The Clintons have always been political partners, there is no reason to think he would not be her closest advisor.
 
So, I guess my question is how can the president create jobs? I have looked at the Constitution and can't find his job creating power. keep in mind, I'm not voting for the guy, I just want to know what direct power in inherent in the presidency to create jobs.

In your first sentence you speak of the at large presidency and duties described in the Constitution. In the second sentence you say "I'm not voting for the guy." In the third you return to your original premise that the Constitution gives the Prez no power to create jobs. Not to be nitpicky but the Constitution gives the Prez enormous power and responsibility to preserve the well-being of this nation and it does so in several instances.
 
sorry, I stopped reading after..

".... Between now and the election, polls are likely to be less stable than Joe Biden's thought process..."


after that I figured it was an opinion piece and I don't have an extreme right opinion and didn't really want to read about one..


Hmmmm....Haven't you linked to the DailyKOS in here? yeah....go away.
 
So, I guess my question is how can the president create jobs? I have looked at the Constitution and can't find his job creating power. keep in mind, I'm not voting for the guy, I just want to know what direct power in inherent in the presidency to create jobs.

Does the President sign bills into law that have an effect on job creation? K, thanks for playin.
 
The Prez is so far above your head that you'll never get it, jaybird. Laughing stock of the liberal left? In your freaking dreams, liar. Millions of Republicans voted for him as a state Senator, a US Senator and as President of the USA. Millions of white people, particularly white women, have voted for him repeatedly and will gladly do so again in November of this year. The old white men of the Republican Party along with their idiotic governance philosophies are slowly but steadily dying out. Some of the sure enough crackers just aren't keeping up with the times. It's a new age, jaybird. Clock in or clock out is my advise to you but I already know you'll not be taking much advise from anyone sensical in that regard. You never do.


:rofl2: I especially like the 'sure enough crackers' jab....nice job you racist hack...:rofl2: Laughing stock is exactly what that dumb ass is...He has always been a gaff machine, and it was even better in the late 90's when he thought that dressing like a barber shop quartet member was stylish....heh....But Yeah, what a ladies man..BwWHAAAAAA
 
No, Romney loses hands down. That was decided the minute he anounced Ryan was his VP.
Why is this so hard for you to understand? The hard right was going to vote for Romney anyway (they couldn't vote for Obama, since he is black).

What Romney needed was a moderate, someone moderate republicans, conservative democrats and independents could support. Instead he picked Public Enemy #1, the second most hated politician in the world (only Bohner is more disliked by the center-left than Ryan.

Now many people who might have gone with Mitt have NO choice whatsoever, but to vote Obama.

Mitt picking Ryan was one of the biggest political blunders in all of recorded history, actually even dumber than McCain picking Sarin. No need to glue yourself to the TV, Mitt doesn't stand a chance.

Note, this post is entirely serious, with neither sarcasm nor critizism, just the facts Jack.

Let's see if you can respond in kind.

A moderate needed a moderate to give him moderate credibility?

Paul Ryan brought the campaign back into policy issues from the small stuff that Obama was trying desperately to use to distract from his dismal policy record. As long as the argument is on policy, the republicans will win. You can really tell this when you hear Obama desperately attempting to bring back up 1983 and Romney's dog. If you can't run on your record you make the election about small stuff...
 
Romney doesn't have ANY votes yet. Did you read the rest of the article that says he would have to make no mistakes to even get there?

Romney .. no mistakes?

Obama's been making mistakes for four years and everyone knows it.....you really think he's going to get another chance?.....
 
A moderate needed a moderate to give him moderate credibility?

Paul Ryan brought the campaign back into policy issues from the small stuff that Obama was trying desperately to use to distract from his dismal policy record. As long as the argument is on policy, the republicans will win. You can really tell this when you hear Obama desperately attempting to bring back up 1983 and Romney's dog. If you can't run on your record you make the election about small stuff...

Since when is Ryan a moderate?*

Let's see who gets this right.
 
You can be sure of whatever you want .. especially since the republican Congress is so loved by the American people. :0)

Congress' Job Approval Rating Worst in Gallup History
http://www.gallup.com/poll/145238/congress-job-approval-rating-worst-gallup-history.aspx

13%

That was in 2010 .. could it go even lower?

Approval of Congress Again Hits Record Low of 10 Percent
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-08-14/approval-of-congress-again-hits-record-low-of-10-percent

Oh sure :rofl2:

perhaps you should take a look at the polling data for the states that are close......the only question is how many seats the Republicans will pick up.....

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/senate/2012_elections_senate_map.html
 
Back
Top