Limbaugh Blames NYC Shooting On Obama

SmarterthanYou said:
there is a difference between state and federal. While a state may restore a right to a firearm, the last case I remember had scotus citing the supremacy clause in denying firearms rights to convicted felons, even though the state restored them.
Click to expand...

Any chance that maybe it had been a federal crime, that was committed?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Any chance that maybe it had been a federal crime, that was committed?
Click to expand...
not really, no. the USC that prohibits possession of firearms by felons is based solely on the crime and time. So if a person commits a state felony, but it isn't a federal law violation, that person would still be prohibited from firearm possession unless that right was restored by the ATF/congress.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Tell you what. Since you have all the answers and feel that you are better then the Police, why don't you run for Police Chief, clean up all the "cooruption" in your area; then you can run for Sheriff and clean up your county. Because you sure do a lot of bitching and moaning, without putting anything out there.
Click to expand...

Here's why:

SmarterthanYou said:
...All I need to say is 'fuck you'. I'm decently capable of handling myself in a physical altercation, if necessary, but I have a wife with a very serious heart condition. If something happens to me, she is screwed in all ways imaginable. So say whatever childish bullshit you want to, but i'm going home at the end of the day, with the full capability of being able to take care of the wife. THAT makes me a man...
Click to expand...
 
SmarterthanYou said:
by your own admission, you're here to mock people you make posts intimating certain statements, then ask 'did I say that' when called on it. you delete posts in threads that don't provide you mocking material and that's just a few.
Click to expand...

Weak.

You're not proving your case.

Try again, or confess that you have no reason to label me a troll, except to curry favor with the board cowards.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
not really, no. the USC that prohibits possession of firearms by felons is based solely on the crime and time. So if a person commits a state felony, but it isn't a federal law violation, that person would still be prohibited from firearm possession unless that right was restored by the ATF/congress.
Click to expand...


Not according to the info on the site that I posted.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Not according to the info on the site that I posted.
Click to expand...
http://www.rip.uscourts.gov/rip/supervision/firearmpossession/FirearmPossessionProhibition.pdf

Federal law (18 U.S.C. § 922[g][1-9]) prohibits certain individuals from possessing firearms,
ammunition, or explosives. The penalty for violating this law is ten years imprisonment and/or a
$250,000 fine. Further, 18 U.S.C. 3565(b)(2) (probation) and 3583(g)(2) (supervised release)
makes it mandatory for the Court to revoke supervision for possession of a firearm.
Specifically, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1-9) prohibits the following from possessing, shipping/
transporting, or receiving any firearm or ammunition:
(1) a person convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment exceeding one year;
(2) a person who is a fugitive from justice;
(3) a person who is an unlawful user of or who is addicted to a controlled substance;
(4) a person who has been adjudicated as a mental defective or who has been admitted
to a mental institution;
(5) an alien who is unlawfully in the United States or who has been admitted to the
United States under a nonimmigrant visa;
(6) a person who has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable
conditions;
(7) a person who, having been a citizen of the United States, renounces his citizenship;
(8) a person subject to a court order that was issued after a hearing in which the person
participated, which order restrains the person from harassing, stalking, or threatening
an intimate partner or partner’s child, and which order includes a finding that the
person is a credible threat to such partner or partner’s child, or by its terms prohibits
the use, attempted use or threatened use of such force against such partner or
partner’s child;
(9) a person who has been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.
 
enough said:
here is why rush said what he said....



it is the same ol' tit for tat politics that both sides play. he clearly is using hyperbole to make a point about the libs. the libs blame X shooting on the right, so rush blames X shooting on obama, the leader of the left.

i would care if the left didn't have dirty hands as well and if the left actually admitted they do it.
Click to expand...

but the left has facts on its side whereas fatbaugh just has his big mouth
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top