Ryan: Don't interfere with legalized medical pot

Which still leaves me with the question then, of WHY the shift? More imporatantly why the INTENSE use of random RICO threats sent out by the USDA's - there are probably close to a thousand by now, if i must repeat myself, they are on a fishing expedition.

I believe that, because under the Bush administration, as 'socially conservative' as they were, still maintained a federalist philosophy on medical marijuana and didn't become as proactive as one might expect. This gave the laws ability to be passed and implemented, dispensaries established, etc., while the Bush DoJ and admin, chased foreign terrorists and drug cartels. I think Obama is the problem, plain and simple, it is HIS Attorney General, HIS Justice Department, and HIS DEA!

Now you want to know why? Well it's because Democrats want you to believe in HOPE and CHANGE! They can't have you believing in that if they make all this stuff come true, can they? How is Hillary Clinton supposed to get up there in 2016 and proclaim it's time we bring America into the 21st century and end the senseless prosecution of MM users, if that is all taken care of now? You see, they need the issue more than they need to solve the issue itself. It's not about getting legalized pot with them, they don't want that issue to be settled, but what they've discovered is, as long as you are stupid enough to vote for them, they can keep enforcing federal laws against it, and you will keep voting for more and more of them! The issue becomes bigger and bigger, and you just keep believing their speeches about HOPE and CHANGE... and we'll get there one day! We'll have all this great liberal freedom! They talk a great talk, but their actions are completely contrary to what they 'INFER' they support. They can't even put this in their national platform, because they would lose half their representatives in the house, and probably half the senate too. It would be a bloodbath.

National legalization of pot... AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN! There are too many people around the country completely opposed to the idea, and it's not going to ever fly on a national level with that much opposition. Again, there IS the possibility that a Federalist viewpoint could open the door to states adopting their own MM laws, and the Feds taking the Constitutional approach that it's not their business. In that scenario, you would see a constantly growing number of states adopting pro-pot laws, and eventually, the Supreme Court would determine that this is such a widespread concept that it becomes law of the land for all. That's how it could happen, if we can convince the idiots who support Statist Liberal Socialism, to stop being stupid about it.
 
I believe that, because under the Bush administration, as 'socially conservative' as they were, still maintained a federalist philosophy on medical marijuana and didn't become as proactive as one might expect. This gave the laws ability to be passed and implemented, dispensaries established, etc., while the Bush DoJ and admin, chased foreign terrorists and drug cartels. I think Obama is the problem, plain and simple, it is HIS Attorney General, HIS Justice Department, and HIS DEA!

Now you want to know why? Well it's because Democrats want you to believe in HOPE and CHANGE! They can't have you believing in that if they make all this stuff come true, can they? How is Hillary Clinton supposed to get up there in 2016 and proclaim it's time we bring America into the 21st century and end the senseless prosecution of MM users, if that is all taken care of now? You see, they need the issue more than they need to solve the issue itself. It's not about getting legalized pot with them, they don't want that issue to be settled, but what they've discovered is, as long as you are stupid enough to vote for them, they can keep enforcing federal laws against it, and you will keep voting for more and more of them! The issue becomes bigger and bigger, and you just keep believing their speeches about HOPE and CHANGE... and we'll get there one day! We'll have all this great liberal freedom! They talk a great talk, but their actions are completely contrary to what they 'INFER' they support. They can't even put this in their national platform, because they would lose half their representatives in the house, and probably half the senate too. It would be a bloodbath.

National legalization of pot... AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN! There are too many people around the country completely opposed to the idea, and it's not going to ever fly on a national level with that much opposition. Again, there IS the possibility that a Federalist viewpoint could open the door to states adopting their own MM laws, and the Feds taking the Constitutional approach that it's not their business. In that scenario, you would see a constantly growing number of states adopting pro-pot laws, and eventually, the Supreme Court would determine that this is such a widespread concept that it becomes law of the land for all. That's how it could happen, if we can convince the idiots who support Statist Liberal Socialism, to stop being stupid about it.

Wrong again.

The majority of Americans SUPPORT legalized marijuana.

Majority of Americans support marijuana legalization
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/183541/majority-of-americans-support-marijuana-legalization/

Most Americans Want Marijuana Legalized and Regulated
The latest public opinion poll shows that a growing majority of American voters support the legalization and regulation of marijuana.

http://www.alternet.org/story/155564/most_americans_want_marijuana_legalized_and_regulated

Where in the hell do you get such bad information?
 
you bring up a good point:
sure the DEA follows DoJ policy, but since MM is a Schedule 1 drug, the DEA doesn't recognize "smoked marijuana as a medicine"
(direct quote).
The question becomes to what degree the DEA pushes on DoJ/Obama -i assume a LOT of pressure, they are a huge powerful agency, with worldwide. Offices.
http://www.justthinktwice.com/content/inside_dea.html

You can see what happens, the DEA Adm is a hardnosed anti - marijuana woman, the whole agency is like Hoover's FBI on steroids.

So. They can use the clout - maybe mention "hey if you want us to use our powers to stop narco-traffcing of marjijuana, into the US. -
you (Obama/Holder) have to let us enforce internal laws."

Now that's pure speculation on my part, but you know how bureaucratic maze work inside gov't. you want co-operation? fund me, or give me this or that,
and i'll prioritize your request.
What I'm trying to say the institutional bureaurcrats outlive any Adm. They want the budgets, and turf, they can help or hinder an Adm's goals.

IMHO -this is what is happening -no proof -just my opinion, the DEA wasn't going to stand around and let states be the "laboratory of democracy".
No way, the states were impeding the DEA's scope of domestic power.

So they sat down with Obama, and told him how it's going to be, which generates pressure on the DoJ -which resulted in the shift from the Ogden memo to the Cole memo -and not happy with the fact ( which ALTHEA IS correct about) some weed was getting diverted.

They did the same thing down here in Florida, for pain clinics, Fl had lax controls, and the DEA pushed for a state database, so now if you want pain meds -other than Tramadol (Ultram) - you have to get an MRI, and such. i can cost hundreds of $$.
With the database the DEA can and DOES -look thru Rx's, and will go after a Dr. with criminal charges.

It happened to a good decent dr, that used to write me pain meds, when I needed them for sciatica.
Orlando doctor accused of running pill mill wants trial's venue changedOrlando Sentinel
Attorneys for an Orlando doctor accused of running a pill-mill argued Wednesday that there's too much publicity on the prescription-drug epidemic in Central Florida for him to get a fair tria. But a judge said they need to try to pick a jury locally first before selecting a panel from outside the area.

Roman Mosai was arrested two years ago in one of the first large-scale investigations into Central Florida physicians accused of illegally prescribing highly addictive drugs such as painkillers http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...ill-change-of-venue-motion-management-clinics.

You mean THIS DOCTOR!!

Another tip was from a mother who said her 23-year-old son, who was addicted to painkillers, was seeing two doctors who were doling out prescription drugs "like candy." One of those doctors, the mother said, was Moyer.
In the months that followed, according to documents in the case, MBI sent a confidential informant into Moyer's office on three occasions. During each visit, MBI agents said, Moyer illegally and without a valid medical reason prescribed painkillers and muscle relaxers. He was arrested in June and charged with oxycodone and hydrocodone trafficking. He did not return phone calls for comment.
Moyer is one of several Central Florida doctors arrested on charges they gave powerful, addictive prescription drugs to people who didn't need the medication.
Such investigations are complicated, time-consuming and vastly different from other drug cases — because unlike cocaine or marijuana, prescription drugs are legal.
But, authorities say, the probes are necessary to help curb the state's prescription-drug-abuse epidemic and help stop overdoses in Central Florida.


http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2010-12-20/health/os-prescription-drug-doctors-20101220_1_pill-mills-prescription-drugs-drug-cases
 
Wrong again.

The majority of Americans SUPPORT legalized marijuana.

Look, you can keep ignoring what I've already explained to you and throwing out polls, but the fact of the matter is, if most our our country wanted legalized marijuana, it would be law of the land, like in California. But that's simply not the case. There might be a larger "percentage" in polls conducted mainly in metro areas of the country, but the Congress doesn't operate on what is popular with the majority, they operate based on their constituencies. Again, you are actually making my point for me here, if the Federal government were out of the way, perhaps many of these states with large metro areas of pot heads, could gain the political momentum to pass statewide MM laws? As it stands, they can't, because they don't want to spend money defending themselves against Obama DoJ lawsuits, it's far too risky politically, and they can generally find other things to legislate, while keeping the 'issue' to trot out at election time, to rally the stupid pot heads who keep supporting them.
 
Look, you can keep ignoring what I've already explained to you and throwing out polls, but the fact of the matter is, if most our our country wanted legalized marijuana, it would be law of the land, like in California. But that's simply not the case. There might be a larger "percentage" in polls conducted mainly in metro areas of the country, but the Congress doesn't operate on what is popular with the majority, they operate based on their constituencies. Again, you are actually making my point for me here, if the Federal government were out of the way, perhaps many of these states with large metro areas of pot heads, could gain the political momentum to pass statewide MM laws? As it stands, they can't, because they don't want to spend money defending themselves against Obama DoJ lawsuits, it's far too risky politically, and they can generally find other things to legislate, while keeping the 'issue' to trot out at election time, to rally the stupid pot heads who keep supporting them.

No, it wouldn't, a majority of citizens wanted a single payor healthcare and we didn't get it. We don't really have representation in Washington anymore, they pretty much do what the money men tell them to do!
 
Look, you can keep ignoring what I've already explained to you and throwing out polls, but the fact of the matter is, if most our our country wanted legalized marijuana, it would be law of the land, like in California. But that's simply not the case. There might be a larger "percentage" in polls conducted mainly in metro areas of the country, but the Congress doesn't operate on what is popular with the majority, they operate based on their constituencies. Again, you are actually making my point for me here, if the Federal government were out of the way, perhaps many of these states with large metro areas of pot heads, could gain the political momentum to pass statewide MM laws? As it stands, they can't, because they don't want to spend money defending themselves against Obama DoJ lawsuits, it's far too risky politically, and they can generally find other things to legislate, while keeping the 'issue' to trot out at election time, to rally the stupid pot heads who keep supporting them.

You can ignore whatever pleases you .. doesn't change a thing.

Start from here .. you don't speak for the American people .. consistent broad-based polling does.

Not only does a MAJORITY OF AMERICANS support legalized marijuana .. the issue of marijuana legalization is a WINNING issue for politicians.

And yes, I will keep ignoring the false information that you spew.
 
Wrong again.

The majority of Americans SUPPORT legalized marijuana.

Majority of Americans support marijuana legalization
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/183541/majority-of-americans-support-marijuana-legalization/

Most Americans Want Marijuana Legalized and Regulated
The latest public opinion poll shows that a growing majority of American voters support the legalization and regulation of marijuana.

http://www.alternet.org/story/155564/most_americans_want_marijuana_legalized_and_regulated

Where in the hell do you get such bad information?
I'll be back to comment on other posts here...but the vast majority of Americans didn't want black people to serve next to white people in the military, have the right to vote, eat in 'whites only' diners....etc.

If the majority of Americans didn't want birth control to be legal, is that a valid reason to grant their wish?




edit...I see you were responding to the idiot. I'm guessing you don't believe that majority rule is automatically a valid reason for legislation?
 
I'll be back to comment on other posts here...but the vast majority of Americans didn't want black people to serve next to white people in the military, have the right to vote, eat in 'whites only' diners....etc.

If the majority of Americans didn't want birth control to be legal, is that a valid reason to grant their wish?




edit...I see you were responding to the idiot. I'm guessing you don't believe that majority rule is automatically a valid reason for legislation?

These issues do not suppress others rights. This majority supports others rights. There is a difference. When majority support the rights of others, Congress should support the majority.
 
-no Roman Mosai ( a Pakistani whom is nationalized) not Moyer -though I can see how close the names are, easily missed.

You are correct.
When I goggled his name, the link that came up had him in the tag line; but I didn't notice that he wasn't in the article.

Here is a related article:

And on Thursday, local, state and federal law-enforcement officials announced arrests of 172 accused of being street-level prescription-drug dealers in Central Florida, including two doctors.

The arrests culminated a five-month investigation into criminal prescription pill enterprises, but the probe is ongoing, officials said. Several guns and more than 20,000 pills were seized during the drug sweeps.

Agents arrested Roman Mosai, 61, of Westside Medical Center in Orlando, and Michael Moyer, 59, , whose office is in Winter Park. Both were charged with trafficking in hydrocodone.

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2010-06-03/news/os-orlando-drug-arrests-20100603_1_prescription-drugs-drug-trafficking-pain-clinics

What about him makes you describe him as "good decent dr"?
 
ya. it's freaking side splitting affair, Let's start with this - Dr's write Rx's based on subjective criteria - recall MM is a Schedule 1 drug "no legitimate uses" by the FDA.
We both know there are medicaa uses - beyond the one's you mentions such as cancer pain, or AIDS wasting syndrome.
I've found evidence it even helps with retinitis pigmentosa. Also macular degeneration -and glaucoma. 100's of conditions.
The problem with glaucoma is the reduction in occolar pressure is only short alleviation - so pharmaceutical drugs are more long lasting, but MM still works.
We agree about medicinal uses....but glaucoma isn't cured by weed. It only lessens the discomfort. And it should be recategorized if what you say is true.

Start to do some reseacrh ( or i'll do it if necessary) that shows 100's of uses for MM - even cannibinois #5 is in research for flesh eating bacteria/
The point here is there are so many uses, and since the Dr.'s may know them, they prescribe, what you (not you personally) don't easily
recognize as normal useage.
Which means there are ppl spread out all over that stae/country whom may find alleviation from MM.
Until the fed's re-Schedule -it's up to Dr's to use their best judgement -because there isn't any PDR(Physician's Desk Reference) they can refer to.
There are some things weed works very well for. Others, not so well. Regardless, my point is that there are thousands and thousands of scammers on both sides of the doctor's desk. Those people are making it harder for the real patients to obtain 'legal' weed.

I still don't see the problem. There's a ton of weed to be had, at much cheaper prices than the dispensaries.




All of which shows possibly millions of Rx's may be written for the 'burnouts' whom really are patients
. Yea...the guy in Cal. claims to get paranoid in crowds, so he gets the right to buy 2 ounces/month.

Give me a fuckin break.
But you deny the widespread useage is legit. I don't affirm,but i'm not in denial either. I figure is this odd situation; it's up to the Dr. and patient
.What I'm denying, is that there was a valid reason for the jump in medical marijuana use after Obama's inauguration.



Ok. what point are you making here? Thtat's its difficult to research? I agree. you have an illegal drug used for medical uses, there is going to be "skewed data"
The efficacy of mm isn't hard to research. If you read the Wiki link, you'll see that many cities in Cal. actually said that local weed laws must comply with fed. laws. That was meant to keep the dispensaries/growers out of the area. These cities are within their rights to do so, and it gives the feds the right to crack down.

What gets hard to find, is the data that illustrates the jump in mm use since Obama took office, as well as the varied methods the doctors/patients use to scam the system.

There are pages of people bitching about Obama's supposed lies, and I simply don't have the time to get to the facts buried underneath.

Bottom line....Obama called for medical marijuana to be regulated the way other drugs are. That isn't happening. It's a revolving door between the docs, and the dispensaries.
LA banned the entire industry. check out this clusterfuck
For years, Los Angeles has been a mecca for medical marijuana dispensaries. Anyone with a doctor's recommendation could stop in at chic storefronts offering cannabis-laced desserts or at the more underground clinics, labeled only with a green cross. Hundreds, maybe 1,000 of these pot shops popped up around L.A.

City officials tried to get a handle on the proliferation, with endless meetings, community hearings, police raids and lawsuits. Finally, the council decided "enough is enough," says City Councilman Jose Huizar, who wrote a bill outlawing all dispensaries. The council overwhelmingly passed the ban in July.

"It was getting way out of control," Huizar says. "A thousand dispensaries? Some neighborhoods have two per block, and young people have access. They go around the corner, they smoke it. Crime increases around these dispensaries, the traffic, the robberies."
This is what I'm saying. You continue to fault Obama for this. Although...I don't buy the bullshit about crime increasing. But I've seen videos of kids leaving the dispensary, and smoking with friends in the parking lot.

And the weed is about $600/ounce...twice street value. Still not enough to make me believe that kids are stealing to pay for weed.




His group is suing the city over its handling of medical marijuana clinics. His colleague Tiffany Wright, who says she's a cannabis patient, says the city's ban would drive legitimate users underground.

"I feel like we're almost being forced back into the dark ages," she says. "Nobody that I know who's a card-carrying patient wants to get their medicine from some suspect in a dark alley, that could potentially be contaminated with mold and pesticides, with no knowledge of who grew it or where it's been grown."[/U]http://www.npr.org/2012/09/06/160654734/los-angeles-pot-ban-suspended-for-now

The issue is that less than an ounce of illegal weed is still a minor infraction in many states. Are you willing to put scammers in jail, in order to keep the patients who need it in a position to get it?

Obama isn't.
Better to have access then not -where we seem to hit the wall of disagreement. Sure there are scammers, but we're talking weed, one of the most innocuous substances around. You can't get sick/overdose on weed. CAUTION: "burnout zone" is possible.
My argument here rests only in your insistence that:

Obama lied (he didn't)

His Justice Dept. is busting up innocent dispensaries for no reason, save for the future of Sativex.

Other than that, you're preaching to the choir.


I'm sure, im not all that interested, as I don't consider it a problem as much as denying legitimate useage. It's early for me, but the "weed war thread" shows just how patchwork a state network we have, there are going to be problems in diagnosis, distribution.
Until it becomes something other then Schedule 1, it's best to do what Ryan said." Let the states handle their own affairs".
Obama did promise that much (sorta. like he always weseals his words).

There are legal ways to change the system. Trying to skirt fed. laws via bogus doctors isn't the way to do it. If that many people were that angry, we'd hear about it this election year.

The fact is, anyone who wants weed has it. There is no shortage of pot in this country.



We can quibble over what was said, but unleashinfg the USDA's on fishing expeditions was clearly something he didn't say.
He even got a new memo (Cole ) -I think it's DEA presure, but Obama already used Exec priv. to "sop disclosure of DoJ internal deliberaion" in Fast and Furious -so we're just guessing.

-

I already posted his EXACT words. If you refuse to read them, then I guess that's your right.





The real answer is to put in in legit pharmacies - as a Schedule 2 drug. Until that happens, dispensarys have to self screen ,and keep records.
most do that,if itis a clinic that doesnt -OK shut it down.
Obama called for strict regulation. The current system is anything but strict. There's a lot of work to be done yet.


But until the DEA gets off this, and lets the states do their best, all this accomplishes is driving the underground market
.

Underground market costs less, and the quality is just as good. Why do the growers vote against legalization?


Have a good one Althea -I got termite prob to take care of again ( damn Florida is a swamp)
Damn....at least you know about it. I remember the last time you had to treat.
 
These issues do not suppress others rights. This majority supports others rights. There is a difference. When majority support the rights of others, Congress should support the majority.
That's a valid point. So why don't we see an uprising?

Because anyone who wants weed, already has it.
 
Desh, there are no Federal laws that allow MJ distribution, medical or otherwise. It would not be their "duty" to ensure the State laws that allow people to break the Federal laws are followed. It never has been their "duty" to do that.
 
What about him makes you describe him as "good decent dr"?
because i've been to Croakers offices, where it's "what can I write for you?" to "I'm not giving you anything -getout
-and "show me where you hurt and describe the hurt.

I also expect a Dr. to at least touch me before writing pain pills. He was compasionate, but not a fool for junkies.
 
because i've been to Croakers offices, where it's "what can I write for you?" to "I'm not giving you anything -getout
-and "show me where you hurt and describe the hurt.

I also expect a Dr. to at least touch me before writing pain pills. He was compasionate, but not a fool for junkies.

I have no idea who "Croaker" is, so continuing is ineffectual.
 
I'll be back to comment on other posts here...but the vast majority of Americans didn't want black people to serve next to white people in the military, have the right to vote, eat in 'whites only' diners....etc.

If the majority of Americans didn't want birth control to be legal, is that a valid reason to grant their wish?

edit...I see you were responding to the idiot. I'm guessing you don't believe that majority rule is automatically a valid reason for legislation?

Marijuana legislation is a long ass way from terrorism, murder, and oppression of human beings.

No, I do not believe that majority rule alone is a valid reason for legislation, but in this case, it makes very good sense for a whole lot of reasons .. not the least of which is the astronomical cost of enforcement, AND, our prisons are filled with non-violent criminals, AND, alcohol is much more harmful than weed.

This is no different than prohibition.
 
Marijuana legislation is a long ass way from terrorism, murder, and oppression of human beings.

No, I do not believe that majority rule alone is a valid reason for legislation, but in this case, it makes very good sense for a whole lot of reasons .. not the least of which is the astronomical cost of enforcement, AND, our prisons are filled with non-violent criminals, AND, alcohol is much more harmful than weed.

This is no different than prohibition.

That's because it is prohibition. We have an urge to continuously repeat stupid ideas in the US. Prohibition didn't work, so we try it again every 50 years or so and take longer each time to comprehend what a stupid idea it is to create a black market for stuff that makes people feel good.

If the idea is to keep it away from kids, it is far more difficult to get beer underage than it is to get cocaine. Nobody is checking your ID when you buy cocaine.
 
I'll be back to comment on other posts here...but the vast majority of Americans didn't want black people to serve next to white people in the military, have the right to vote, eat in 'whites only' diners....etc.

If the majority of Americans didn't want birth control to be legal, is that a valid reason to grant their wish?




edit...I see you were responding to the idiot. I'm guessing you don't believe that majority rule is automatically a valid reason for legislation?

Ummmm, mj was outlawed as a way to oppress minorities. The war was escalated by Nixon as a way to intimidate and silence his critics. Minor drug charges hurt minorities most. Legalization is analagous to ending the evils you mention. Nice try, but that is a big F.
 
That's because it is prohibition. We have an urge to continuously repeat stupid ideas in the US. Prohibition didn't work, so we try it again every 50 years or so and take longer each time to comprehend what a stupid idea it is to create a black market for stuff that makes people feel good.

If the idea is to keep it away from kids, it is far more difficult to get beer underage than it is to get cocaine. Nobody is checking your ID when you buy cocaine.

I don't disagree with that.
 
Althea;1073697[QUOTE said:
We agree about medicinal uses....but glaucoma isn't cured by weed. It only lessens the discomfort. And it should be recategorized if what you say is true.
It reduces interocular pressue as well as RX. drugs, without side effects. But Rx. drugs are longer lasting. Who knows the ultimate potential, sorry my words are sloppy on that lasts post, i'm beat down tired -wanted to try to reply tonight ,so...........
Go after porly run clinics, give the states time to set there standadrs -this just worked it way thru the CA Supreme Court.

L. ANGELES, Sept. 8, 2012 — Long Beach Municipal Code Chapter 5.89, a city law banning all medical cannabis collectives, was deemed preempted by state law and invalid by a Los Angeles Superior Court judge.
In early July, 2012, the Ca. Second District Court of Appeal struck-down Los Angeles County Code section 22.56.196(B), a ban of all collectives similar to LBMC 5.89. In an order dated August 17, 2012, in Victoria Pappas v. City of Long Beach, LASC No. BC484645, Judge James R. Dunn wrote, “LBMC Chapter 5.89 is virtually identical to LACC 22.56.196(B) and is therefore preempted by state law.” Matthew Pappas, attorney for Victoria Pappas, his daughter and plaintiff in the case, said “The Judge’s decision properly reflects the law in California and protects patients like Tori from discriminatory laws like 5.89.”
http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/1112689964/long-beach-city-ban-on-medical-marijuana-found-to-be/

There are some things weed works very well for. Others, not so well. Regardless, my point is that there are thousands and thousands of scammers on both sides of the doctor's desk. Those people are making it harder for the real patients to obtain 'legal' weed.

I still don't see the problem. There's a ton of weed to be had, at much cheaper prices than the dispensaries
.
There isn't the variey a good dispensary can offer you, and even a consultation. Patients can't grow different strains, not even co-opts -it takes growers to provide enough quantity to supply CA dispensarys. Dispensaries give constant easy acces,and the right type of cannibus for the patient to choose.

Yea...the guy in Cal. claims to get paranoid in crowds, so he gets the right to buy 2 ounces/month
Give me a fuckin break.
.What I'm denying, is that there was a valid reason for the jump in medical marijuana use after Obama's inauguration.
The rise in use is 2 fold, a more secure (past) feeling that dispesarys can operate without draconian Fed'l 'oversight' - remember growers ar legitimately needed for supply.

I am not so stupid not to agree with you here also that a good portion is the fact that more access would lead to more diversion, I have to agree on this .

The efficacy of mm isn't hard to research. If you read the Wiki link, you'll see that many cities in Cal. actually said that local weed laws must comply with fed. laws. That was meant to keep the dispensaries/growers out of the area. These cities are within their rights to do so, and it gives the feds the right to crack down.
Then what is the point to even have a dispensary system? Fed'l law prohibits distribution, or possession. Period. As to growers, the cities can ban them, but if they do, there won't be enough for legimate supply t opatients. The Dispensary rely on big growers to supply them.

gets hard to find, is the data that illustrates the jump in mm use since Obama took office, as well as the varied methods the doctors/patients use to scam the system.

There are pages of people bitching about Obama's supposed lies, and I simply don't have the time to get to the facts buried underneath.

Bottom line....Obama called for medical marijuana to be regulated the way other drugs are. That isn't happening. It's a revolving door between the docs, and the dispensaries
.Unclear( might be i'm tired).
Obama promised not to go after individuals,yes. The Ogden Memo was the operating policy.
In it, Ogden announced that federal prosecutors “should not focus federal resources . . . on individuals whose actions are in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for the medical use of marijuana.” Thus, if a state permits individuals to grow their own marijuana for personal medical use, DOJ would not prosecute them. The memo also announced that federal officials should not focus on people who provide marijuana to patients in compliance with state law — prosecuting “those caregivers in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state law who provide such individuals with marijuana, is unlikely to be an efficient use of limited federal resources.”
Again the "revolving door is how CA chooses to set it up -other states do not, and standards are chilling DE. implementation.

This is what I'm saying. You continue to fault Obama for this. Although...I don't buy the bullshit about crime increasing. But I've seen videos of kids leaving the dispensary, and smoking with friends in the parking lot.

And the weed is about $600/ounce...twice street value. Still not enough to make me believe that kids are stealing to pay for weed.


The issue is that less than an ounce of illegal weed is still a minor infraction in many states. Are you willing to put scammers in jail, in order to keep the patients who need it in a position to get it?

Obama isn't
.
Obama/Holder/Dea -all one and the same are making it more difficult for patients to get their MM - great, no federal charges for possession, but if Fed policy shuts down clinics....which is my concern, so patients do not have to be exposed to street buys, sick ppll should have access.
My argument here rests only in your insistence that:

Obama lied (he didn't)

Other than that, you're preaching to the choir
Ok I'll drop the "lie -to end this between us, we'll say he "clarifyed" as he calls it.
I don't give a shit about Obama's reputation, just his actions by using the Cole memo rather then the HUMANE Ogden memo.

The proof that the Cole memo is a disaterous shift, is it has derailed any confidence in landlords to rent to dispensarys, growers to supply, and dispensarys to open up as private business.

Whatever the heck you wanna call Obama's chess move -it scrambled the board to an incoherent mess, that it has to be reset.
Because nobody knows where this is going, except for more letters of threat to seize landlord propperty by the RICO letters.(USDA)

Sativex is just the beginning, it is big pharmas attemp to use the cannibinoids, but patent the formulations. More formulations = more an longer patent rights.

There are legal ways to change the system. Trying to skirt fed. laws via bogus doctors isn't the way to do it. If that many people were that angry, we'd hear about it this election year
No you won't "hear it during an elction year" Ryans statement, and his aides "clarification"( that word again), was a 2 day story at best.
The problems of closure of the dispensarys, are not going to be heard during election year din.

The fact is, anyone who wants weed has it. There is no shortage of pot in this country.
ad hoc consctuctive
His Justice Dept. is busting up innocent dispensaries for no reason, save for the future of Sativex.

Obama called for strict regulation. The current system is anything but strict. There's a lot of work to be done yet.
Obama called for regulaton by state law -at least in the Ogden memo, that was his opening move as POTUS.
The current system is under construction, the best thing the Fed's can do is STAY OUT OF IT WHILE THE STATES 'CLARIFY' THEIR PROCEEDURES.
This is all new, whilethe system did allow too much diversion, it was a working system. Now it's blanketed to Death with fear and paper closures.

Underground market costs less, and the quality is just as good. Why do the growers vote against legalization?
you know more about growers then i do..beats me.
Damn....at least you know about it. I remember the last time you had to treat.

I ( a congractor, or friends)gotta tear out ALL the fucking drywall behing the shower, and possible along a seperation wall, with a bath in the other bedroom.

The drywall isn't Greenwall, it's not even up to code( it was 22 years agao) and it's saturated.
The fucking tile started to fall in, and down on me in the shower, the grout just gave way. I could have been cut by fallling ceramic tile. It's going to take days, and at least a grand -maybe more.

Fucking Buggy Florida.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top