ROFLMAO

You're right, Breitbart, who lies, IS funny.

http://www.salon.com/2011/02/14/floyd_abrams_what_shirley_sherrod_has_to_prove/

What is the definition of defamation?

Defamation is seriously defined as a statement that holds someone up to ridicule or the like. It is a statement which is likely to hurt the person — in her [Sherrod's] case in her personal or professional life — in a self-evidently negative manner.

Do Breitbart’s actions meet that criteria?

If it is true that he edited her speech in a way to change the meaning of it, that can pass the test for defamation. I mean, if [Breitbart] made her look as if she was denouncing all white people, when in fact she was explaining how her views changed through the years, that can be defamatory. I have no view on what it is he did or not, I’m just saying [that] if that’s what he did, it can be defamatory.

http://www.10news.com/news/deposition-reveals-payout-for-undercover-acorn-video

After the footage was posted by conservative activist Andrew Breitbart, Vera was fired. A state probe eventually confirmed Vera was simply playing along with the pimp conversation and had called police.

Eventually, amid a string of other videos, ACORN lost its federal funding and dissolved.

Vera filed suit, claiming O'Keefe had violated state privacy laws, and in a March deposition, there were some revealing statements from O'Keefe.

"He [Breitbart] said he would like to find a way for me to get paid to publish the videos," testified O'Keefe.

O'Keefe gave details about the payout. He testified that before the San Diego undercover taping, Breitbart first saw undercover ACORN videos from the East Coast and wanted to see more.

"Now we have evidence for the first time, Breitbart agreed in advance to participate in the violation of California law," said Gene Iredale, Vera's attorney.

O'Keefe said he was eventually paid $65,000 by Breitbart to blog about the video.

Vera's attorneys now plan to file suit against the estate of Breitbart, who recently died of heart failure.

Another key issue was why O'Keefe made only minimal attempts to follow up with Vera to confirm what was said in the footage.

"I did want to follow up," testified O'Keefe. "I just didn't end up following up."

"O'Keefe says it was investigative journalism. What do you call it?" asked 10News reporter Michael Chen.

Iredale responded, "I call it phony propaganda."

The state investigation also produced some harsh words for O'Keefe. Despite being granted immunity for turning over all the video, a report said he likely violated privacy laws.

The man is a buffoon along the lines of the lying Limbaugh.
 
Back
Top