In Three-Way Race Obama Leads Romney 49-42, Johnson Gets 6 Percent

Mott the Hoople said:
Gary Johnson would be the perfect President.....for Somalia.
Click to expand...
That statement is every bit as stupid as people saying that Obama is a socialist. It's hackish hyperbole and it should be beneath you. He is the SAME guy that was governor of New Mexico for 8 years, reduced the government payroll without firing a single person, never raised taxes, cut spending and left New Mexico with a 1 BILLION dollar surplus. Did your governor leave you with a surplus?
 
Socrtease said:
That statement is every bit as stupid as people saying that Obama is a socialist. It's hackish hyperbole and it should be beneath you. He is the SAME guy that was governor of New Mexico for 8 years, reduced the government payroll without firing a single person, never raised taxes, cut spending and left New Mexico with a 1 BILLION dollar surplus. Did your governor leave you with a surplus?
Click to expand...

For Ohio, a surplus would be a good sheering season.
 
By Mott's "logic," George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and James Monroe would all have been great presidents of Somalia. Instead, they set a standard for all American presidents to follow.
 
Socrtease said:
That statement is every bit as stupid as people saying that Obama is a socialist. It's hackish hyperbole and it should be beneath you. He is the SAME guy that was governor of New Mexico for 8 years, reduced the government payroll without firing a single person, never raised taxes, cut spending and left New Mexico with a 1 BILLION dollar surplus. Did your governor leave you with a surplus?
Click to expand...

Mott has often said Libertarians can't govern etc. etc. Well here you have evidence of one who did and did it quite well. Equating Libertarianism to anarchy is something you would expect to hear from someone from Michigan, not Ohio.
 
Socrtease said:
Not a joke at all. I expect that by the last week in October Johnson will poll in low double digits. That will more than likely hurt Mitt more than Obama. If Republican's can get off their socially conservative high horse, and vote for someone that absolutely positively will veto ANY tax increase, and ANY spending increase and who will absolutely work to reduce the size of the government payroll they will get a far better president than they will from Obama. Johnson is slowly but steadily picking up steam. Not enough to win, but enough to spoil.
Click to expand...

He could very well hurt Obama in the west. But not nearly as much as he will hurt Mitt in Florida. Go Johnson!
 
WinterBorn said:
Dixie, it comes down to a simple question of what matters.

Who best reflects what you want from a president, Romney or Johnson?
Click to expand...

What matters to me, more than anything under the sun, is removing the failed Marxist president.

What I want most in a president, is for him to not be a Marxist.

Johnson can't win, won't win. He will pull votes from the non-Marxist, so I can't vote for him, doesn't matter how great of a guy he is.
 
Socrtease said:
Obama Leads Romney 52-45 In New Reason-Rupe Poll; In Three-Way Race Obama Leads Romney 49-42, Johnson Gets 6 Percent

http://reason.com/blog/2012/09/21/obama-leads-romney-johnson-reason-poll

While it is only a small gain, it is nonetheless a gain, and my prediction is that the more Johnson tours universities the more college students are going to support him and the more coverage he will get in the news. It won't be enough to win but it will probably be enough to damage Romney's chances of a win. SO, here's my advice to all you Romney supporters, VOTE FOR JOHNSON! A vote for Mitt is becoming more and more just a wasted vote. He chances of winning are becoming slimmer and slimmer. If you join the 6 or 8% of us who already say we're voting for Johnson, together we can defeat Obama and you will get a small government fiscally conservative President with a proven track record of lower taxes and cutting spending. Those of us that are going to vote for Johnson will NEVER vote for Mitt or Obama. WE are not voting for ANYONE that will reauthorize the Patriot Act, or NDAA. We are not going to vote for anyone that chooses to use the Military without a direct threat to the US, we are not going to vote for someone that cannot see that the war on drugs is as futile as prohibition was in the 20's and 30's. In short we are not jumping ship to vote for the same old guy with a different face, or the same face for that matter. Be Libertarian with us just one election. We will not only get rid of Obama but we will change the way the white house is run and how the president views legislation. LIVE FREE!
Click to expand...

Not a three way race, Johnson doesn't have close to 6% support.
 
Joseph Stalin said:
You guys nominated Romney, not us.
Click to expand...

I didn't nominate Romney because I didn't vote for him in the primaries. Still, Romney was voted for by most GOP voters in the primaries, therefore, he was nominated. He wasn't my first, second, third, fourth or fifth choice, but he was who the GOP picked. Now, in our system, either the Dems or GOP will win the election, and the Dems are represented by a Marxist. I'm voting for the party that can defeat the Marxist, the ONLY party who can defeat the Marxist. You're using your vote to make some kind of political statement, and in years past, I might join you in doing so, but this particular election is too important to lose to the Marxist, if we do, we're toast. I have to vote "my country" before "my conscience" because I love my country more than I love myself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top