Romney Inflated 2011 Taxes

hazlnut said:
When he loses, he's going to be screaming blood-murder about what waste the "fake" tax returns were and demanding that someone get his money back for him....

This guy is going down in flames.
Click to expand...

he won't have to scream.. he can just file an amended return and get the money he paid back..
 
Rune said:
I know, I was making a different point since your total bullshit wasn't worthy of a response.
Click to expand...

Right. Hence the need to quote my post, you weren't really answering it... We totally believe you.

Mind reading again? You don't know what I think, stop being so embarrassingly presumptive.
Click to expand...
What? I simply restated a previous position. It has nothing to do with "mind reading" nor did it even mention you other than simply ask if you even read the post you quoted.



Please point out why income produced from "post tax dollar money" should be taxed at a lower rate than other income.
Click to expand...
The reason it was mentioned is to point out a difference between pre-tax dollars invested in other positions. Which doesn't change that the people you hurt most with a hike in Capital Gains taxes are not the 1%.


If you are going to be an ass when responding you must really need the ego boost. Far be it for me to deny your needs.
Click to expand...
Again, if you plan on acting the ass you should at least take the time to appear to have the ability to comprehend the post you quote. At this point you have demonstrated a total lack of comprehension, twice.

If you plan on not responding to my post, don't bother quoting it in the first place. Taking it apart in a dissection and saying nothing at all relative to the post just made you look like a total ass.
 
\\((|))// said:
The tax rate on long-term gains was reduced in 1997 via the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 from 28% to 20% and again in 2003, via the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, from 20% to 15%...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_gains_tax#United_States


So if the JPP righties are correct, investment was curtailed in America prior to 1997?
Click to expand...

Again, the goal was to create churn and give retirees a break at the same time. It was one of the measures taken to create that "budget surplus" that never materialized other than on paper (due to spending not revenue). The revenues increased because people were more willing to churn investments that otherwise they may have invested differently to avoid tax exposure.
 
Rune said:
Interesting.
It seems that Damo and Dixie may indeed be entirely wrong in their premise, at least according to this study; http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57430180-93/turns-out-investing-in-venture-capital-funds-isnt-a-great-idea/



It seems that investments made BEFORE the capital gains rate was slashed perform MUCH better. Hmm.
Click to expand...

Who said anything about investing in Capital Venture Funds? Now you just make whatever you want up? Either you really are an ass or you flat understand nothing about what I have said in this thread. If you can ever find one post that I told anybody to invest in Capital Venture funds I'll eat my shoes.
 
Libtards are a hoot. First they falsely claim that Romney didn't pay any taxes then when they get fisted on that after Romney shows that he paid almost $2 million they claim he paid too much on purpose.

I wish I could make this stuff up
 
Damocles said:
Who said anything about investing in Capital Venture Funds? Now you just make whatever you want up? Either you really are an ass or you flat understand nothing about what I have said in this thread. If you can ever find one post that I told anybody to invest in Capital Venture funds I'll eat my shoes.
Click to expand...

Dixie. Talk about reading comprehension issues. You are not the only RWA in this thread.
 
Damocles said:
Right. Hence the need to quote my post, you weren't really answering it... We totally believe you.


What? I simply restated a previous position. It has nothing to do with "mind reading" nor did it even mention you other than simply ask if you even read the post you quoted.




The reason it was mentioned is to point out a difference between pre-tax dollars invested in other positions. Which doesn't change that the people you hurt most with a hike in Capital Gains taxes are not the 1%.



Again, if you plan on acting the ass you should at least take the time to appear to have the ability to comprehend the post you quote. At this point you have demonstrated a total lack of comprehension, twice.

If you plan on not responding to my post, don't bother quoting it in the first place. Taking it apart in a dissection and saying nothing at all relative to the post just made you look like a total ass.
Click to expand...

Nice deflection/non-reply.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top