Without saying the word Obama, Tell me why you like Mitt Romney?

Now imagine if someone were to say the same thing about Obama? That after Obama loses Romney will turn him into one of those lawn jockeys, drug Moochelle and sell her to a new slave master.

Your head would explode, but then I would never presume that libtards like you would ever acknowledge their double standards

Obama will treat the Romney's with the same sort of compassion that they treated the beings they claimed to love. Your comments are simply based on race. That makes them.... you guessed it, racist. Thanks for playing.
 
Can you explain why without using the words "white" or Black"?

Believe me that color/race has nothing to do with why I want Mr. Obama to lose. In fact I would rather him lose to someone like Alan Keyes, Herman Cain, Marco Rubio or J.C. Watts than to Mitt Romney.
 
Last edited:
Yep....him too. Any of the guys mentioned would be better than Romney IMO....but alas Romney's who we got.
 
Romney is a proven business leader, with a track record of success. He has taken over companies (Bane) and projects (Olympics) that were in the red, and turned them into profit-makers. He presided as governor over a very liberal state as a conservative republican, demonstrating an almost miraculous ability to get bipartisan results in passing legislation and enacting changes. Unlike many politicians who only talk the talk when it comes to helping the needy, Romney walks the walk, to the tune of millions each year, above and beyond the call for charity. He is pragmatic and sensible, fairly well-articulate and reasonable in his demeanor and rapport. He is not a hothead, or a hawkish warmonger who would entangle us in unnecessary wars and altercations, he holds a close affection for his Mormon beliefs as a peacemaker and caretaker of humanity, and has repeatedly demonstrated this in his personal life. He is a loving husband to his amazing wife, with no history of infidelity, and virtually no indication from any of his children that his parenting skills were inept in any way. He appears to be a perfectly moral and competent man, who understands principals of capitalism and business, a problem solver and solutionist, as well as someone who can get along with Liberals and actually get things done in government. I personally think this is one of his best assets, he's apparently The Pinhead Whisperer!

Done... Obama wasn't mentioned once!

Now... without mentioning Republicans, can you explain why Obama deserves 4 more years?
He doesn't.
 
Romney is a proven business leader, with a track record of success. He has taken over companies (Bane) and projects (Olympics) that were in the red, and turned them into profit-makers. He presided as governor over a very liberal state as a conservative republican, demonstrating an almost miraculous ability to get bipartisan results in passing legislation and enacting changes. Unlike many politicians who only talk the talk when it comes to helping the needy, Romney walks the walk, to the tune of millions each year, above and beyond the call for charity. He is pragmatic and sensible, fairly well-articulate and reasonable in his demeanor and rapport. He is not a hothead, or a hawkish warmonger who would entangle us in unnecessary wars and altercations, he holds a close affection for his Mormon beliefs as a peacemaker and caretaker of humanity, and has repeatedly demonstrated this in his personal life. He is a loving husband to his amazing wife, with no history of infidelity, and virtually no indication from any of his children that his parenting skills were inept in any way. He appears to be a perfectly moral and competent man, who understands principals of capitalism and business, a problem solver and solutionist, as well as someone who can get along with Liberals and actually get things done in government. I personally think this is one of his best assets, he's apparently The Pinhead Whisperer!

Done... Obama wasn't mentioned once!

Now... without mentioning Republicans, can you explain why Obama deserves 4 more years?
Ok, I will give you credit for stating why you support Romney. Now lets talk about some of your reasons. As governor of Massachusetts Romney was a conservative? He refused to sign a pledge to not raise taxes, after being given emergency powers by the legislature is raised 57 existing fees and created 33 new fees to borne by the people of Massachusetts. He created near universal health care in Mass., including individual mandates which he praised Obama for early on when Obama care was still being considered. Romney supported the Federal Assault Weapons ban and signed a Mass. law that did the same thing. In March 2002 during his run for governor, Romney told the Lowell Sun that, "On a personal basis, I don't favor abortion. However, as governor of the commonwealth, I will protect a woman's right to choose under the laws of the country and the commonwealth. That's the same position I've had for many years." Also, during the 2002 governor's race, Romney's platform stated, "As Governor, Mitt Romney would protect the current pro-choice status quo in Massachusetts. No law would change. The choice to have an abortion is a deeply personal one. Women should be free to choose based on their own beliefs, not the government's." Romney promised to "preserve and protect a woman's right to choose" and declared "I will not change any provisions in Massachusetts' pro-choice laws". Dixie he was NOT a conservative in the land of liberals, he was a moderate, the kind you have vilified over and over on this site, and now you call him a conservative.
 
Ok, I will give you credit for stating why you support Romney. Now lets talk about some of your reasons. As governor of Massachusetts Romney was a conservative? He refused to sign a pledge to not raise taxes, after being given emergency powers by the legislature is raised 57 existing fees and created 33 new fees to borne by the people of Massachusetts. He created near universal health care in Mass., including individual mandates which he praised Obama for early on when Obama care was still being considered. Romney supported the Federal Assault Weapons ban and signed a Mass. law that did the same thing. In March 2002 during his run for governor, Romney told the Lowell Sun that, "On a personal basis, I don't favor abortion. However, as governor of the commonwealth, I will protect a woman's right to choose under the laws of the country and the commonwealth. That's the same position I've had for many years." Also, during the 2002 governor's race, Romney's platform stated, "As Governor, Mitt Romney would protect the current pro-choice status quo in Massachusetts. No law would change. The choice to have an abortion is a deeply personal one. Women should be free to choose based on their own beliefs, not the government's." Romney promised to "preserve and protect a woman's right to choose" and declared "I will not change any provisions in Massachusetts' pro-choice laws". Dixie he was NOT a conservative in the land of liberals, he was a moderate, the kind you have vilified over and over on this site, and now you call him a conservative.

He was more conservative than anything offered by the Democrats. His principles aren't in line with the Marxist left. Yes, he signed things into law in Massachusetts which aren't conservative, but these were things passed by his liberal congress. No doubt, as president he might do some things that I don't like, as a conservative, but whatever he does will be markedly better than the Marxists. I never said Romney was "perfect" or that he would be the ideal president. You asked, without mentioning Obama, what did I like about him, and I told you. I think he is reasonable well-articulated man who has good character and integrity and would make a good leader. The very things you wish to call him into question over, are some of the qualities which would make him a good president... (not ideal, but good.)

Here's what you have to keep in mind, we don't live in the society you wish we lived in. The majority of America doesn't think exactly like you, or exactly like myself. Most fall somewhere in between, or maybe even completely opposite of both our ideals, but we are all going to elect a president. It's not going to be Gary Johnson, just as it won't be Rosanne Barr. It will either be Barack Obama for 4 more years, or Mitt Romney... I say we give Mitt a shot, and see how he does? He can't possibly be any worse than the Marxist.
 
Back
Top