Exactamondo!

Stymie

Stymie

New member
This is what guys like me and Tom have been trying to say but not as effectively or as heart-jerkingly beautifully.

I think that seduction is the same, functionally and morally, as intimidation.\\

I'll start with functionally: seduction aims to use a man's desire against him by giving him the possibly false impression that he may have sexual relations with the seducer. By doing so he may make decisions that he might not otherwise make (buying a drink at a bar, paying for a purse, etc.) Intimidation does the same; the prospect of physical, monetary or emotional pain subjects the subordinate into doing things they might not otherwise do. Both of these options result in the same consequence of the dominant one convincing the subordinate that it is in their best interest to do something that is not in their best interest.

Now morally: the main claim against male intimidation is that men, on average bigger and stronger, are being unjust by asserting a natural superiority. By doing so they have an unfair disadvantage. But sexually, don't women have that same power? Men are genetically predisposed to look for mating opportunities in all women, and when a woman presents that opportunity, even the most iron-willed man could fall prey. I think everyone here can identify a situation in which they or others have given undue attention or favor to a woman who seems a possible sexual partner. Bought her shoes. Again, picked up her bar tab. Doesn't that result in the same affect as intimidation?

I've paid for too many goddamned purses in my time and I've lost count of the number of drinks I bought some dumb ho in a bar only to find her sneaking out the back door with some String-like pretty boy! I have been intimidated for the last time! I am going pussy-free from now on! This time voluntarily though. The previous pussy-free decade and a half don't count because that was forced upon me bygreedy dumb ho's!
Click to expand...
 
Joseph Stalin said:
If there was any doubt to who this is, you're a fucking moron and deserve to die in a fire.
Click to expand...

If I wanted to hide who I am from you I could in two seconds flat. I knew it'd give you a thrill to brag about how you know with your special mod powers. I bet you are jumping out of your seat dying to say. I give zero fucks.
 
I've paid for too many goddamned purses in my time and I've lost count of the number of drinks I bought some dumb ho in a bar only to find her sneaking out the back door with some String-like pretty boy! I have been intimidated for the last time! I am going pussy-free from now on! This time voluntarily though. The previous pussy-free decade and a half don't count because that was forced upon me by greedy dumb ho's!
Click to expand...

:rofl2:

Right! You're not really repulsive - it's just that women are greedy dumb ho's!
 
I don't know about you guys but I always thought of seduction as having the skill of being able to talk a woman out of her panties instead of buying them from her. Intimidating them off of her is rape.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
I don't know about you guys but I always thought of seduction as having the skill of being able to talk a woman out of her panties instead of buying them from her. Intimidating them off of her is rape.
Click to expand...

No shit Mutt... thanks for stating the blatantly obvious. The only thing more obvious is who Stymie is.
 
Bijou said:
Stymie's obviously a pathetic needledick who completely empathizes with the other needledick's "plight".

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

There must be a lot of them around here because I noticed that few (and there are a few notable exceptions they know who they are) seem to have noticed that Tom has developed quite the obsession with bashing women. He's at it all day and night long here.

Imagine if he were posting those things about people of color. Why Soc and Mott wouldn't be playing slap and tickle with him, and SF probably would have even jumped at the chance to show how "reasonable" and "moderate" he is by telling that racist off!

But hey, it's just women...what's the harm?

Poor bastards obviously haven't had any success with women...I definitely think you hit the nail on the head. WHich is why he IA'd you so fast. Don't get cocky though - he claimed to have IA'd me weeks ago! He never had. He lies...
 
Darla said:
There must be a lot of them around here because I noticed that few (and there are a few notable exceptions they know who they are) seem to have noticed that Tom has developed quite the obsession with bashing women. He's at it all day and night long here.

Imagine if he were posting those things about people of color. Why Soc and Mott wouldn't be playing slap and tickle with him, and SF probably would have even jumped at the chance to show how "reasonable" and "moderate" he is by telling that racist off!

But hey, it's just women...what's the harm?

Poor bastards obviously haven't had any success with women...I definitely think you hit the nail on the head. WHich is why he IA'd you so fast. Don't get cocky though - he claimed to have IA'd me weeks ago! He never had. He lies...
Click to expand...

I think it's funny that he had to put me on ignore. Fucking hilarious. Not to mention completely ineffective, because I will continue to respond and underscore his needledick idiocy and everyone else can still see it. :)
 
Darla said:
There must be a lot of them around here because I noticed that few (and there are a few notable exceptions they know who they are) seem to have noticed that Tom has developed quite the obsession with bashing women. He's at it all day and night long here.

Imagine if he were posting those things about people of color. Why Soc and Mott wouldn't be playing slap and tickle with him, and SF probably would have even jumped at the chance to show how "reasonable" and "moderate" he is by telling that racist off!

But hey, it's just women...what's the harm?

Poor bastards obviously haven't had any success with women...I definitely think you hit the nail on the head. WHich is why he IA'd you so fast. Don't get cocky though - he claimed to have IA'd me weeks ago! He never had. He lies...
Click to expand...
Slap and tickle?
 
Darla said:
There must be a lot of them around here because I noticed that few (and there are a few notable exceptions they know who they are) seem to have noticed that Tom has developed quite the obsession with bashing women. He's at it all day and night long here.

Imagine if he were posting those things about people of color. Why Soc and Mott wouldn't be playing slap and tickle with him, and SF probably would have even jumped at the chance to show how "reasonable" and "moderate" he is by telling that racist off!

But hey, it's just women...what's the harm?

Poor bastards obviously haven't had any success with women...I definitely think you hit the nail on the head. WHich is why he IA'd you so fast. Don't get cocky though - he claimed to have IA'd me weeks ago! He never had. He lies...
Click to expand...
It's a lose/lose situation for us guys Darla. If we act like insufferable pricks we get called mysoginist (or needle dicks) but if we behave like senstive gentlemen we get called "whimpy" or "mommas boys".

I look at it like this though. There's life with women, which is often filled with stressfull drama and then there's the nice quiet life without women, which pretty much sucks.
 
Last edited:
Mott the Hoople said:
It's a lose/lose situation for us guys Darla. If we act like insufferable pricks we get called mysoginist (or needle dicks) but if we behave like senstive gentlemen we called "whimpy".
Click to expand...

Only misogynists get called misogynists and/or needledicks. And the only people calling sensitive, DECENT guys (who have a SPINE) "whimpy" for rebuking the needledicks are - wait for it - the needledicks!
 
Mott the Hoople said:
It's a lose/lose situation for us guys Darla. If we act like insufferable pricks we get called mysoginist (or needle dicks) but if we behave like senstive gentlemen we called "whimpy" or mommas boys.
Click to expand...


I know I feel so badly for you.

Signed,

The crazy bitch
aka/ The deranged lunatic

Have a good night Mott.
 
Bijou said:
Only misogynists get called misogynists and/or needledicks. And the only people calling sensitive, DECENT guys (who have a SPINE) "whimpy" for rebuking the needledicks are - wait for it - the needledicks!
Click to expand...

I would suggest that the men here do women a service just by being themselves.

It reminds me of a long time ago when Cawacko wanted to know what the right thing to call "midgets" was these days, because his company had hired one and he didn't want to offend them.

And this very cutting leftist we used to post with told him "I think you should call him a midget so he knows upfront what a prick you are".

Yeah.
 
Darla said:
I would suggest that the men here do women a service just by being themselves.

It reminds me of a long time ago when Cawacko wanted to know what the right thing to call "midgets" was these days, because his company had hired one and he didn't want to offend them.

And this very cutting leftist we used to post with told him "I think you should call him a midget so he knows upfront what a prick you are".

Yeah.
Click to expand...

Well, the needledicks here have been free to reveal and express themselves, and for that I'm grateful. These idiots think their hate actually hurts me. How moronic of them. Unfortunately, the collective effect of their hatred - thanks to the sophomoric solidarity that needledicks receive from other needledicks and fence-sitters - helps to thwart any real progress in the direction of true equality and liberation for both sexes in the real world.

In other words, idiot needledicks and their spineless supporters are the obstacles to human progress. AGAIN.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top