Tethered to their rapists

no rana. just because there isn't a law for every conceivable circumstance doesn't mean that one would get custody by being a rapist. Character, possible threats to the child, child endangerment, good emotional upbringing, etc are all factors that WOULD be considered for the interests of the child that this rapist would almost certainly fail.

Yes, Grind, it happens, that is why this young woman is an activist trying to get the laws changed. Ms. Prewitt is a lawyer and here is an excellent paper she wrote on the issue. It s an eye opener, well for one it is an eye opener, for others, they will continue to deny the facts.

http://georgetownlawjournal.org/files/pdf/98-3/Prewitt.PDF
 
Yes, Grind, it happens, that is why this young woman is an activist trying to get the laws changed. Ms. Prewitt is a lawyer and here is an excellent paper she wrote on the issue. It s an eye opener, well for one it is an eye opener, for others, they will continue to deny the facts.

http://georgetownlawjournal.org/files/pdf/98-3/Prewitt.PDF

I still fail to see why any woman would want to bear the child of a rapist, asides from religious beliefs.
 
Yes, Grind, it happens, that is why this young woman is an activist trying to get the laws changed. Ms. Prewitt is a lawyer and here is an excellent paper she wrote on the issue. It s an eye opener, well for one it is an eye opener, for others, they will continue to deny the facts.

http://georgetownlawjournal.org/files/pdf/98-3/Prewitt.PDF

Please show me how often it's happened with convicted rapists that have been to jail. I bet it's almost NEVER.
 
You agreed with me UNTIL Grind dropped in with his comment about rape/no rape, then you went right to a snide comment: "so what is christie's point? geeze..that is what i get for not carefully checking her OP. her OP makes it as if the guy is guilty and couple that with her own OP words...i ASSumed."

that is simply not true. i still agree with you.

post 87 (posted before grind's post)

i believe the standard should be a conviction. not just an arrest, but an actual conviction. and, unless that conviction is overturned, my belief stands.

it is really annoying trying to have conversations with you when you lie so often.
 
that is simply not true. i still agree with you.

post 87 (posted before grind's post)



it is really annoying trying to have conversations with you when you lie so often.

It's really annoying try to have a debate with someone who's responses are regularly filled with name-calling and hair-splitting. That's why I'm done with this.
 
i did not call you a name and i split no hairs. you lied about what i said. that is the truth


.....and with that, the whiny crybaby got the desperately-needed-yet-negative attention he sought at the expense of a productive discussion. Another derailed, dumbed-down thread a la Yurt and his pettiness.

Another one bites the dust.....

:rofl2:
 
Hey man, the reason people get pissed off with you is that you immediately call them liars. Why can't you simply say you are incorrect and here is why.

notice she has not admitted she is wrong. if she did, i would not say she lied. she doubled down tom. she put her points in caps. and i do not always call people liars. you are incorrect.
 
.....and with that, the whiny crybaby got the desperately-needed-yet-negative attention he sought at the expense of a productive discussion. Another derailed, dumbed-down thread a la Yurt and his pettiness.

Another one bites the dust.....

:rofl2:

the irony of this post is truly hilarious.

it amazes me that no matter what i say, the lefties on this board have a coniption. i agree with christie, she gets pissed off at me and you claim i'm dumbing down the thread.

great board. :rolleyes:
 
the irony of this post is truly hilarious.

it amazes me that no matter what i say, the lefties on this board have a coniption. i agree with christie, she gets pissed off at me and you claim i'm dumbing down the thread.

great board. :rolleyes:

So leave, crybaby. Watch as no one gives a shit when you do.
 
So leave, crybaby. Watch as no one gives a shit when you do.

some people do. jerks like you are meaningless to me. you never engage in debate, all you do is insult, whine and go off on wild tangents. it is truly hilarious how all you've done is cry about my posts, yet you call me a cry baby.

like i said...irony.
 
.....and with that, the whiny crybaby got the desperately-needed-yet-negative attention he sought at the expense of a productive discussion. Another derailed, dumbed-down thread a la Yurt and his pettiness.

Another one bites the dust.....

:rofl2:

I'm done with his knuckleheaded comments. He thinks this isn't insulting: "when you lie so often" and "she has not admitted she is wrong." He's pulled this crap for as long as I've been here and I always get sucked back in, but I'm done now.
 
still better than nothing. and it's 5 years they are off the streets not harming other people. and with a record like that it will be very hard to get even partial custody of the child.


WOW...off the street for FIVE WHOLE YEARS?

I'm sure that's a HUGE relief to the woman who got raped...she's got 5 years to come up with a good alias and hope her attacker doesn't go looking for her.

And so much for your "and when he gets out in like... 2 decades or whatever... by the time he's out the child will probably be of legal age" claim...the kid won't even be in school before the rapist is out.
 
Back
Top