Polls biased?

Jarod

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Do you want your base comfortable that you are going to win or frightened that unless you vote your candidate will lose?

Are the polls biased? If so what candidate are they biased for?

Who would be behind such a conspiracy to make almost all major polling firms to produce biased data?
 
Jarod said:
Do you want your base comfortable that you are going to win or frightened that unless you vote your candidate will lose?

Are the polls biased? If so what candidate are they biased for?

Who would be behind such a conspiracy to make almost all major polling firms to produce biased data?
Click to expand...

Well, then answer this question if you don't think the polls are biased/wrong. Right now all of them except one uses a turnout model reflective of the 2008 Presidential election. Do you really think that we will see a turnout of +7 democrat in 2012? If you think that then the polls are dead on balls accurate.

Do you believe that OWEbama is really winning Ohio with a higher margin than he won with in 2008? If you believe that, then the polls are not wrong.

At the end of the day, it is all academic and the only poll that matters will be on November 6th. The only question is whether or not you will believe that poll. If OWEbama loses will you take it in stride or will you whine and complain that there was rampant cheating because the polls leading up to the election showed OWEbama leading?
 
Good post Jarod!

Prior to Mitt's 47% comment, democratic enhusiasm was lackluster.

Now the ppl are fired up. Not just the dems, but indys and social cons.

Obama should thank Mitt at the debate for handing the election to him on a silver platter.
 
Howey said:
Good post Jarod!

Prior to Mitt's 47% comment, democratic enhusiasm was lackluster.

Now the ppl are fired up. Not just the dems, but indys and social cons.

Obama should thank Mitt at the debate for handing the election to him on a silver platter.
Click to expand...

So that's the story? Dems were lackluster until the tape? Really? Ironic that the tape came forth right after the Libyan disaster, but I am sure that it was a big ole coinky dink
 
FactsRStubborn said:
So that's the story? Dems were lackluster until the tape? Really? Ironic that the tape came forth right after the Libyan disaster, but I am sure that it was a big ole coinky dink
Click to expand...

What difference does it make when it was released? The fact is that your boyfriend said it and dug his own grave. :)
 
Bijou said:
What difference does it make when it was released? The fact is that your boyfriend said it and dug his own grave. :)
Click to expand...

First of all I do not support Romney and will not be voting for him. I keep telling you I am voting for Calvin Coolidge.

As for the why, I think it is an interesting question. They had the tape since August. I am sure that they were waiting for the most opportune time to release it say; one week before the election? But, the ongoing events in Libya created the need for a quick diversion from the presidents failures, so they had to release it earlier than they wanted. I have no doubt that lefty David Corn let the OWEbama regime know he had it and coordinated with them. Can I prove it? Of course not, just my opinion. Nothing happens by accident in politics. There are no coincidences. If you choose not to employ critical thinking skills, then that is on you
 
FactsRStubborn said:
First of all I do not support Romney and will not be voting for him. I keep telling you I am voting for Calvin Coolidge.

As for the why, I think it is an interesting question. They had the tape since August. I am sure that they were waiting for the most opportune time to release it say; one week before the election? But, the ongoing events in Libya created the need for a quick diversion from the presidents failures, so they had to release it earlier than they wanted. I have no doubt that lefty David Corn let the OWEbama regime know he had it and coordinated with them. Can I prove it? Of course not, just my opinion. Nothing happens by accident in politics. There are no coincidences. If you choose not to employ critical thinking skills, then that is on you
Click to expand...


Rush Linberger parot!
 
FactsRStubborn said:
Well, then answer this question if you don't think the polls are biased/wrong. Right now all of them except one uses a turnout model reflective of the 2008 Presidential election. Do you really think that we will see a turnout of +7 democrat in 2012? If you think that then the polls are dead on balls accurate.

Do you believe that OWEbama is really winning Ohio with a higher margin than he won with in 2008? If you believe that, then the polls are not wrong.

At the end of the day, it is all academic and the only poll that matters will be on November 6th. The only question is whether or not you will believe that poll. If OWEbama loses will you take it in stride or will you whine and complain that there was rampant cheating because the polls leading up to the election showed OWEbama leading?
Click to expand...


So, if you are able to figure this out, why cant the pollsters?

What is the motive for them to be wrong?

If Romney wins and its not due to a flub like when Bush almost won... I will pick up and congradulate him and move on!
 
FactsRStubborn said:
Thank you for your thoughtful response. How could anyone argue with such fine logic and coherence?

:)
Click to expand...

I responded... I also pointed out that you are making the same silly point as Rush Linberger... only problem was that it all came out at a time when the Media was all over Romney for his politising of the Lybia situation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top