Obama lied about Libya

[zappasguitar]

MUST DEFEND OBAMA NO MATTER WHAT



We get it, you don't care about the truth

LOL...coward!

That's a GOOD little partisan hack...whatever you do, don't discuss the response to your comments.

Just go with more derision and evasion...it's worked so well for you so far!

 

[canceled.2021.1]

LOL...coward!

That's a GOOD little partisan hack...whatever you do, don't discuss the response to your comments.

Just go with more derision and evasion...it's worked so well for you so far!

Hey kettle. Its pot. You are black

 

[zappasguitar]

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi..._about_libya_doesnt_mean_they_were_false.html

The standard was set by demalquedacrats during the Iraq War. Being wrong about WMD meant the administration lied. Therefore, being wrong about what happened in Benghazi means the administration lied.

I am sure Jello will go diving into Google to try to defend his big eared douchebag kenyan born president, but it is enjoyable watching leftardiots have to eat the bullshit they dished out for years.

What is it they say about Karma?

Of course, to partisan hacks like FactsRMissing, Rummy's remarks are equal to the initial report made only HOURS after the attack.

Anyone want to bet ol FactsISaHack will find some way to ignore Rummy's comment: We know Iraq has WMD's..."We know where they are" Rumsfeld made that comment more than EIGHTEEN MONTHS after the attacks of 9/11, so he had plenty of time to verify, unlike Obama.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Of course, to partisan hacks like FactsRMissing, Rummy's remarks are equal to the initial report made only HOURS after the attack.

Anyone want to bet ol FactsISaHack will find some way to ignore Rummy's comment: We know Iraq has WMD's..."We know where they are" Rumsfeld made that comment more than EIGHTEEN MONTHS after the attacks of 9/11, so he had plenty of time to verify, unlike Obama.

more insults and derision

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

LOL...coward!

That's a GOOD little partisan hack...whatever you do, don't discuss the response to your comments.

Just go with more derision and evasion...it's worked so well for you so far!

more insults and derision

 

[zappasguitar]

more insults and derision

more insults and derision

TWO MORE personal attacks when he could just debate the subject...typical two-faced Yurt.

 

[hazlnut]

The new birtherism.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

TWO MORE personal attacks when he could just debate the subject...typical two-faced Yurt.

where is the personal attack?

interesting how i simply give your schtick right back to you, and somehow that makes me two faced. LOL.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Of course, to partisan hacks like FactsRMissing, Rummy's remarks are equal to the initial report made only HOURS after the attack.

Anyone want to bet ol FactsISaHack will find some way to ignore Rummy's comment: We know Iraq has WMD's..."We know where they are" Rumsfeld made that comment more than EIGHTEEN MONTHS after the attacks of 9/11, so he had plenty of time to verify, unlike Obama.

If you are going to call others a partisan hack you might carry more credibility if you weren't one yourself.

As to relitigating the Iraq war, are you serious?

Is that the best defense you have for OWEdummy?

Quick tweet it to Plugs for tonight