Transcript Truthers: Conservatives Deny Obama Called Libya Attack An "Act Of Terror"

Obama and his administration paraded around for two weeks, refusing to call it a terrorist attack! They insisted it was a spontaneous protest caused by a YouTube video. Turns out, it WAS a terrorist attack, planned and orchestrated by alQaeda, and had nothing to do with a video or spontaneous protests.

Candy Crowley: "Romney was right on the main."

and they appologised to the terrorists while not calling them terrorist and then they sent the terrorists socialist propaganda and tried to get fake birth certifficates along with talking to them about gay marriage.


Look meatsack,


your lies dont stand up to the facts.


YOU can continue to pretend the facts dont exsist because they make it hard for you to pretend your right about everything and thawt gives you a headache and you get grumpy and confused BUT if you continue to just refuse facts you continue to prove you have NO redeeming qualities for mankind to enjoy.


If you continue this path you will be an anarchist who cares about only distruction.


when you are on the wrong side of the facts menatlly healthy human beings CHANGE their flawed ideas and adopt ideas that are NOT in conflict with reality.



when is your party going to let the sane people run the show again?
 
YOU can continue to pretend the facts dont exsist..

Like the fact that the Libyan embassy requested more security and was denied?
Like the fact that Hillary and the State Department dropped the ball?
Like the fact that the Administration tried to cover up their incompetence?
Like the fact that the left-wing attempted to blame this on a Republican cut in funding that didn't ever happen?
Like the fact it took 2 weeks for them to call it a terrorist attack?
Like the fact it was never about a video on YouTube?
Like the fact it was an organized and coordinated attack by alQaeda on the anniversary of 9/11?
Like the fact that, in spite of what we now know, they STILL want to dance back to the video?

YES... I think Americans need to know the FACTS! Let's NOT pretend they don't exist!
 
dear meatsack,


your lists is riddled with idiot lies.


how do you deal with a meatsack American?


You call them what they are.

your a fucking liar dicksee
 
????....what he did NOT say was "this was an act of terrorism".............

SO WHAT?
he did say was "Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts."......

seems pretty obvious he was calling it senseless violence in response to denigration of religious beliefs......but maybe I just look at it that way because I'm sensible and logical.....

SO WHAT?

It appears he had reason to believe there was some sort of connection. He gave this speech a day after the incident. I really, don't see why anyone should give a god damn that he might not have had every fact straight anyway. He did not go on national TV, a full year after the report had been discredited, and lie about it to draw us into a war.

Why should I care about any of this nonsense? The whole controversy is incredibly stupid and serves no purpose but to excite a bunch of pinheads who watch too much right wing news. Romney fd up royally by speaking to these fringe lunatics and not focusing on the center. The guy who asked the question did not really get a straight answer. Romney would have been better off focusing on that. Instead he went for the stupid pinhead gotcha and.... bam! Cheney shoots him in the face!
 
Like the fact that the Libyan embassy requested more security and was denied?

You would be better off focusing on that, but instead you pinheads are all over the place ranting about nonsense. Few people are going to listen and they will actually go against Romney for encouraging the disgraceful use of this as a political football.

Like the fact that Hillary and the State Department dropped the ball?
Like the fact that the Administration tried to cover up their incompetence?

Neither of these are even factual comments. They are based on your EXTREMELY biased definiton of the ball and incompetence.

Like the fact that the left-wing attempted to blame this on a Republican cut in funding that didn't ever happen?

And the administration is responsible for this? You know they are busy doing something more than campaigning, right?

Like the fact it took 2 weeks for them to call it a terrorist attack?

Apparently, it fucking matters to somebody that you are very very very careful with the wording. I have no idea why and I am guessing most Americans that are not completely batshit crazy don't either.

Like the fact it was never about a video on YouTube?
Like the fact it was an organized and coordinated attack by alQaeda on the anniversary of 9/11?
Like the fact that, in spite of what we now know, they STILL want to dance back to the video?

YES... I think Americans need to know the FACTS! Let's NOT pretend they don't exist!

So tell them those facts. But you want more. Apparently, we are supposed to be mad that Obama is not omnisicient? No matter what the video did draw a reaction throughout the ME. Right wingers even posted comments here about that.

If you were not snorkeling through the fever swamps of the right wing fringe you might notice that the mountain you see looks like a mole hill.
 
The fact is, he, AND his Administration denied its was a terrorist attack for the next two weeks..........


September 12 --
White House spokesman Jay Carney, in response to questions about whether the attack was planned:
"It's too early for us to make that judgment.

September 13 --
Jay Carney:
"The protests we're seeing around the region are in reaction to this movie.
September 13 --
State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland:
Refused to call it terrorism...

"So I know that's going to be frustrating for you, but we really want to make sure that we do this right and we don't jump to conclusions."
September 14 -- Jay Carney:
"We were not aware of any actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi was planned or imminent."
September 16 -- Susan Rice, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, on CNN's "State of the Union" with Candy Crowley: "There was a hateful video that was disseminated on the Internet. It had nothing to do with the United States government,
Susan Rice insisted to television viewers that the incident “was not a preplanned, premeditated attack,” but rather a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Muslim Web video.
September 18 -- Jay Carney:
"Our belief, based on the information we have, is it was the video that caused the unrest in Cairo, and the video and the unrest in Cairo that helped -- that precipitated some of the unrest in Benghazi and elsewhere.
September 19 -- Jay Carney:
"Right now I'm saying we don't have evidence at this point that this was premeditated or preplanned to coincide on a -- to happen on a specific date or coincide with that anniversary."

September 20 -- President Obama responding to a question about the possible involvement of al Qaeda: "What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests."
Finally.....
September 20 -- Jay Carney:
"It is, I think, self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack. Our embassy was attacked violently, and the result was four deaths of American officials."

September 25 -- President Obama on ABC's "The View," in response to interviewer Joy Behar's question, "I heard Hillary Clinton say it was an act of terrorism. Is it? What do you say?": "We're still doing an investigation. "

Asked a direct question about Clinton calling the attack a terrorist attack on The View... Is it? What do you say?" , he STILL refused to say Benghazi was a terrorist attack.
in plain simple words.....all he need to due was nod or say yes.....

All of this in total and in context says he must have talking about some generic attacks on Americans in general and not specifically the attack in Benghazi
 
No matter what the video did draw a reaction throughout the ME. Right wingers even posted comments here about that.

We now know, the planned and coordinated alQaeda terrorist attacks on our Consulate and assassination of our Ambassador and three others, on the anniversary of 9/11, had absolutely NOTHING to do with any video. You want to keep repeating this meme, that's fine... beware, the people now KNOW THE TRUTH and you are making yourself look even more dishonest and out of touch. I am all for that, to be honest!
 
The fact is, he, AND his Administration denied its was a terrorist attack for the next two weeks..........


September 12 --
White House spokesman Jay Carney, in response to questions about whether the attack was planned:
"It's too early for us to make that judgment.

September 13 --
Jay Carney:
"The protests we're seeing around the region are in reaction to this movie.
September 13 --
State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland:
Refused to call it terrorism...

"So I know that's going to be frustrating for you, but we really want to make sure that we do this right and we don't jump to conclusions."
September 14 -- Jay Carney:
"We were not aware of any actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi was planned or imminent."
September 16 -- Susan Rice, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, on CNN's "State of the Union" with Candy Crowley: "There was a hateful video that was disseminated on the Internet. It had nothing to do with the United States government,
Susan Rice insisted to television viewers that the incident “was not a preplanned, premeditated attack,” but rather a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Muslim Web video.
September 18 -- Jay Carney:
"Our belief, based on the information we have, is it was the video that caused the unrest in Cairo, and the video and the unrest in Cairo that helped -- that precipitated some of the unrest in Benghazi and elsewhere.
September 19 -- Jay Carney:
"Right now I'm saying we don't have evidence at this point that this was premeditated or preplanned to coincide on a -- to happen on a specific date or coincide with that anniversary."

September 20 -- President Obama responding to a question about the possible involvement of al Qaeda: "What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests."
Finally.....
September 20 -- Jay Carney:
"It is, I think, self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack. Our embassy was attacked violently, and the result was four deaths of American officials."

September 25 -- President Obama on ABC's "The View," in response to interviewer Joy Behar's question, "I heard Hillary Clinton say it was an act of terrorism. Is it? What do you say?": "We're still doing an investigation. "

Asked a direct question about Clinton calling the attack a terrorist attack on The View... Is it? What do you say?" , he STILL refused to say Benghazi was a terrorist attack.
in plain simple words.....all he need to due was nod or say yes.....

All of this in total and in context says he must have talking about some generic attacks on Americans in general and not specifically the attack in Benghazi

Some people pretend that people on this site are as clueless as the normal prole voter voting because some commercial has said that Oscar the Grouch may have to move in with you. To do this they try to use spin, etc. This happens with both sides, mind you... but the reality is spin like this is worthless here. We all know, even the people trying to say his mention of "acts of terror" even while he had everybody directly stating it was not an attack but a "spontaneous act" due to "protests" that were happening in and around the Consulate, which we later have found to be total and utter rubbish.

Hillary didn't send these people out to say that, that was our beloved buck-passer President.
 
So... Candy Crowley was Dick Cheney in this fantasy scenario?

Only in your mind is it always someone else's fault and most conveniently a female member of the media. Romney did this to himself though I kind of feel sorry for him.

Cheney is a right wing lunatic in all scenarios. Romney is listening to the right wing too much. He got caught up in some stupid insignificant phrasing/parsing that you guys seem to think is so critical. He was out with Cheney, trying to attract some loons and... pow! shotgun blast to the face. It is the same thing every time. The right wing is defeating itself due to spending too much time in the echo chamber and not listening to or trusting any other voices but their own.

If I were you guys, I would drop this issue. It's a REAL loser. You might have made something out of it if Romney had focused on the important details of that fellows question. But he blew it. Instead he got caught up on stupid bs about whether Obama called it a terrorist attack and when. You already got ALL the votes of the people who think that stupid shit matters one fucking bit. You are only turning people against you with it now. I am not voting for ObamaRomeny either way but I can tell you how it plays. It could really hurt Johnson but not in the way you are hoping!
 
Some people pretend that people on this site are as clueless as the normal prole voter voting because some commercial has said that Oscar the Grouch may have to move in with you. To do this they try to use spin, etc. This happens with both sides, mind you... but the reality is spin like this is worthless here. We all know, even the people trying to say his mention of "acts of terror" even while he had everybody directly stating it was not an attack but a "spontaneous act" due to "protests" that were happening in and around the Consulate, which we later have found to be total and utter rubbish.

Hillary didn't send these people out to say that, that was our beloved buck-passer President.

So then you are saying that Romney IS responsible for everything some right winger says? Akin, Fuqua, the "some rape easy" guy and all the other crazies?

That's the logical conclusion of what you are saying about Obama. Supposedly he has some sort of mind control over everyone that might be a little bit favorable to him or is not on the Romney bandwagon? Is he doing it through the fuoride in the water, soy protein or weed?

But, Romney being all decent, can't figure out how to work his magic underwear, I guess.
 
We now know, the planned and coordinated alQaeda terrorist attacks on our Consulate and assassination of our Ambassador and three others, on the anniversary of 9/11, had absolutely NOTHING to do with any video. You want to keep repeating this meme, that's fine... beware, the people now KNOW THE TRUTH and you are making yourself look even more dishonest and out of touch. I am all for that, to be honest!

So when Damo and all the other right wingers here were commenting on the response of the ME to the video, were they under Obama's magical powers? I think, you are taking Halloween too seriously.

I am certainly not in touch with Limbaugh and Fox News. I don't care to be. If they misread or even distorted what happened nothing came of it and there has been no policy change on it. You guys have not even related this to any coherent policy issue.

It lead to some speeches you did not like? Oh the horror! Wait... was there any chance you were going to like those speeches? No.

All this is about is your side waving the bloody flag again. It's always repulsive to decent people. That does not necessarily mean Obama supporters, but it definitely excludes you and your kind.
 
its time to start calling the fact adverse what they are.


anyone who lies straight into the face of facts without one iota of guilt is a sociopath.

You shouldn't be so hard on yourself.
I'm sure your anti-social behavior can be controlled through medication and behavior modification counseling.
 
Back
Top