Rupert Murdoch, Looking to Buy Los Angeles Times & Chicago Tribune

RockX

Banned
With Tribune Co. expected to emerge from bankruptcy soon, News Corp. Chairman and Chief Executive Rupert Murdoch is looking to acquire two of its trophy properties — the Los Angeles Times and the Chicago Tribune.

Tribune Co.'s debt holders — two investment firms and a bank — will become majority owners of the company after it exits bankruptcy, which could happen by year's end. News Corp. executives have had preliminary talks with these debt holders about acquiring the Los Angeles Times and Chicago Tribune, according to two ranking News Corp. executives and others familiar with the situation.

These people cautioned that talks are in the early stages, and that a deal is by no means certain. Other potential buyers have expressed interest.

Murdoch heads the world's largest news company, which includes the Wall Street Journal and the Times of London.

Acquiring the Los Angeles Times and the Chicago Tribune would give him strong footholds in the nation's three largest media markets: New York, Los Angeles and Chicago.
Murdoch's lieutenants say he has long wanted to buy The Times. On trips to Los Angeles, he is known to mark up the newspaper with a Sharpie pen to illustrate how he would design pages.

News Corp. and Tribune Co. have existing business ties. Tribune owns 23 television stations, including nine that carry the programming of News Corp.'s two broadcast networks. Tribune stations in San Diego, Sacramento and five other markets are Fox network affiliates.

The Los Angeles Times also prints more than 100,000 copies of the Wall Street Journal that are distributed in Southern California, and the Tribune prints the Journal in Chicago.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-murdoch-newspapers-20121020,0,6204152.story

LOL

Thats gonna make liberals heads explode if he buys them.
 
Not all humans are so stupid they will buy the Murdock liespaper mold.

Most want a news paper and NOT a liespaper
 
If he does they will become rags that no one reads

LOL, the (UC)LA Times is a rag that very few people read now. Now why Murdoch wants to buy into a dying industry I have no idea but the LA Times is already a joke.
 
http://www.latimes.com/about/mediagroup/latimes/circulation/


Circulation

• The Timesʼ total average paid Sunday circulation is 1,019,388 and Monday-Friday circulation is 723,181.

• The newspaperʼs single-copy distribution network includes more than 8,500 retail stores, hotels and other locations and more than 14,000 newspaper racks.

• The Times' in-market home delivery area extends from Santa Barbara to the Mexican border -- a 45,000-square-mile area larger than the state of Ohio.

• The Times is sold and distributed in combination with several leading daily and weekly native-language publications including the Armenian language Asbarez, Chinese Daily News, Korea Times and Korea Daily News, the Russian language newspaper Panorama, the Englishlanguage India Journal, the Chino Champion and L.A. Sentinel.
 
dude all paper delivery is dropping.


why do you pretend its just the LA times?

becuase your a liar
 
dude all paper delivery is dropping.


why do you pretend its just the LA times?

becuase your a liar

So by saying the (UC)LA Times subscription has been dropping over the past decade, which it has, because it's quality has greatly diminished makes me a liar?
Ok.

Is there a reason you are so defensive regarding the LA Times? I think I know why.
 
dude all paper delivery is dropping.


why do you pretend its just the LA times?

becuase your a liar

From post #3, "Now why Murdoch wants to buy into a dying industry I have no idea"

But I pretend it's just the LA Times. SMH.
 
Dood... You can't keep cutting writers and reporters and think your quality won't suffer. Newspapers are dying.
 
Dood... You can't keep cutting writers and reporters and think your quality won't suffer. Newspapers are dying.

Daddy Damocles dashes to defend his lil' ideological offspring and also fails to prove Cawack-off's claim that the LA Times has lost subscribers due to "diminished quality".



Can the Dancin' Dalai Damocles prove that Cawack-off's claim is true, or not?
 
Back
Top