How can Romney win?

I told you you would get robmoney and like it because the power people had already decided.


look at you liking it
 
The steady increase in Romney's percent of the vote and steady decline in Santorum's represents a statistical anomaly. In this case, the anomaly is amazing according to the researchers. They argue that the probability of this happening by chance alone is so small it exceeds the capability of statistical packages to handle. Their software says Romney's share of the vote, increasing with precinct size has zero probability of occurring by chance alone.

The significance of the Wisconsin analysis is of grave concern. Presuming the use of appropriate statistical measures and analysis, human intervention is the most likely available explanation.

Vote flipping gave Romney a 57,000-vote victory over Santorum in Wisconsin. Absent vote flipping, Santorum would have won over Romney by about 54,000 according the group's analysis.

Was Wisconsin the only state where Romney's share of the vote increased in this way as precinct size increased?

There were eleven states that showed this amazing anomaly, Romney gaining in votes and margins as precinct size increased. The chart below shows the estimated vote flipping for eleven of the fifty states analyzed by the group using precinct-level data.

Estimated Votes Lost/Gained in 11 State Primaries - 2012 - Vote Flipping
 
evince said:
did you look at the link?
Click to expand...

from your crackpot site? Yes I looked. It is quite humorous. No wonder you maintain your existence in that fantasy land. They say everything you want to believe.

The fact that Romney did better in 'large precincts' vs. 'small precincts' can be easily explained by him campaigning more in large cities and their suburbs vs. going rural. But I know that simple explanation is not what you want to hear. You would rather believe in this fantasy.
 
hey meatsack who was it that warned you about election tampering wheich turned out to be completely true?
 
so that is how you simpley dismiss these statistical studies of these probabilities?


man you suck ass
 
evince said:
so that is how you simpley dismiss these statistical studies of these probabilities?
man you suck ass
Click to expand...

I looked at their 'statistical' study. It is every bit as much of a joke as you are. They had a result and they designed their study to produce it. period. The way they try to dismiss the urban/suburban vs. rural voting patterns is humorous at best. Do you even understand the statistics Desh?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top