Whats your guess....

[Jarod]

Under President Obama has the percentage of income paid by the highest tax bracket been;


The lowest in America since the 1930's?

The highest in America since the 1930's?

About in the middle in America since the 1930's?

 

[Jarod]

First dont look it up, just tell me what you think... then look it up, or Ill post a link later.

 

[Jarod]

Conservatives are you afraid of this?

 

[evince]

they jsut ignore facts that dont help their meme

 

[Jarod]

We have had the lowest income tax since the 1930's, and the worst economy.... What does that tell you? The taxes are way too low for a healthy economy, we need to go back to the rates when Bill Clinton was president.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

We have had the lowest income tax since the 1930's, and the worst economy.... What does that tell you? The taxes are way too low for a healthy economy, we need to go back to the rates when Bill Clinton was president.

We also have the most abusive over spending since the 1930's... so what does that tell you?

 

[evince]

what fucking horseshit.


who is it that paid for a worthless war on the crdit card you meatsack

 

[Jarod]

We also have the most abusive over spending since the 1930's... so what does that tell you?

The combination of over spending with under taxing is a bad mix that needs to be corrected. The spending has come down in the last two years, but the Republicans are diggin in there heels on the taxes. The massive debt was caused by the first two unfunded wars in US history during a time of unprecidented under taxation.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

what fucking horseshit.
who is it that paid for a worthless war on the crdit card you meatsack

dear little partisan hack... I said we have had the most abusive overspending since the 1930's. I know in your partisan little world that means it has to be one party or the other. But it is not. It is both of them. You fucking meatsack.

 

[Jarod]

Spending needs to be reigned in, the President agrees, and taxes need to return to a more healthy level, the President agrees.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Spending needs to be reigned in, the President agrees, and taxes need to return to a more healthy level, the President agrees.

Yet the President continues outspending revenue by over $1T per year and CBO projects he will continue to do so over the next four years if existing policies remain.

Raising taxes on 'the rich' is not going to solve the problem. They think they can get about $500b over ten years. Tell us how that cuts into a trillion dollar deficit Jarod. Spending is the problem.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Also Jarod... If the President 'agrees'... why has he done nothing in four years to do so? Why did he extend the tax cuts? Is he going to extend the Obama tax cuts yet again?

 

[canceled.2021.1]

We have had the lowest income tax since the 1930's, and the worst economy.... What does that tell you? The taxes are way too low for a healthy economy, we need to go back to the rates when Bill Clinton was president.

Why just the top rate? Why not all of the rates?

Are you saying that if we just raise taxes 4% on the top 1% that all of our economic problems will go away and GDP will hit 5%? Is that what you are saying?

 

[evince]

dear little partisan hack... I said we have had the most abusive overspending since the 1930's. I know in your partisan little world that means it has to be one party or the other. But it is not. It is both of them. You fucking meatsack.

Nope its your party who wants to kill the government dead.


They said it right out loud

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Nope its your party who wants to kill the government dead.
They said it right out loud

As I have stated many times Desh... you are a complete partisan hack. You are a liar. You continue to put the blinders on to the incompetency of your party. You think all the evil is created by the 'right'. You can't see any of the corruption that occurs on the left. The sooner you realize that both parties have been screwing us for the past 50 years, the better.

 

[Jarod]

Yet the President continues outspending revenue by over $1T per year and CBO projects he will continue to do so over the next four years if existing policies remain.

Raising taxes on 'the rich' is not going to solve the problem. They think they can get about $500b over ten years. Tell us how that cuts into a trillion dollar deficit Jarod. Spending is the problem.

Raising taxes on the rich will not solve the problem, but it will help the problem. We MUST have a mix of spending cuts and tax increases if we are to get out of this mess. Just like Bill Clinton did in the 1990's.

 

[Jarod]

Also Jarod... If the President 'agrees'... why has he done nothing in four years to do so? Why did he extend the tax cuts? Is he going to extend the Obama tax cuts yet again?

He says he is not going to extend the Bush tax cuts... IDK what he will do. I disagreed that he should have done what he did. He did propose several times spending cuts that would ride along with tax increases, but that was DOA as Bonner stated!

 

[Jarod]

Why just the top rate? Why not all of the rates?

Are you saying that if we just raise taxes 4% on the top 1% that all of our economic problems will go away and GDP will hit 5%? Is that what you are saying?

No, that is not what I am saying, read what I wrote, then you will see what I am saying.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

No, that is not what I am saying, read what I wrote, then you will see what I am saying.

OK it looks like you want to go the route of the Legion Troll. Are you saying that higher taxes will lead to economic growth? And specifically higher taxes on the rich?

Explain the economics of that

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

He says he is not going to extend the Bush tax cuts... IDK what he will do. I disagreed that he should have done what he did. He did propose several times spending cuts that would ride along with tax increases, but that was DOA as Bonner stated!

The Bush tax cuts ended in 2010. Obama will either extend his own tax cuts or he will not.

Link us up to his spending cut proposals.