GOP's Benghazi Smoking Gun Goes Up in Smoke

You want me to address you personally bac. You are nothing but a hater who tears down people that are far better than you becasue they have tried and came up somewhere short of perfection. You are a loser.

WOW... the IRONY!

Stringy, I have no love loss for either you or bac when it comes to general politics, and he has indeed called me a racist and other assorted derogatory names through the years, but on the issue of the administration's handling of Benghazi, he is right on the money. The only disagreement I have with him is the contention a Republican would have acted the same. If a similar circumstance had transpired under a Republican, they would have already moved to impeach him for it.

In this case, YOU are the one hating and denigrating because you have no defense. He's clocking your ass pretty good, best I can tell.
 
ON DISPLAY FOR ALL TO SEE.

Your ignorant ass came back with some bullshit that has absolutely nothing to do with Susan Rice, Condolessa Rice, or Rice-A-Roni.

Then your really dumb ass jumped right into 'hot air' and I love dictators.

The videos CLEARLY demonstrate the Libyan people standing with Gaddafi and against NATO bombing .. and they demonstrate why they stood with him.

Is there anyone surprised why this bitch runs from me and undeniable truth?

Keep in mind that you started this you idiot fuck. I'm going to finish it.

The videos CLEARLY demonstrated that millions of Libyans stood against NATO bombio

My commnet WAS related to Susan Rice. Do you have anything but a ignorant comeback for it?

You do love dictators. You constantly rush to their defense. Are we supposed to not remember that?

Who is running? I have addressed you.

Your comments are usually beside the point because you only discuss fairy tales where there are no tough decisions between two bad choices. That's not reality and not relevant to the situation that exists now.
 
Where did the 'rebels' come from?

Where did the 'uprising' start?

Wye, it was a spontaneous uprising, bac, aren't you listening? There was this YouTube video, (which incidentally, had only 17 views the day before 9/11) and it sparked a spontaneous grass-roots protest which caused RPG's and mortars to appear from nowhere, and trucks with terrorist organization logos to spring from their asses, and they just so happened to decide to attack a US Ambassador at our consulate on the anniversary of 9/11/01. It was all completely innocent, you see?

But we've arrested an American citizen who was exercising his 1st Amendment rights, so everything is going to be hunky-dory over there now, because these people really don't hate us at all, in fact, they LOVE Obama... they're endorsing him!
 
The opposition was Al Queda and terrorists from Benghazi you fucking clueless clown.

Where did the 'rebels' come from?

Where did the 'uprising' start?

Where is the world's hotbed for terrorism according to most reliable sources INCLUDING the West Point Center on Terrorism?

All of this goes right over the heads of morons.

Yeah, that is what you claim to have known based on??? Oh yeah, what you got from some left wing whackadoodle site that you won't offer as a source.

Please, go ahead and supply us with the direct link to the West Point Center on Terrorism comments with context or even a link to where you likely heard it out of context. That is, I don't need your "stop right there."
 
Wye, it was a spontaneous uprising, bac, aren't you listening? There was this YouTube video, (which incidentally, had only 17 views the day before 9/11) and it sparked a spontaneous grass-roots protest which caused RPG's and mortars to appear from nowhere, and trucks with terrorist organization logos to spring from their asses, and they just so happened to decide to attack a US Ambassador at our consulate on the anniversary of 9/11/01. It was all completely innocent, you see?

But we've arrested an American citizen who was exercising his 1st Amendment rights, so everything is going to be hunky-dory over there now, because these people really don't hate us at all, in fact, they LOVE Obama... they're endorsing him!

Geezez, ditzy. Do try to keep up. bac is talking about the more general uprising against Quadaffi.
 
WOW... the IRONY!

Stringy, I have no love loss for either you or bac when it comes to general politics, and he has indeed called me a racist and other assorted derogatory names through the years, but on the issue of the administration's handling of Benghazi, he is right on the money. The only disagreement I have with him is the contention a Republican would have acted the same. If a similar circumstance had transpired under a Republican, they would have already moved to impeach him for it.

In this case, YOU are the one hating and denigrating because you have no defense. He's clocking your ass pretty good, best I can tell.

Yeah, best you can tell. lol

You don't even know what he is talking about. His criticism is that we should not have been there in the first place. The fact is, that my position is closer to bac's than yours. You are definitely THE "stupid Americans."
 
Geezez, ditzy. Do try to keep up. bac is talking about the more general uprising against Quadaffi.

Oh, but THAT uprising was part of the wonderful and beautiful Arab Spring! Quadaffi was a meany and needed to go, so these people could have freedom and enjoy apple pie and baseball like us! It's just that darned video got some of them riled up and mortars started popping out of their asses left and right, so what else could they do but attack a US consulate on the anniversary of the worst terror attack in US history?
 
Wye, it was a spontaneous uprising, bac, aren't you listening? There was this YouTube video, (which incidentally, had only 17 views the day before 9/11) and it sparked a spontaneous grass-roots protest which caused RPG's and mortars to appear from nowhere, and trucks with terrorist organization logos to spring from their asses, and they just so happened to decide to attack a US Ambassador at our consulate on the anniversary of 9/11/01. It was all completely innocent, you see?

But we've arrested an American citizen who was exercising his 1st Amendment rights, so everything is going to be hunky-dory over there now, because these people really don't hate us at all, in fact, they LOVE Obama... they're endorsing him!

.. so says the programming.

The reality is quite different ..

.. and I agree with you, had this been a republican, democrats would be marching in the streets and out to impeach him.
 
Wow, you mean left-wing sites aren't "fair and balanced?"

When did I say they were? Now for lazy people like you this means that you should ignore anything with a hint of being from the left wing or that is critical of the GOP. This leaves you with sources that are biased towards the right and increasingly insane. To me, it indicates that I should balance the source out and see what others are saying before forming any firm conclusions.

That's the problem. You don't listen to anything that does not reaffirm your position. You recently restated your MO which I have been aware of for some time. You said and I am paraphrasing... pro lifers should remember that anyone that asks them a question on abortion is NOT THEIR FRIEND. That is the way you operate on everything. Someone disagrees with you it must be because they are the Devil or in league with him. It is a fucked up way of dealing with the world and organizing information.
 
When did I say they were? Now for lazy people like you this means that you should ignore anything with a hint of being from the left wing or that is critical of the GOP. This leaves you with sources that are biased towards the right and increasingly insane. To me, it indicates that I should balance the source out and see what others are saying before forming any firm conclusions.

That's the problem. You don't listen to anything that does not reaffirm your position. You recently restated your MO which I have been aware of for some time. You said and I am paraphrasing... pro lifers should remember that anyone that asks them a question on abortion is NOT THEIR FRIEND. That is the way you operate on everything. Someone disagrees with you it must be because they are the Devil or in league with him. It is a fucked up way of dealing with the world and organizing information.

Here's what I listen to... the FACTS AND DETAILS. You listen to spin and hype from left-wing radicals who want to protect Obama so he can re-elected. What I said about politicians that are pro-life is true, they should always assume the person asking the questions is attempting to ambush them or distort their answers and exploit them, because that is what they continuously do, over and over again.
 
.. so says the programming.

The reality is quite different ..

.. and I agree with you, had this been a republican, democrats would be marching in the streets and out to impeach him.

So you don't actually have a source for the West Point Center of Terrorsim and you are going to hide your "persona" behind that of a guy that takes pride in a history of racism and hate? Hmmm intersting.

For the record, I have little doubt if Obama were a Republican the Democrats would be up in arms. But then there is no real way to tell if the details would havebeen the same. That is, under McCain we probably would not have gotten involved in Libya because we would have been bogged down in a war with Iran. Those sorts of hypotheticals are rather pointless and the refuge of cowards who won't deal with the reality of the world as it exists, like you.
 
Yeah, that is what you claim to have known based on??? Oh yeah, what you got from some left wing whackadoodle site that you won't offer as a source.

Please, go ahead and supply us with the direct link to the West Point Center on Terrorism comments with context or even a link to where you likely heard it out of context. That is, I don't need your "stop right there."

You're not only a pussy .. incredibly dumb .. you're also real easy.

West Point Terror Center Confirms Al Qaeda in Libya

The 2007 West Point Combating Terrorism Center (CTC) report [1] examining the demographics of foreign fighters caught in Iraq fighting US troops has been cited by alarmed analysts as proof that the current NATO-backed rebellion in Libya is literally handing an entire nation over to Al Qaeda linked terrorists, namely those of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) listed by both the US State Department and UK Home Office as a foreign terrorist organization.

The report indicated that by far, the eastern region of Libya, in particular the cities of Darnah and Benghazi now serving as the epicenter of the NATO-backed rebellion, provided more fighters per capita to combat US troops in Iraq than any other nation, including Saudi Arabia. In the report, it is noted that most of these Libyan fighters were members of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) who were involved in an increasingly cooperative relationship with Al Qaeda. This relationship culminated in November 3, 2007, when the CTC report claims that LIFG officially joined Al Qaeda. The report than goes on to elaborately depict just how close together LIFG has been working with Al Qaeda, including the mention of LIFG member Abu Yahya, who is noted as second only to Ayman al-Zawahiri within Al Qaeda - al-Zawahiri at the time was Al Qaeda's #2 under "Osama Bin Laden."

more at link
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/09/west-point-terror-center-confirms-al.html

Do you have any idea what the Sinjar Records are?

Of course you don't because you're stupid.
http://www.thecenterlane.com/?tag=sinjar-records

You're stupid and your feeble mind can't entertain anything outside of its programming.

Homework for your dummy .. WHO IS THE LIFG?

You don't fucking know .. that's why its homework.
 
So you don't actually have a source for the West Point Center of Terrorsim and you are going to hide your "persona" behind that of a guy that takes pride in a history of racism and hate? Hmmm intersting.

For the record, I have little doubt if Obama were a Republican the Democrats would be up in arms. But then there is no real way to tell if the details would havebeen the same. That is, under McCain we probably would not have gotten involved in Libya because we would have been bogged down in a war with Iran. Those sorts of hypotheticals are rather pointless and the refuge of cowards who won't deal with the reality of the world as it exists, like you.

If you have a problem with my 'persona' .. kiss my ass. Who and what the fuck are you?

You want to talk about everything but the facts .. so why don't you just run your pussy ass away and hide?

Next time pick your targets better.
 
.. Surely democrats trust aarticles and sites like this ..

Benghazi Attack: Libyan Witnesses Recount Organized Assault
From the Huffington Post.

There was nothing in that article that supported your position and I already commented on the piece of misleading information regarding Susan Rice. Go get the transcripts. She stumbled around a bit but NEVER said anything definite about the video being the sole cause of the attack. She WAS using the information that the CIA had at the time of the interviews. Her few missteps in answering the questions are not definitive proof of anything.

There really is no smoking gun of a conspiracy or a cover up in the article. Nobody is arguing that it was not a planned attack. The argument is about when we knew. But unsourced eye witness accounts are not all that conclusive. Are you unaware of how often eywitness accounts are proven wrong? You don't care and you will repeat over and over any little bit that supports your narrative of craziness and the mountains of evidence against you are just proof that the conspiracy is wide and far reaching.
 
If you have a problem with my 'persona' .. kiss my ass. Who and what the fuck are you?

You want to talk about everything but the facts .. so why don't you just run your pussy ass away and hide?

Next time pick your targets better.

So that's a no on the source about what the West Point Center of Terrorism said?

I am talking about the facts, you are running for cover and kissing the ass of a guy that you don't even agree with on this subject.

In your disturbed little world every American action is that of a terrorist state. Of course, you will bash Obama and yes you would bash McCain. You would bash anyone in that position without any real consideration of the facts because you seem to think Quadaffi was a great guy. You are not objective. You are a loon.
 
I did. Rice did not make any definitive statements.

Your other claims are just a bunch of hot air that you cannot support with anything more than name calling.

You love dictators and imagine that if you were made one the world could be perfect. But nobody is ever going let you do that, so you can either get in line and try to help or you can get in the way.


Definitive or not....they parroted the same statements for 2 weeks KNOWING, KNOWING they were lies.....even in the UN by none other than the big BO....

They knew the truth immediately from communications with the people on the ground.....a sustained, planned attack....not with rocks and chanting, but
with AK47's, grenades, and RPG's......on the anniversary of the WTC attack would tell any moron it not about some silly, practically unseen video that was only
mentioned by the Embassy in Cairo BEFORE any unrest occured....
 
Back
Top